Skip to the content
Aletheia

Cast, Not Carved · source record · paper

Origins of the sarsen megaliths at Stonehenge

Nash, D. J.; et al. · 2020

AI-verified citationSRC-NASH-2020
identifier / locator
Science Advances 6(31): eabc0133. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abc0133
verification note
Accuracy correction recorded in the geo project: Stone 58's geochemical signature directly matched West Woods, and 50 of 52 sarsens share a uniform profile — stronger than Fóti's 'only a statistical correlation' characterization.
reliability notes
  • Mainstream peer-reviewed provenance study; follow-up: Ciborowski et al. 2024, J. Arch. Sci. Reports.

Evidence drawn from this source

Undermines· moderateGEO-E009

Stonehenge sarsen provenance: Stone 58 matches West Woods

what the source states
Immobile-trace-element analysis found that 50 of 52 Stonehenge sarsens share a uniform geochemical profile, and Stone 58's signature directly matches the West Woods area — identifying the probable source region.
what we infer
For Stonehenge, provenance evidence fits conventional sourcing well. Proponents respond that bulk trace-element methods would give the same result for stone cast from West Woods aggregate — but that response (GEO-C030) is itself an untested methodological claim. Note: the geo project corrected Fóti's "only a statistical correlation" framing; the published match is stronger than he presents.
limitations
  • Bears directly on Stonehenge sarsens, not on the Egyptian or Andean claims.