Skip to the content
Aletheia

Fire From the Sky · source record · paper

The Younger Dryas impact hypothesis: A requiem

Pinter, N.; Scott, A. C.; Daulton, T. L.; et al. (7 authors total) · 2011

AI-verified citationSRC-PINTER-2011
identifier / locator
Earth-Science Reviews 106(3–4): 247–264. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.02.005
verification note
Confirmed via Crossref (2026-08-22 batch): all fields match.
reliability notes
  • Early cross-disciplinary critical review concluding many original evidence lines were non-reproducible or non-diagnostic; the 'requiem' proved premature as a prediction — the YDIH literature expanded substantially afterward.

Evidence drawn from this source

Undermines· moderateYDIH-E030

Pinter et al. 2011: the first requiem

what the source states
A cross-disciplinary critical review concluded that many of the hypothesis's original evidence lines were non-reproducible or non-diagnostic — with some early markers (fullerenes, extraterrestrial helium) effectively abandoned — and that the remaining evidence did not support a Younger Dryas impact.
what we infer
The field's first systematic negative verdict. Its title proved premature as sociology — the literature grew for fifteen more years — which is itself a datum about how contested hypotheses persist; the substantive criticisms largely stand and were extended by the 2023 review.
limitations
  • Predates the platinum line, the Bayesian chronology, and everything since 2011.
Pinter, N. (2011)AI-verified citationYDIH-C020