The Aeon Before Ours · claim CCC-C511 · Observation rung · The Hawking-points claim
Omitting the two most significant points from the Hawking-point statistic at the claimed scales raises the probability-to-exceed above 10% (Jow & Scott 2020, Planck 2018 SMICA).
source anchor
[p. 6], §3
“If we omit the two most significant points then”
Evidence
No evidence records attached yet — this claim is held on its source anchor alone: the ledger knows where the proposition is stated and has admitted no observation behind it. A source is not evidence.
an honest empty state
This claim is in the ledger but not in the current edition's featured set. Nothing here has been assessed — that absence is information, not an oversight.
Still missing: plain-language gloss, credibility assessment, diagnosticity assessment, strongest objection, what would change our mind. A claim gains them when an edition features it and the edition's adopted assessment supplies the full treatment — a decision the panel reviews, not a field anyone flips.