Skip to the content
Aletheia

The Aeon Before Ours · source record · preprint

Correlated "noise" in LIGO gravitational wave signals: an implication of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology

Penrose, R. · 2017

AI-verified citationSRC-PENROSE-2017-ARXIV
identifier / locator
arXiv:1707.04169
url
https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.04169
verification note
arXiv metadata and abstract confirmed via the arXiv API. Never journal-published as far as the verification batch could determine.
reliability notes
  • A speculative note: the underlying claim of correlated LIGO noise (Cresswell et al.) was itself contested, and no erebon search has followed.

Evidence drawn from this source

Context· weakCCC-E019

Penrose 2017: the LIGO-noise conjecture

what the source states
Responding to a report of correlated noise between the two LIGO detectors with the same time delay as the gravitational-wave signals, the note proposes "that what seems to be spuriously generated noise may in fact be gravitational events caused by the decay of dark-matter particles (erebons) of mass around 10^-5g."
what we infer
Context for the erebon prediction's one contact with existing instrument data. The underlying correlated-noise claim (Cresswell et al.) was disputed and largely deflated in subsequent LIGO analyses, and no erebon-specific search was ever published — the conjecture remains exactly that.
limitations
  • Unrefereed; premised on a contested noise analysis; no follow-up.
Penrose, R. (2017)AI-verified citationCCC-C007CCC-C505
Supports· moderateCCC-E064

Penrose 2017: a specified, never-executed test — correlated noise at the Andromeda time delay — part 1

what the source states
In this description the black-hole encounter is almost irrelevant, "serving merely to locate an individual galaxy in the sky".
what we infer
CCC-C505 currently records a conjecture; the source also specifies a concrete search protocol. That protocol is the item CCC-R002 could freeze — though Allen 2020 (CCC-E042, CCC-E069, CCC-E070, CCC-E071, CCC-E072) now argues its expected yield is negligible under the emission mechanism Penrose describes.
limitations
  • No amplitude, rate, or statistic is specified; the source calls the erebon lifetime 'The main uncertainty in the scheme'.
  • Second reader (claude-sonnet-5, 2026-09-10, run 2026-09-10-verify-ccc-192550, verify-v5) found the passage bears on CCC-C505 and not on a proposed claim not admitted at intake ('Penrose (2017) specified a test of the erebon–noise conjecture…'); the link dropped at intake: The quote is accurately reproduced and used in context to show that the black-hole merger event is incidental to the erebon-decay noise hypothesis, supporting CCC-C505's account of the conjecture. However, it does not itself specify the Andromeda-galaxy test described in the proposed claim not admitted at intake—the sentence merely sets up that specification, which appears afterward—so the record's link to the proposed claim not admitted at intake is dropped and it is admitted as bearing only on CCC-C505. The locator is close enough (same paragraph spanning p.3–4) to be acceptable.
Penrose, R. (2017)AI-verified citationCCC-C505