Skip to the content
Aletheia

The Emptied Amazon · source record · paper

Two thousand years of garden urbanism in the Upper Amazon

Stéphen Rostain; Antoine Dorison; Geoffroy de Saulieu; Heiko Prümers; Jean-Luc Le Pennec; Fernando Mejía Mejía; Ana Maritza Freire; Jaime R. Pagán-Jiménez; Philippe Descola · 2024

AI-verified citationSRC-ROSTAIN-2024
identifier / locator
doi:10.1126/science.adi6317
url
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi6317
verification note
text retrieved and shown to the drafter on 2026-09-17 (run 2026-09-17-draft-pre-columbian-amazon-135349); passages checked by the verify verb
reliability notes
  • Peer-reviewed research article, Science 383(6679):183–189, January 2024.
  • Text read from the author-accepted manuscript deposited at archimer.ifremer.fr (open-access copy via OpenAlex); page numbers below refer to that PDF, not the journal pagination.
  • Primary archaeological study (LiDAR analysis plus two decades of excavation) by the investigating team; interpretive comparisons to Maya, Teotihuacan and Giza are the authors' framing, not measurements.
  • Funding stated: CNRS, UMR8096, French MAEE, IRD, German KAAK, Ecuadorian INPC, Banco Central del Ecuador, SENESCyT; authors declare no competing interests.

Evidence drawn from this source

Supports· strongAMZ-E073

Rostain 2024: Upano platform and road construction dated ca. 500 BCE to 300/600 CE — part 1

what the source states
Archaeological excavations date the Upano Valley "occupation from around 500 BCE to between 300 and 600 CE".
what we infer
Primary dating by the excavating team (almost 70 radiocarbon dates per the supplement); the end-date is a range, not a point.
limitations
  • Author-accepted manuscript; the revised sequence is promised in 'a subsequent paper'.
Supports· strongAMZ-E074

Huapula reoccupation of Upano mounds, 800–1200 CE — part 1

what the source states
Some mounds were "reoccupied after a hiatus by groups of the Huapula culture" between 800 and 1200 CE.
what we infer
Continuity of some occupation into the second millennium at Upano, at lower density; relevant to how long the valley's surfaces were forested before Colonial times.
limitations
  • Reoccupation extent ('some mounds') not quantified.
Context· strongAMZ-E075

Huapula reoccupation of Upano mounds, 800–1200 CE — part 2

what the source states
Huapula ceramic is "characterized by decorations based on the corrugated modality using wavy patterns".
what we infer
Continuity of some occupation into the second millennium at Upano, at lower density; relevant to how long the valley's surfaces were forested before Colonial times.
limitations
  • Reoccupation extent ('some mounds') not quantified.
  • Direction set to "context" (from "supports") by the second reader (claude-sonnet-5, 2026-09-17, run 2026-09-17-verify-pre-columbian-amazon-140447, verify-v6) at intake: The quoted sentence only describes the corrugated, wavy-pattern decoration typical of Huapula pottery; it does not itself assert that mounds were reoccupied by Huapula groups between 800 and 1200 CE, which is stated elsewhere in the supplement. As such the passage identifies/dates the Huapula culture but does not directly support the reoccupation claim, so it functions as context rather than support.
Supports· moderateAMZ-E076

Authors' assessment: Upano is the earliest and largest low-density agrarian urbanism documented in Amazonia so far — part 1

what the source states
Other monumental sites of Amazonia are all more recent than the Upano sites and "significantly less dense in terms of features", and, until proven otherwise, not embedded within such a vast and dense communication network.
what we infer
A comparative claim by the discoverers, explicitly time-bounded ('so far'); the Aquiry peak (AD 100–300, AMZ-C004/E003) overlaps its later phase, so 'earliest' depends on definitions of urbanism.
limitations
  • Authors' interpretive superlative; comparison set is the supplement's four sites.
Supports· strongAMZ-E115

Rostain 2024: platforms and roads built by groups of the Kilamope and later Upano cultures

what the source states
The main text states that the original building of the earthen platforms and roads "was carried out by groups from the Kilamope and later Upano cultures".
what we infer
Cultural attribution by the excavating team, resting on the stratigraphic sequence it re-examined at the Sangay and Kilamope sites; its supplementary text S2 lists the Kilamope as the first mound builders and says the Upano built earthen mounds and were contemporaneous with or successors of the Kilamope.
limitations
  • Author-accepted manuscript; the dating sequence behind the attribution "was recently revised and will be presented in a subsequent paper" (supplementary text S2, p. 23).