Claims

The original correlation-matrix experiments conducted by Lucadou's group (1986–2006) reported significantly more significant correlations between psychological and physical variables in experimental sessions than in control sessions.

The correlation-matrix design was constructed as MPI's own proposed test: by spreading potential effects across many variable pairs with no single outcome channel, it is intended to detect entanglement correlations without enabling signal transmission.

Preregistered and blind-analysis replications of the correlation-matrix experiment have predominantly failed to reproduce the excess-correlation effect.

Generalized Quantum Theory provides a formally explicit extension of complementarity and entanglement beyond physics, and MPI instantiates it for psychophysical systems using pragmatic information as the ordering quantity.

Reported effects in the correlation-matrix program have not remained stable under replication: initially significant patterns weakened, changed sign, or shifted to different variables, cells, or analyses in subsequent studies.

MPI's no-transmission axiom entails, in advance of any data, that anomalous correlations will decline, change sign, or displace whenever an experimental protocol would allow them to be exploited as a stable signal.

Regression to the mean, analytic flexibility, publication bias, and statistical dependence among matrix variables are jointly sufficient to explain the correlation-matrix record — the early positives and the decline — without any anomalous correlation.

Intercorrelation among the psychological variables violated the independence assumptions of the original correlation-matrix analyses, and dependence-aware reanalyses substantially diminish the founding excess-correlation results.

The pattern of early positive results, decline, and displacement in the correlation-matrix program is produced by genuine non-local psychophysical correlations of the kind MPI describes.

As deployed by its proponents, MPI is insulated from disconfirmation: successful replications are read as entanglement correlations and failed replications as the predicted decline, so no feasible outcome of its own nominated experiments is treated as evidence against the model.