The diff adds a derived /panel page plus a small VerdictDot primitive, a domain module (src/domain/panel.ts) and tests; every displayed figure is computed at build time from existing ledger records (assessment runs, ratification standings, harvested arbiter verdicts, case history), so no citation, locator, or provenance is authored or invented (§3.8, §10). Verification/ratification honesty is preserved rather than weakened: standings render explicit 'ratified/contested/unratified' chips with the agreeing/panel count and reason, the house draft is shown as a distinct hollow ring, and the dissent gallery displays each seat's divergent verdict and reasoning instead of hiding disagreement (§3.15, Phase-1 'do not imply AI assessments are reviewed human conclusions'). AGENTS.md is untouched; DECISIONS.md receives a single appended entry consistent with its append-only rule, and the ops feed openly records PR #55 as 'parked by panel, founder merged anyway' rather than concealing an override. No check is relaxed — no CI, ratification, or quarantine logic is modified; quarantined replies are surfaced, not suppressed. The PR body's framing claims ('117 tests pass') were treated as untrusted assertions, not relied on. Remaining nits (VerdictDot conveys state via title-only rather than aria-label; percentage seat metrics over a small n edge toward false precision under §3.13) are ordinary imperfections, not violations.

The change adds a /panel page and related domain logic that surfaces governance data (ratifications, cross‑model disagreements, arbiter records, quarantines) derived from existing repository records. It does not alter AGENTS.md or any epistemic or governance rules, nor does it weaken validation or ratification mechanisms; it is a read‑only aggregation over existing assessments, case histories, and governance harvests. No citations, sources, or provenance locators are invented or modified; the code only reads from loadAllCases, loadArbiterRecords, and the filesystem to construct summaries, and tests verify internal consistency (e.g., symmetric pairwise agreement, bounded ops feed). The new UI carefully distinguishes "house draft" from seat verdicts and does not present AI output as human review, aligning with §3.9 and §3.15. Because all outputs are computed from already‑versioned data and no published judgments are silently rewritten, the append‑only and provenance requirements remain intact. Accordingly, the PR complies with the constitution.

The PR successfully implements the /panel page, which directly advances the project's product identity as a transparent, AI-operated experiment (§2). All data logic is properly contained in domain functions that operate strictly on the ledger at build time, adhering to the static-site and one-way flow constraints (§4). The interface additions (VerdictDot, cross-model panel link) reveal AI involvement clearly without introducing unlabelled scores or personality-focused arguments (§7).

The diff adds a build-time /panel view plus links and one append-only DECISIONS.md entry; it does not touch AGENTS.md or any ratification/CI gate. panel.ts only derives standings, dissent, seat tallies, and an ops feed from existing loaders, harvested arbiter records, case history, and quarantine directory names — no new citations, locators, or authored assessments. The UI keeps house drafts visually distinct (hollow ring, status chips, reasons) from seat verdicts and labels contested/unratified cases as such, so it does not pass an unratified draft off as ratified. Quarantine rows expose folder names and a canned fail-closed note, not confidential reply bodies. Color dots and model-seat stats are presentation of existing ledger fields, not a check-weakening or a fabricated record.

The page is purely derivative: every section (standings, dissent gallery, seat records, ops feed) is computed at build time from existing ledger records — loadAllCases, latestCheckPerModel, crossModelSummary, loadArbiterRecords, case history — so nothing is authored and nothing can drift from the record, which serves §3.14 and §3.15's inspectability mandate. Ratification status is displayed honestly per case (ratified/contested/unratified chips, hollow ring for the house draft), and the dissent gallery plus the '#55 parked — founder merged anyway' entry enact §3.15's requirement that disagreement never publish silently. No citations, locators, or sources are created at all, so §3.8 fabrication risk is absent; the quarantine entries describe failures generically without exposing contents. AGENTS.md is untouched; the DECISIONS.md change is a single appended entry, matching its append-only convention and the §9 documentation duty. The VerdictDot color coding carries title labels and rides beside existing text badges/labels in the site's established palette — a design choice, not the unlabelled red/green moral coding §7 warns against. No CI, schema, or gate logic is modified, so the §3.15 checks are not weakened; tests cover the new derivations, and no files were omitted from review.