Collapse, Not Computation · studies

Studies

Pre-registered comparisons: criteria are frozen and published before any data is collected, so the table cannot be tuned to fit an answer. A pending study is a promise on the record; a superseded one is a correction that stayed visible.

• ORCH-S00120 rows collectedfrozen 2026-08-26 · hash ca78e87d14cc

  The quantitative commitments of the Orch OR literature

  What numerical commitments does the Orch OR literature actually make — collapse/integration times, gravitational self-energy configurations, participating tubulin counts, required versus estimated coherence times, oscillation frequencies, predicted quantitative relations — who supplied each number, on what stated basis, and do the 1996 conformational-qubit and the 2014 collective-dipole formulations make mutually consistent demands?

• ORCH-S0024 rows collectedfrozen 2026-09-01 · hash 4fa792b878fa

  Xenon isotope potency regressed on nuclear spin and atomic mass, from published per-isotope values

  In the published xenon-isotope anesthetic-potency record — decisively Li N, Lu D, Yang L, et al., 'Nuclear Spin Attenuates the Anesthetic Potency of Xenon Isotopes in Mice: Implications for the Mechanisms of Anesthesia and Consciousness,' Anesthesiology 2018;129(2):271–277, plus any earlier or later report giving isotope-resolved potency — does a nuclear-spin coefficient remain separately identifiable when atomic mass number is entered as a covariate, given that in that dataset the spin-bearing isotopes (129, 131) are also the lightest tested?