The bulk of the diff is new append-only assessment overlay files that never mutate canon claim data and carry the required stamps (runId, model, date, promptVersion) plus explicit `humanReviewed: false` and header comments stating they are unreviewed AI drafts — exactly what §4 and §3.15 require; nothing here is dressed up as a ratified or human judgment. The four cross-model check files are from genuinely different vendors (Gemini/Google, GPT/OpenAI, Grok/xAI, Opus/Anthropic), are flagged `role: check` and 'never displayed as the case narrative', which supports rather than weakens the concurrence gate. The two canon edits are corrections that tighten accuracy: MPI's overview drops the unsupported 'preregistered and adequately powered' description of Walach 2020 (the evidence record reports rebuilt hardware and 10,000 simulations, not preregistration), and orch-or's overview concedes that the conventional mechanism is incomplete for inhaled agents per ORCH-E031 — both cut against, not toward, the featured theses, and both are logged in history.yaml with what changed, why, actor, and aiAssisted (§3.14, §3.11). No citation, locator, or provenance is invented or removed; verification labels and independence caveats (e.g. proponent-adjacent records, within-lab non-independence, unreviewed preprints) are stated throughout, and confidences are plain-language rather than false-precision scores (§3.10, §3.13). AGENTS.md is untouched and no check is reclassified or relaxed; the PR body's 'standing derives on merge' is a claim about process, not an instruction I acted on. Omitted-files list is empty, so I have seen the whole change.

All added assessment files are explicitly labeled as AI-generated, append-only drafts or cross-model checks, with `humanReviewed: false` and clear role metadata, so they do not misrepresent AI outputs as ratified human judgments, respecting §3.14–3.15. The changes do not alter any canon claim, evidence, or source files; they only add new timestamped overlays and update history logs, preserving versioning and append-only assessment behavior per §3.14. No citations, identifiers, or locators are fabricated or modified; references remain internal IDs already defined elsewhere, and the only content edits in overviews (MPI and Orch-OR) are corrections to better align narrative text with existing evidence records, strengthening rather than weakening epistemic checks (§3, esp. §3.8, §3.9). Multi-model check files (Gemini, GPT, Grok, Opus) are clearly marked as independent checks feeding concurrence, not as public-facing narrative, maintaining the constitutional gatekeeping process in §3.15. History entries transparently record what changed, why, and which AI actor did so, in line with the accountability and provenance requirements (§3.14–3.15). There are no edits to AGENTS.md or to any rule-enforcing mechanisms, and no sign of confidential or unverifiable material being introduced. Accordingly, the diff adheres to the constitution’s epistemic and operational constraints.

The proposed changes adhere to the constitution's epistemic and phase-1 rules. The AI-generated assessments are correctly formatted as append-only overlay files, clearly marked as unreviewed drafts, and explicitly list plain-language verdicts rather than false precision numbers. Furthermore, the substantive corrections to the overview markdown files are faithfully logged in the respective history.yaml files, recording what changed, why, and the AI agent responsible, while deferring final authority to the multi-model concurrence gate.

The diff only adds stamped append-only assessment overlays (auto drafts plus mpi check-role files) and two documented overview corrections; it does not edit AGENTS.md, mutate canon claim files, or strip provenance. Every new assessment is labeled a draft, humanReviewed: false, and stamped with runId/model/date/promptVersion, so unratified AI judgment is not presented as ratified or human. The mpi and orch-or overview edits are small observation-level corrections (Walach 2020 was not preregistered; Eger leaves inhaled-agent mechanism unfinished) with matching history.yaml entries that record what changed, why, and which model proposed them for this gate. Internal citations are existing case IDs rather than new invented sources or locators, and nothing in the files weakens §3.15 checks or exposes confidential material.

seat failed: TypeError: fetch failed