4 of 5 seats affirm compliance; no seat finds a violation
Opus 5 (Anthropic)compliesread reasoning
This is a presentation-layer change only: a new derived domain module (`src/domain/record.ts`), a component, a test, a case-page wiring, and a DECISIONS.md log entry. No content/ files change and the verification tool found no citation identifiers added, so no fabrication or provenance-label question arises. AGENTS.md is untouched, and nothing in §3.15's checks is loosened — if anything the change strengthens inspectability by surfacing each sitting's refusals with the verifier's own reason and a link to the underlying dispositions file. Provenance honesty is handled carefully: rows whose run left no record are displayed as exactly that, with verb, outcome and cost left null and a visible 'no run record' marker rather than an inferred stamp, and the test asserts this. Links are only emitted for ids present in the `linkable` set, avoiding dangling references (§8). The DECISIONS.md addition merely records the change, which is ordinary documentation, not an amendment to the constitution.
GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI)compliescites §3.8, §3.14, §3.15read reasoning
The change derives its case record from existing run records and disposition rows, exposing run IDs, dates, outcomes, costs, reasons, reopening conditions, and admitted-record IDs rather than creating new epistemic records. It handles missing run provenance honestly: orphaned disposition groups are explicitly marked “no run record,” and verb, outcome, and cost remain null rather than being inferred. No citations, confidential material, constitution edits, unratified assessments, or weakened checks are introduced, and the added test checks complete grouping and the required reason/admission fields.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google)unsureread reasoning
seat failed: SyntaxError: Unexpected token '§', ..." ["§3.8", §3.9", "§3"... is not valid JSON
Grok 4.5 (xAI)compliesread reasoning
The diff adds a derived Record panel (domain + UI + tests) that groups existing dispositions under run records, surfaces verifier refusal reasons and reopen conditions, and honestly labels sittings with no run record rather than inventing verb/outcome/cost. No content/ ledger records, citations, or AGENTS.md edits; DECISIONS.md only logs the UI decision. Nothing fabricates provenance, weakens §3.15 checks, or publishes confidence material—inspectability of sittings is strengthened, not diluted.
GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai, via Venice)compliescites §3.14, §3.15, §3.9, §4read reasoning
This is a presentation-layer change that derives 'The record' panel from existing run records and the dispositions file, storing nothing new — no citations, sources, locators, or provenance details are added, so nothing can be fabricated (citation verification confirms no identifiers in added lines). Notably, the code is careful about provenance honesty: runs whose records are absent are displayed as exactly that ('no run record exists for it, so its verb, outcome and cost are not known'), with nothing inferred — consistent with §3.9's source-statement-versus-inference distinction and §3.14's visible-history requirement. The tests enforce the constitution-relevant invariants (every row under exactly one run, every refusal carrying a reason, every admission naming its record), which strengthens rather than weakens the §3.15 checks. The docs/DECISIONS.md edit is a dated entry in the decisions log, which AI may write; the constitution itself (AGENTS.md) is untouched. No confidence material, no misattributed stamps, no unratified-draft presentation is visible in the complete diff.
judged against constitution 386cf5c5d4 · panel-v3 · verbatim record · pull request