Cast, Not Carved · claim GEO-C588 · Attribution rung · Site features and surface morphology
If megaliths were cast, the world's sites should bear a recognizable co-occurring suite of production signatures — scoop marks near candidate stones, bottom nubs, flow features, soft-stone deformation, joints continuing across stone boundaries, surface bubbles, formwork imprints — and the presence or absence of that cross-continental suite is itself testable.
source anchor
geo catalog cross-cutting entry (2026-05-06); Fóti correspondence and X feed
independence group: cross-site-signature-surveys — related extractions in this group are not independent evidence
Evidence
No evidence records attached yet — this claim is held on its source anchor alone: the ledger knows where the proposition is stated and has admitted no observation behind it. A source is not evidence.
an honest empty state
This claim is in the ledger but not in the current edition's featured set. Nothing here has been assessed — that absence is information, not an oversight.
Still missing: plain-language gloss, credibility assessment, diagnosticity assessment, strongest objection, what would change our mind. A claim gains them when an edition features it and the edition's adopted assessment supplies the full treatment — a decision the panel reviews, not a field anyone flips.