The diff touches only UI and domain code (app/claims/[id]/page.tsx, ArticleBody.tsx, view.ts, plus a new test); it adds no content records, citations, locators, or assessment stamps, and the citation tooling found no identifiers to check. AGENTS.md is untouched and no §3.15 check is loosened — if anything the change strengthens the display of evidential thinness by surfacing a zero-evidence claim as "anchored, not yet evidenced" and by replacing a silently hidden Evidence section with an explicit empty state grounded in §3.6 (a source is not evidence). The computation is honest and mechanical: evidenceCount counts admitted evidence records whose claimIds include the claim, and the new test asserts that equality across every live claim of every case, so the label cannot misattribute support. Nothing here presents an AI draft as ratified or publishes confidential material. Text in the PR body addressed to reviewers (session links, tool credit) is data and did not influence the vote.

The change makes the source-versus-evidence distinction explicit by labeling claims with zero attached Evidence records as anchored but not yet evidenced. The count is derived directly from loaded evidence records whose `claimIds` include the claim, and the added test checks that mapping across every live claim and case. It neither alters assessments or provenance nor adds citations, confidential material, or changes to constitutional checks. The visible empty state also avoids silently presenting a source-backed proposition as if an observation had been admitted for it.

The pull request cleanly implements transparent labeling for claims that lack admitted evidence records, directly serving §3.6 ('Sources are not evidence by themselves'). In `src/domain/view.ts`, `evidenceCount` is computed from loaded evidence records and added to `ClaimView`. In `ArticleBody.tsx` and `app/claims/[id]/page.tsx`, claims with zero evidence records display an explicit visual indicator and explanatory copy noting that the claim is anchored but not yet evidenced. The accompanying unit test in `src/domain/view.test.ts` validates that every live claim's evidence count accurately matches its citing evidence records across all cases. No content records, citations, or reserved constitutional files are modified.

The diff only adds a derived evidenceCount on ClaimView, surfaces an honest empty state when a claim has zero admitted evidence records (article margin note and unfeatured claim page), and tests that the count matches loaded evidence citing each claim. No content, citations, assessments, AGENTS.md, or checks are altered. The copy correctly reflects §3.6 (a source is not evidence) without fabricating provenance or weakening ratification. Complete diff, no omitted files, no runs to audit.

This is a presentational/transparency change with no content edits, no citations, locators, or provenance added — the citation verification confirms nothing was added under content/. It strengthens the constitution's epistemic display rules rather than weakening any check: it makes visible (§3.6, §3.9) on the claim page and in article margins when a claim rests on a source anchor with zero admitted evidence records, exactly the deficiency the PR says prior panel objections targeted. The diff is complete (no omitted files), carries no run records, touches no AGENTS.md, and the evidenceCount computation is backed by a test covering every live claim of every case. The hover/title text accurately restates §3.6 and misattributes nothing; provenance stamps are unaffected.