{ "selection": "Four purposively selected saved target responses, including a higher-scoring response. Examples establish that failures occurred; they do not estimate their frequency.", "examples": [ { "file": "data/s3/judgments/365a99b6cba7ca83.json", "issue": "Describes facial features and hands on the belly when the photograph is of the back.", "record": { "shared_elements": [ "carved relief on an upright stone slab/pillar", "horizontal banding of forms", "some schematic curvilinear shapes near the top" ], "element_similarity": "1", "relationship_similarity": "1", "arrangement_similarity": "1", "style_similarity": "1", "gestalt_similarity": "1", "overall": "2", "justification": "Both are upright stone monuments with relief carving arranged in horizontal registers, but the actual subject matter differs sharply: A depicts a series of stylized animals (birds with long necks, quadrupeds) in a schematic naturalistic style, while B depicts a single blocky anthropomorphic figure with facial features and hands meeting at the belly, typical of ancestor-figure statuary. The correspondence is limited to the generic fact of carved figural relief on a stone slab, not to any specific shared motif, posture, or relationship between elements.", "a": "anatolia_ppn_p43full", "b": "rapa_nui_0113", "model": "sonnet", "set": "target", "usage": [ 2974, 998 ] } }, { "file": "data/s3/judgments/6ee332d3697c95e5.json", "issue": "Reversed-order judgment again describes a face on the back view.", "record": { "shared_elements": [], "element_similarity": "0", "relationship_similarity": "0", "arrangement_similarity": "0", "style_similarity": "1", "gestalt_similarity": "0", "overall": "0", "justification": "Image A shows a monumental anthropomorphic figure with a stylized face, arms, and abstract belt/loincloth carving with no narrative scene, while Image B shows a carved slab depicting multiple distinct animal figures (birds, quadrupeds) arranged in registers with geometric banding. There is no correspondence in the kinds of elements depicted, their relationships, or arrangement; the only faint similarity is that both use relief carving on stone in a somewhat schematic manner.", "a": "rapa_nui_0113", "b": "anatolia_ppn_p43full", "model": "sonnet", "set": "target", "usage": [ 2974, 234 ] } }, { "file": "data/s3/judgments/5ba6c204f1653e9d.json", "issue": "Claims no identifiable animals on the moai, contrary to source descriptions and visible birdman reliefs.", "record": { "shared_elements": [ "tall standing monolithic pillar/figure carved in low relief", "circular disc set on the body", "horizontal band(s) crossing the body", "sinuous serpent-like or curved linear motifs", "paired symmetrical motifs across the upper zone", "schematic anthropomorphising of the block (head/shoulder zone above, body below)" ], "element_similarity": "2", "relationship_similarity": "2", "arrangement_similarity": "2", "style_similarity": "2", "gestalt_similarity": "2", "overall": "4", "justification": "Both surfaces treat a tall block as a schematic body carrying shallow relief organised in stacked zones, with a prominent circular disc on the torso, a horizontal band or belt below it, sinuous serpentine lines, and paired symmetrical motifs across the upper register. But A's content is dominated by clearly readable animals in profile (quadrupeds, a long-necked bird, a snake) and small human-like figures with a fringed band, whereas B's carving is almost entirely abstract curvilinear and mask-like forms with no identifiable animals, so the shared traits are largely generic monolith-decoration conventions rather than a common specific scheme.", "a": "anatolia_ppn_p43full", "b": "rapa_nui_0113", "model": "opus", "set": "target", "usage": [ 2974, 1004 ] } }, { "file": "data/s3/judgments/b32bf2365e8fe97a.json", "issue": "A 6/10 response describes hands with elongated fingers meeting at a belt on Pillar 43. That arrangement is not visible on this photographed surface; a higher score does not repair its reading.", "record": { "shared_elements": [ "tall upright anthropomorphic pillar/stela with carving on its broad front face", "upper register of repeated relief motifs arranged in a row across the top block", "arch-like / loop-shaped repeated forms in the top register", "circular or disc motif on the body", "horizontal band with chevron/zigzag or repeated-stroke pattern crossing the shaft (belt-like)", "schematic bent limbs/arms rendered in low relief on the front", "small animal or creature figures in relief" ], "element_similarity": "2", "relationship_similarity": "2", "arrangement_similarity": "2", "style_similarity": "2", "gestalt_similarity": "2", "overall": "6", "justification": "Both surfaces present a monolithic upright anthropomorphic body carved in shallow relief with the same vertical scheme: a row of repeated, arch-like/looped motifs across the top register, then bent limbs and a disc or rounded motif on the torso, then a horizontal belt-like band filled with chevron or repeated-stroke pattern, with smaller creature forms below. The biggest differences in content are that B's upper register is clearly populated by identifiable animals and hands with elongated fingers meeting at the belt, while A's motifs are heavier, bulbous and more abstract (a prominent ringed disc as a pectoral and mask-like head-zone bands), so the specific inventory of creatures and attributes does not match closely.", "a": "rapa_nui_0113", "b": "anatolia_ppn_p43full2", "model": "opus", "set": "target", "usage": [ 2999, 1219 ] } } ], "circulating_illustration": { "path": "docs/img/gobekli_moai_poster.jpg", "sha256": "0860c023b33a8a6c59ceca5d1f45ca64878a45dd85f581028ed8b75811b22b7e", "status": "Illustration differs from photographed carving. Creator and production method unresolved; not an input to the recognition diagnostic." } }