The change is an intake only: nothing enters the claim/evidence ledger, and the added `content/cases/deep-memory/inputs/manifest.yaml` entry registers the supplied page as a founding input, explicitly not as evidence. The permission requirement of §3.15 is met with the rigor the rule demands: the supplier's own words are quoted, with grantor (Eugene Jhong, own work), date (2026-09-09), channel (working-session direction / inbox statement), and where the statement is held (inbox/processed/<run>/deep-memory__deep-memory-home.md), repeated identically on the sidecar, the run manifest, the report, DECISIONS.md and history.yaml. Provenance is anchored (repo, commit e9666a73, served URL, md5, sha256, byte count) and the text extraction is labeled as a pipeline extraction beside the unmodified original, satisfying §3.8/§3.9; I cannot verify the hashes or the commit, but nothing in the material is internally inconsistent and unfamiliarity is not evidence of fabrication. Verification labeling is honest: the report lists all 25 works the page names as "no OpenAlex result" (0 of 25 resolved) and instructs the drafter to retrieve and verify each before any Source is proposed, rather than laundering the page's bibliography into citations. Spend and run records agree (8240 input tokens = 2 + 8238 cache-write; $0.036789 in both), so provenance stamps match. AGENTS.md is untouched and no check is loosened. My one review note, not an objection: the second DECISIONS.md entry restoring `generate-case-art`/`add-commons-image` is unrelated to this drop and would be cleaner as its own change with the founder direction quoted as the others are.

The supplied page is registered as a founding narrative rather than admitted as ledger evidence, and the history explicitly says claims, evidence, and sources remain unchanged pending later retrieval and verification. The permission record identifies Eugene Jhong, the date, the Claude Code working-session channel, the permitted acts in his quoted words, and the repository path holding the record, satisfying §3.15’s recorded-permission requirement. The intake honestly reports that all 25 named works remain unresolved to locators and instructs the later drafter to retrieve and verify them before use, rather than presenting them as verified citations. Provenance is consistently connected to run 2026-09-09-inbox-deep-memory-200334, the source commit, archived copies, hashes, model, prompt version, date, and append-only case history.

The change takes in the founder's Deep Memory home page into the inbox and registers it as founding input DEEP-IN001 without modifying AGENTS.md or altering the claim ledger. The intake satisfies the explicit permission rules of §3.15 for supplied material, recording the supplier (Eugene Jhong), date (2026-09-09), channel (working session / inbox statement), exact quotation of the grant, and the location where the record is held. Provenance, file hashes, run spend, decisions log, and case history are documented with exactness.

The diff only registers the founder's Deep Memory home page as founding input DEEP-IN001 (role founding_narrative) with HTML and text extraction under research/, plus inbox/proposal run records; no claims, evidence, sources, or assessments are added to the ledger. Permission is recorded to §3.15 standard: the supplier's words on the sidecar (granted 2026-09-09), channel and holding path named in the intake manifest/report, and the same grant and direction stamped in docs/DECISIONS.md and the case history. AGENTS.md is untouched. Named works are listed unresolved for later retrieval, not fabricated as ledger citations; citation tooling found no new content/ identifiers. Ordinary intake bookkeeping and spend/history stamps look honest.

The change is an inbox intake of the founder's own page as a founding narrative, and the §3.15 permission rule is satisfied on the record's face: the grant is quoted in the supplier's words, stamped with who (Eugene Jhong, own work), when (2026-09-09), channel (working session / Claude Code), and where held (the sidecar at inbox/processed/2026-09-09-inbox-deep-memory-200334/deep-memory__deep-memory-home.md), and mirrored in docs/DECISIONS.md and the manifest — matching the amendment that a recorded direction to publish supplied material is that permission. No AGENTS.md edit occurs; the ledger stays empty (claims, evidence, sources unchanged), the material is labeled founding input / hypothesis material 'never evidence' and the intake report marks it as working material, never citable as such, so nothing is presented as ratified or counted as evidence. The intake is honest about verification limits (25 works named, 0 resolved to locators, each marked 'no OpenAlex result'), and provenance is stamped with runId, model, date, and byte-hash/md5 for the copied file. I cannot independently verify that the founder's session grant occurred, but the constitution's test is the recorded rigor of the permission, which is met; no fabricated locator or citation is added under content/, and citation verification found none. The second DECISIONS.md entry merely records a founder direction about reinstating art tooling — a decision-log record, permitted by §3.15, with no check weakened in this diff.