Skip to the content
Aletheia

Collapse, Not Computation · source record · paper

Underground test of gravity-related wave function collapse

Donadi, Sandro; Piscicchia, Kristian; Curceanu, Catalina; Diósi, Lajos; Laubenstein, Matthias; Bassi, Angelo · 2021

AI-verified citationSRC-DONADI-2021
identifier / locator
Nature Physics 17(1): 74–78. DOI: 10.1038/s41567-020-1008-4
url
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-1008-4
verification note
Verified via Crossref and by reading the publisher's abstract page directly (2026-08-22 run). The abstract's own words confirm the result used here: the measurement "sets a lower bound on the effective size of the mass density of nuclei, which is about three orders of magnitude larger than previous bounds. This rules out the natural parameter-free version of the Diósi–Penrose model." Published online 7 September 2020; issue date January 2021.
reliability notes
  • The highest-quality experiment in this case by conventional standards: a dedicated ultra-low-background germanium measurement at the Gran Sasso underground laboratory, with Diósi himself — co-originator of the model being tested — as a co-author.
  • A null result, and null results of this kind are unusually informative because the prediction was quantitative.
  • Tests a specific stochastic completion of gravity-related collapse, not Penrose's original heuristic criterion. What it rules out is precisely stated in the abstract and should not be overstated (see SRC-MCQUEEN-2023).

Evidence drawn from this source

Undermines· strongORCH-E017

Gran Sasso null result excludes the parameter-free Diósi–Penrose model

what the source states
The abstract reports a dedicated search for the spontaneous radiation predicted by gravity-related dynamical collapse, performed with an ultra-low-background germanium detector at the Gran Sasso underground laboratory, and states: "Our result sets a lower bound on the effective size of the mass density of nuclei, which is about three orders of magnitude larger than previous bounds. This rules out the natural parameter-free version of the Diósi–Penrose model."
what we infer
Methodologically the strongest experiment anywhere in this case, conducted with the model's own co-originator among the authors, and it came out negative. It substantially damages the physics conjunct ORCH-C001 requires. The scope of the exclusion is precisely stated in the authors' own words and should not be inflated: it kills the natural parameter-free stochastic completion, not every conceivable gravity- related collapse theory, and specifically not Penrose's original heuristic ℏ/E_G criterion, which makes no radiation prediction. That qualification is real (see ORCH-E019) and is also exactly the kind of escape that costs a theory its testability.
limitations
  • Tests a specific stochastic master equation; the map from Penrose's geometric argument to that equation is not unique.
  • Constrains a parameter range rather than closing the question — non-Markovian and non-local variants evading the radiation prediction have been proposed.
  • Does not test the ℏ/E_G lifetime scaling itself, which remains unmeasured.