Skip to the content
Aletheia

Collapse, Not Computation · source record · paper

At the crossroad of the search for spontaneous radiation and the Orch OR consciousness theory

Derakhshani, Maaneli; Diósi, Lajos; Laubenstein, Matthias; Piscicchia, Kristian; Curceanu, Catalina · 2022

AI-verified citationSRC-DERAKHSHANI-2022
identifier / locator
Physics of Life Reviews 42: 8–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2022.05.004
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2022.05.004
verification note
Verified via Crossref and PubMed (PMID 35617922); abstract read directly (2026-08-22 run). The abstract's conclusion is quoted as published: Orch OR "when based on the simplest version of gravity-related dynamical collapse, is highly implausible in all the cases analyzed."
reliability notes
  • Written by the Gran Sasso experimenters themselves, applying their own bound to Orch OR — the authors best placed to know what their result does and does not exclude.
  • The abstract's careful conditional ('when based on the simplest version') is the whole ballgame, and is exactly the qualification McQueen presses.

Evidence drawn from this source

Undermines· moderateORCH-E018

The Gran Sasso experimenters apply their own bound to Orch OR: 'highly implausible'

what the source states
The abstract states that the authors analyze Orch OR against the spontaneous-radiation bounds from the Gran Sasso measurements and conclude that Orch OR, "when based on the simplest version of gravity-related dynamical collapse, is highly implausible in all the cases analyzed."
what we infer
Weighty because of who wrote it: the experimenters themselves, plus Diósi, applying their own result to the theory rather than leaving the inference to others — the people best placed to know what their bound excludes. The conditional in their own sentence carries the whole argument, though, and they wrote it deliberately: "when based on the simplest version." What is excluded is a class of implementations, and the theory's ability to survive by not being one of them is both a legitimate defense and a symptom of underspecification.
limitations
  • Conclusion is explicitly conditional on 'the simplest version of gravity-related dynamical collapse'.
  • An analysis paper applying an existing bound rather than a new measurement.
  • Contested by McQueen 2023 on the question of whether Penrose OR is committed to the version tested.