5 of 5 seats affirm compliance; no seat finds a violation
Opus 5 (Anthropic)compliesread reasoning
The diff is purely presentational/domain code: a new static route rendering every evidence record of a case, a pure grouping helper, unit tests, and two nav links. No content files, citations, locators, or assessments are touched, and AGENTS.md is untouched, so §3.15's amendment reservation is not engaged. The ledger preserves the constitution's requirements rather than weakening them: direction is explicit and canonical (§3.5), supports and undermines are rendered with identical card structure and equal prominence (§7 symmetry), and the copy explicitly keeps source statement separate from inference (§3.9) while EvidenceCard is reused with its source verification badge intact (§3.8). Sorting is stable and non-mutating of source data (filter creates a new array), and a live-content test asserts every record appears exactly once, so nothing is silently dropped or repaired (§8). The only nit is the non-null assertion on sourceById.get(e.sourceId), which relies on the existing dangling-ID build validation — ordinary imperfection, not a violation. No fabricated records, no confidential material, no check-weakening.
GPT-5.1 (OpenAI)compliesread reasoning
The change is purely in UI and domain-layer helpers for displaying existing Evidence records, plus tests enforcing that every evidence record appears exactly once. It does not modify any content, sources, provenance, verification labels, or assessments, so there is no risk of fabricated citations or hidden provenance (§3.8, §3.15). The new page explicitly emphasizes separation of source statement from inference and explicit evidence direction, which aligns with §§3.5, 3.6, and 3.9. Grouping by direction and ordering by strength is a presentation concern that preserves underlying data and does not reclassify evidence or weaken checks. All edits are outside AGENTS.md and do not touch any governance or CI logic. Therefore, nothing in the diff appears to violate the constitution’s epistemic or process rules.
Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google)compliesread reasoning
The PR successfully implements the evidence ledger requirement without violating any constitutional rules. It adheres strictly to Phase-1 constraints by remaining a statically generated Next.js page (using generateStaticParams) with no new dependencies, servers, or client JS. Furthermore, it explicitly upholds the Interface rule (§7) to 'present supporting and undermining evidence symmetrically' by handling the opposing evidence sets with identical structure and sorting logic within the pure domain layer.
Grok 4.6 (xAI)compliesread reasoning
The diff adds a static /cases/<slug>/evidence ledger, a domain grouping helper with tests, and nav/case-page links. It does not edit AGENTS.md, content records, citations, assessments, or verification labels, and it does not weaken §3.15 checks. Evidence is grouped by the existing direction field in the constitution’s four classes and shown with the same card structure on both sides, which implements §3.5 and §7 symmetry rather than rewriting judgments. No new sources, locators, or confidential material are introduced; generateStaticParams and the live-case invariant only read already-loaded records. Ordinary UI copy and a non-null source lookup are not constitutional violations.
Kimi K3 (Moonshot, via Venice)compliescites §3.5, §3.11, §7read reasoning
The change is a purely presentational addition: a static, server-rendered ledger page that groups each case's existing evidence records by their already-recorded direction (supports, undermines, qualifies, context), reusing the existing EvidenceCard so source links, verification badges, and the source-statement/inference split are preserved. It strengthens §3.5 and §7's symmetry requirement by giving undermining records identical structure and seriousness, and surfaces all negative evidence rather than only highlights (§3.11). The new domain helper is pure, tested, and adds a live-content invariant that every record appears exactly once — this tightens rather than weakens the checks (§3.15). No content, citations, locators, provenance, or assessments are added or altered, so there is no fabrication surface; the non-null assertion on sourceById is backstopped by the build-time no-dangling-ID validation. Ordering supports before undermines in a fixed canonical order is an ordinary editorial choice, not asymmetric treatment, since both groups render with equal prominence and counts. No AGENTS.md edit, no dependencies, no client JS, no confidence material — fully within Phase-1 constraints.
judged against constitution 34cfe8a7ce · aletheia-arbiter-v1 · verbatim record · pull request