Undermines· strongYDIH-E032
Holliday et al. 2023: the comprehensive refutation
- what the source states
- A thirteen-author cross-disciplinary review concluded the hypothesis fails across every examined domain — impact physics, geology, geochemistry, chronology, ecology, and archaeology — finding no self-consistent physical and stratigraphic case for a Younger Dryas cosmic event: proxy peaks non-reproducible or non-diagnostic, chronologies inadequate for synchrony, proposed impact scenarios physically inconsistent, and the claimed consequences explained by conventional processes.
- what we infer
- The current center of gravity of independent expert assessment. Its force comes from breadth (every evidence line addressed in one place) rather than from new data; the proponents' 2024 "Rejection" and the authors' further "Rebuttal" (both carried in the sources) leave the exchange formally open and substantively where it stood.
- limitations
- Authored substantially by the hypothesis's long-standing critics — thoroughness and partisanship are both real here.
- Answered by Sweatman, Powell & West 2024 (ESR 258: 104960); the authors rebutted (ESR 258: 104961).