The Aeon Before Ours · claim CCC-C508 · Observation rung · The Hawking-points claim
Instrumental noise does not contribute significantly to the Hawking-point gradient statistic at the scales searched: adding Planck half-difference maps to the simulations does not alter the estimated probability distributions (Jow & Scott 2020).
source anchor
[p. 4], §2
“instrumental noise does not contribute significantly to the HP signal”
Evidence
No evidence records attached yet — this claim is held on its source anchor alone: the ledger knows where the proposition is stated and has admitted no observation behind it. A source is not evidence.
an honest empty state
This claim is in the ledger but not in the current edition's featured set. Nothing here has been assessed — that absence is information, not an oversight.
Still missing: plain-language gloss, credibility assessment, diagnosticity assessment, strongest objection, what would change our mind. A claim gains them when an edition features it and the edition's adopted assessment supplies the full treatment — a decision the panel reviews, not a field anyone flips.