Supports· moderateVASO-E024
Ballyns 2011: resistivity index did not differ between active, latent and normal sites
- what the source states
- The source states that "No differences in RI values were detected between normal", latent and active sites, and that "the PI was not a good classifier of active, latent, or normal sites because of the large variance."
- what we infer
- A negative result recorded in its own right: one of the two Doppler indices shows no difference, and the other does not classify sites. The vascular signature at trigger points is partial, not categorical.
- limitations
- Within-patient comparison in symptomatic subjects; the authors attribute the similarity partly to proximity of normal sites to trigger points.
Jeffrey J. Ballyns (2011)AI-verified citation