This is a pipeline/schema change that strengthens provenance rather than weakening it: `readerActs` records each intake change the second reader makes to an evidence record with field, from, to, model, runId, promptVersion, date and reason, and the prose limitation note now names the run and the protocol — directly serving §3.14 and §3.15's stamping requirement. `origin` is explicitly left as the drafter's, so no actor is misattributed, and a dissent that changes nothing writes no act, avoiding an invented change record. AGENTS.md is untouched; no §3.15 check is loosened or dodged. No content/ citations are added, and the verification section reports no identifiers, so there is no fabrication surface. Tests assert both the new stamp text and the act arrays, and the docs and decisions log record the change with date and the review note it answers. The PR body's claim that this closes review note #253 is a claim about the record, not a directive, and nothing in the diff presents an unratified draft as ratified.

The change strengthens exact and versioned provenance by recording each reader-applied direction or claim-link change with the field, before and after values, model, run ID, prompt version, date, and reason. It preserves prior acts append-only, keeps the drafter’s origin distinct from the reader’s intervention, and also stamps non-mutating direction dissents in the limitations text. Remembered judgments use the remembered run ID and date, while tests cover both substantive changes and no-change dissents. No constitution file, publication gate, citation, confidence material, or epistemic check is weakened.

The PR addresses review note #253 by capturing changes made by the second reader at intake (modifications to direction or claim IDs) in a structured `readerActs` array on `EvidenceSchema`. Each act explicitly records `field`, `from`, `to`, `model`, `runId`, `promptVersion`, `date`, and `reason`, strengthening exact provenance and versioning under §3.8, §3.14, and §3.15. No constitution files are modified, no checks are weakened, and no citations or unverified records are introduced.

The diff adds optional structured readerActs on Evidence (field/from/to plus model, runId, promptVersion, date, reason), wires applyReader to stamp each actual direction or claimIds change that way, and enriches the existing limitations prose with run id and protocol version. That tightens §3.14/§3.15 provenance rather than weakening checks; origin remains the drafter's. Docs and tests match the behavior. No AGENTS.md edit, no citations, no confidence material, no fabricated records.

The change strengthens provenance rather than weakening anything: reader-applied changes to `direction` or `claimIds` — previously stamped only as prose with model and date — now carry the full §3.14/§3.15 stamp set (model, runId, promptVersion, date, reason) both in structured `readerActs` entries on the record and in the limitations prose, which directly answers review note #253's complaint that run id and prompt version were missing. The schema change is additive and optional, `origin` correctly remains the drafter's, dissent-without-change produces no act (so the record does not misattribute an action that did not happen), and the remembered-run logic stamps the run that actually answered rather than inventing one. No citations or locators are added, AGENTS.md is untouched, no confidence material appears, and the diff is complete with no omitted files, so there is nothing hidden that could change the verdict.