Skip to the content
Aletheia

State, Not Scar · claim VASO-C036 · Observation rung · The phenomenon at the fingertip

The Doppler resistivity index of arteries near upper-trapezius sites does not differ between active trigger-point, latent trigger-point and palpably normal sites.

Not featured in the current editionAI-extractedorigin: report 2026-09-09-report-vasocomputation-023157

source anchor

PMC3493620 author manuscript, Results, Doppler paragraph (via open-access PMC copy)

“No differences in RI values were detected between normal”

Evidence

Supports· moderateVASO-E024

Ballyns 2011: resistivity index did not differ between active, latent and normal sites

what the source states
The source states that "No differences in RI values were detected between normal", latent and active sites, and that "the PI was not a good classifier of active, latent, or normal sites because of the large variance."
what we infer
A negative result recorded in its own right: one of the two Doppler indices shows no difference, and the other does not classify sites. The vascular signature at trigger points is partial, not categorical.
limitations
  • Within-patient comparison in symptomatic subjects; the authors attribute the similarity partly to proximity of normal sites to trigger points.
Jeffrey J. Ballyns (2011)AI-verified citation

an honest empty state

This claim is in the ledger but not in the current edition's featured set. Nothing here has been assessed — that absence is information, not an oversight.

Still missing: plain-language gloss, credibility assessment, diagnosticity assessment, strongest objection, what would change our mind. A claim gains them when an edition features it and the edition's adopted assessment supplies the full treatment — a decision the panel reviews, not a field anyone flips.