Supports· moderateYDIH-E020
Kennett et al. 2015: the Bayesian synchrony model
- what the source states
- Bayesian chronological modeling of radiocarbon dates from boundary sites on four continents concluded the data are consistent with a synchronous Younger Dryas boundary age of 12,835–12,735 cal BP.
- what we infer
- The proponents' formal answer to the chronology audit. "Consistent with synchrony" is weaker than "demonstrates synchrony": the model's force depends on which dates and boundary assignments enter it, which is exactly what critics contest — and the paper carries a 2024 correction (content not reviewed here).
- limitations
- Date inclusion/exclusion rules and boundary assignments were not independent of the event hypothesis (the circularity objection).
- 2024 correction recorded by Crossref; unreviewed.