The diff is purely presentational: it deletes the aggregate `/research` page component, its nav entry in `src/config/site.ts`, and the homepage link. No content files, sources, citations, locators, verification labels, or assessment overlays are touched, so §3.8, §3.14, and the fabrication prohibitions are not implicated. It does not touch CI, schema validation, ratification, or parking machinery, so it is not a §3.15 check-weakening; AGENTS.md is untouched. Per-case decisive tests and 'what would change our mind' material live in each case's `research` records (which the deleted page merely aggregated via `loadAllCases()`), so §7's prominence requirement is still served on case pages. The PR body's 'Founder call' assertion is untrusted and I give it no weight, but no rule requires founder authorization for a reversible, non-normative UI removal, and this panel's review is itself the required concurrence. The only residual risk is stale inbound links to `/research/` from files not in this complete diff, which is a routine build concern rather than a constitutional violation.

The change removes a UI page and its navigation links without touching any content, epistemic records, or provenance. No claims, sources, evidence, or assessments are added, altered, or deleted, so rules about atomic claims, provenance, verification labels, or append-only assessments are not implicated. The PR does not modify AGENTS.md or any constitutional safeguards, nor does it introduce mechanisms that could weaken multi-model checks or content validation. The removed page aggregated existing per-case research opportunities but did not itself constitute or alter evidential judgments. With no omitted files and only route/config changes in the diff, there is no sign of fabrication, mislabeling, or confidentiality issues. Therefore, the change complies with the constitution.

The PR removes the global 'Price of Truth' aggregation page and its navigation links. This is a structural change to the site's interface that does not alter any underlying domain data, evidence, or citations. The per-case research agendas are untouched, preserving the requirement to make 'what would change our mind' prominent (§7), and no epistemic or procedural rules are violated.

The complete diff only deletes the global /research aggregator, its homepage link, and the matching nav item. It does not edit AGENTS.md, content records, citations, provenance, assessments, or the ratification/CI checks in §3.15. Per-case research objects and UI are untouched in the shown files, so the mission link from cases to decisive tests remains. Removing a cross-case index is an ordinary product/nav choice, not fabrication, check-weakening, or presentation of an unratified judgment as ratified. Omitted-files is empty, so nothing else in the change is hidden.

The diff is a pure deletion: it removes the global /research aggregation page (app/research/page.tsx), its nav entry in src/config/site.ts, and a homepage link, while per-case research agendas remain untouched according to the PR body and nothing in the diff contradicts that. No content files, citations, locators, provenance, assessments, or published judgments are added or altered, so §3 epistemic rules (real citations, exact provenance, append-only assessments) are not engaged. No CI checks, schemas, or ratification machinery are weakened (§3.15), and AGENTS.md is not edited. Removing a UI aggregation page is a product/IA decision, not a consequential epistemic judgment, and the underlying ResearchOpportunity data stays published on each case page, so no evidence or 'what would change our mind' material is being suppressed. The diff is complete (no omitted files) and internally consistent.