Skip to the content
Aletheia

State, Not Scar · the record

The record

How this case was made. Aletheia is operated by AI, and what makes that accountable is that nothing it does is hidden: every run is here with what it proposed, what it admitted, and what it refused with the reason; every change to the case is dated, explained and attributed.

the drafter's rationaleThis edition brings the case within the reader's budget. The judgment is restated, not changed. No record in the packet moves a verdict, so the case verdict (unresolved), every claim verdict, the load-bearing set and the weakest links are the incumbent's.

the whole rationale · edition-2026-09-30-072251

This edition brings the case within the reader's budget. The judgment is restated, not changed. No record in the packet moves a verdict, so the case verdict (unresolved), every claim verdict, the load-bearing set and the weakest links are the incumbent's. The assessment is rewritten field by field within the ceilings, and each header answer now opens with the answer itself. The synthesis keeps the single-record sensitivity (VASO-E020) and names records only beside the claims they are attached to. Two kinds of record are named nowhere in the assessment: provisional records (the relinked essay, report and scanner records) and records drawn from the unverified second essay. Components are restated as six. The electrical nidus becomes its own component, because it carries its own dispute: endplate zone versus tender point. The attention-and-inflammation study stays featured with a full treatment and its incumbent verdict. Selection: three detailed children leave the featured set. The two endplate-noise site findings are carried by their parent claim on the electrical nidus, and the null resistivity index by its parent claim that points differ from their surroundings. Their findings stay in the telling and on their claim pages. Every load-bearing claim, every competing account (latched arteriole, stuck perforator, densification and guarding) and the decisive cruxes remain featured. The article is retold much shorter, as a single pass: phenomenon, instruments, nidus, latch, read path, the three accounts side by side, the breath question, the contemplative maps, what would settle it, and where the case stands. Narration of the case's own revisions and the ledger's internal vocabulary are removed. Claims held only on their sources are told as reports. The breath question is told as a subsection under the three accounts rather than as a fourth account, so the accounts field is unchanged. No research item changed standing, so researchStatus is empty. The question is kept. Measured by the verb: article 7502 → 2906 words, without markup; accounts 3 (incumbent 3).

  • 2026-09-30editionnew assessment; article 7502 → 2906 words; the panel's seats, reading both as a reader would, preferred the candidate (5 for the candidate, 0 for the incumbent, 0 for neither; compare-v1, against edition-2026-09-23-015207); research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$4.33
  • 2026-09-30check5 of 5 seats judged the case blind$3.62
  • 2026-09-23editionnew assessment; article 7455 → 7514 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.53
  • 2026-09-23answeranswer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 1$0.02
  • 2026-09-22editionnew assessment; article 7414 → 7455 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.74

how this edition was chosen

5 AI models read it beside the edition before it, as a reader would: all 5 preferred this one.

a preference among AI readers, not a human review · the verdicts are judged separately, blind · read beside edition-2026-09-23-015207 under compare-v1

Opus 5.5 (Anthropic)preferred this edition, clearlyread it second

B's 243-word header answers and two-paragraph article opening give the claim, where the evidence stands, the rival accounts and the keystone experiment within a couple of minutes. A's headers alone run 1,086 words of dense ledger prose such as 'the one rung where the ledger holds a natural test it has not admitted as an observation on the claim.' B keeps nearly all of A's substance in under 40 percent of the words: the trapezius stiffness and Doppler figures with their caveats, the eleven-of-eleven versus four-of-eleven endplate-zone gradient, the mental-arithmetic result, the arteriole phosphorylation audit, the runners' pressure-only clearance, and the three accounts with their tests. Much of A's extra length is procedural hedging and repetition, including the runners' study returned to in at least five places and lines like 'this case does not spend a record admitted on one claim as a finding on another,' plus a record id ('study VASO-S001') and revision history ('since the observation was split in two,' 'this edition'). A does add some real value, such as the perforator account's ability to absorb pressure-only release, the laser-speckle test and longer what-would-change lists, but not enough to justify a 7,500-word article a ten-minute reader cannot finish; both are current and both state the proponents' strongest case fairly.

what it said should still be fixed

  • Leftover site vocabulary in the header and text ('admitted evidence carries the surroundings,' 'held on their sources alone,' 'this edition') should be replaced with plain statements of what has been measured and what is only asserted.
  • The trapezius imaging paragraph should say the stiffness gradient comes from one laboratory, at sites the examiner had already chosen by palpation, because that limitation bears directly on the reliability dispute the article raises.
  • The perforator section should note that this account, unlike the latch account, can accommodate release by pressure alone and would be tested at the skin with a perfusion camera, so readers do not take the runners' result as weighing equally against both vascular accounts.
GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenAI)preferred this edition, clearlyread it first

A gives the reader the claim, unresolved status, leading alternatives, and decisive time-locked imaging test within a compact header and two opening paragraphs. Its side-by-side accounts treat the latched arteriole, perforator, and guarding/densification explanations seriously, with concrete supporting findings, liabilities, and differing predictions. B contains much of the same useful evidence but costs more than twice as many words, repeats qualifications and research proposals, and burdens a general reader with ledger mechanics such as admitted records, anchors, atomic observations, and study identifiers. A still provides key numerical results and caveats without letting provenance bookkeeping obscure the central question of whether perfusion and stiffness change locally during a felt release.

what it said should still be fixed

  • Replace remaining internal phrases such as “admitted evidence” and “this site has not verified” with direct statements about source quality.
  • Separate the speculative claim about vascular participation in mind more clearly from the narrower muscle-knot hypothesis in the question and early summary.
  • The traditional-medicine section could be shortened further because it contributes little to the ten-minute reader’s assessment.
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Google)preferred this edition, clearlyread it first

Telling A is sized for a ten-minute read (under 3,000 words) while Telling B balloons to over 8,500 words, far exceeding what a reader can digest in one sitting. Telling A explains the biology and evidence cleanly in ordinary prose, whereas Telling B repeatedly clutters its text with site-internal mechanics ('admitted records', 'this ledger holds', ledger splits, and record IDs like 'study VASO-S001'). Telling A delivers the same core physiological debates, competing hypotheses, and testable settlement conditions with far greater punch and economy.

what it said should still be fixed

  • The header answers could more explicitly note that 'scar' refers to structural fibrosis before contrasting it with a maintained state.
  • A few stray internal phrases like 'admitted evidence' still linger in the header and should be replaced with natural language.
  • Clarify slightly in the perforator section why the superficial perforator hypothesis struggles to account for deep intramuscular elastography findings.
Grok 4.5 (xAI)preferred this edition, clearlyread it first

A's headers (243 words) and opening quickly state the claim, unresolved verdict with mixed components, the three competing accounts, the seconds-scale local-release crux, and the exact imaging/breath-randomization tests that would settle it, so a ten-minute reader grasps the map before stopping. B's headers alone run 1,086 words of dense ledger-speak ('admitted records', 'this edition reads', VASO-S001) and bury the same points under exhaustive qualifications the reader never asked for. A's 2,900-word article stays concrete and plain while covering the same evidence, alternatives, and gaps; B's 7,500 words add little decisive teaching per minute and repeatedly violate plain-language rules with internal vocabulary. Both are current and fair on supporting versus undermining data, but length and readability decide it for the stated reader.

what it said should still be fixed

  • A could tighten the traditional-maps and vasocomputation paragraphs, which still run longer than their evidential weight justifies.
  • A's header 'WHAT IS CLAIMED' could flag the energy-crisis motive in one clause so the reader sees why the vascular accounts remain interesting despite the arteriole mismatch.
  • A might add one plain sentence early noting that population prevalence of the points themselves remains unmeasured, matching the care B gives that gap without B's bulk.
GLM 5.3 Flash (Z.ai, via Venice)preferred this edition, clearlyread it second

Both tellings are current and state the same verdict, crux, alternatives, and settle-it experiments, but B delivers nearly all of A's substance in under 3,000 words versus 7,500, which matters for a ten-minute reader who will not finish A. B's headers and opening establish the claim, the state of evidence, the competitors, and the decisive experiment before the reader could stop, and its body keeps the key numbers (the 0.57/0.36/0.17 cm² gradient, pulsatility 8.3 vs 3.0, the 71.5% palpation confirmation, the 60%/86% clearance rates) and the same balanced caveats A gives. A's extra length buys mostly depth on the population-prevalence record and a longer research agenda — material the instructions say can be left to the ledger — rather than anything that changes what the reader learns. A is not deficient, just priced beyond the reader's budget for what it adds.

what it said should still be fixed

  • B should say explicitly that the frequency of tender points in the general population has never been measured (it implies this but states it less plainly than A does).
  • B's 'The breath question' sits oddly as a subsection under 'Three accounts side by side' though it concerns evidence, not one account; moving it up a level would help.
  • B could note, as A does, that the trauma-relevant inference (a minutes-scale disappearance of an imaged stiff focus) is an inference of the edition rather than a graded finding, to keep the pressure-only lead clearly separated from verdicts.

Run by run

Every run on this case, newest first: what it proposed, what it admitted, and what it refused with the reason the verifier wrote. A candidate that is not on the ledger is here, with why. The dispositions file holds every row.

2026-09-30editionnew assessment; article 7502 → 2906 words; the panel's seats, reading both as a reader would, preferred the candidate (5 for the candidate, 0 for the incumbent, 0 for neither; compare-v1, against edition-2026-09-23-015207); research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$4.33

run 2026-09-30-edition-vasocomputation-071302

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-30check5 of 5 seats judged the case blind$3.62

run 2026-09-30-check-vasocomputation-104542

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-23editionnew assessment; article 7455 → 7514 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.53

run 2026-09-23-edition-vasocomputation-014344

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-23answeranswer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 11 in$0.02

run 2026-09-23-answer-vasocomputation-014335

admitted

  • claiminVASO-C191Such tender points occur commonly across the general population.
2026-09-22editionnew assessment; article 7414 → 7455 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.74

run 2026-09-22-edition-vasocomputation-114127

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-22editionpacket written under proposals/2026-09-22-edition-vasocomputation-114125/ (811741 chars for claude-fable-5-1); nothing sentdry-run$0.00

run 2026-09-22-edition-vasocomputation-114125

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-21reverifyre-verify: promoted 0, appended 2, refused 1, still unread 32 in · 1 failed · 3 provisional$0.46

run 2026-09-21-reverify-vasocomputation-021624

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedBallyns 2011 introduction: 'muscle knots' as a common condition with a cited prevalence estimate

    refused at re-verification: not one observation (The quoted passage accurately reflects the introduction's framing, and the locator is correct, but the sourceStatement bundles three distinct propositions (a cited prevalence figure attributed to Fishbain 1986, a claim about myofascial pain syndrome being a major cause…

  • evidenceprovisionalVASO-E012Even the 'palpable discrete spot' is disputed, not just its mechanism

    still unread on 2026-09-21: source text not retrievable: the source record carries no URL and no DOI

  • evidenceprovisionalVASO-E015Tender-point ubiquity and the missing census

    still unread on 2026-09-21: source text not retrievable: the source record carries no URL and no DOI

  • evidenceprovisionalVASO-E018A whole-body ultrasound platform exists — as a prototype, for composition

    still unread on 2026-09-21: source text not retrievable: HTTP 403

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E108Ballyns 2011 introduction: 'muscle knots' as a common condition with a cited prevalence estimate — part 1
  • evidenceinVASO-E109Ballyns 2011 introduction: 'muscle knots' as a common condition with a cited prevalence estimate — part 3
2026-09-21editionper-month cap: $396.44 spent + $7.17 estimated > $400.00 (config/budget.yaml, crunch caps); nothing was sentfailed$0.00

run 2026-09-21-edition-vasocomputation-021842

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-21editionnew assessment; article 7337 → 7414 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$6.00

run 2026-09-21-edition-vasocomputation-012522

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-21editionre-adopts the incumbent's assessment; article 7283 → 7337 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$4.12

run 2026-09-21-edition-vasocomputation-002018

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-21answeranswer: promoted 1, appended 2, refused 2, still unread 03 in · 2 failed$0.16

run 2026-09-21-answer-vasocomputation-021449

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedCroft 1994: high tender-point counts in people reporting no pain — part 2

    refused at the answer's re-reading: second reader rejected (ofTheCompound): The quote and locator check out and, as the prior reader corrected, this passage only bears on VASO-C001 as background context about tender-point-count distributions, not as direct support for commonness of occurrence. But the record's title i…

  • claimfailedDiscrete, exquisitely tender, palpable points occur commonly in human muscle and fascia across the general population.

    refused at the answer's re-reading: not atomic (Without retrievable source text, quoteInContext, statementSupported and locatorSupported cannot be assessed and are reported false per instruction. The statement bundles two separable propositions—that discrete tender points occur, and that they are common across the gen…

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E082Croft 1994: high tender-point counts in people reporting no pain — part 1
  • claiminVASO-C190Discrete, exquisitely tender points can be palpated in human muscle and fascia.
  • claiminVASO-C191Such tender points occur commonly across the general population.
2026-09-21answeranswer: promoted 2, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 02 in$0.05

run 2026-09-21-answer-vasocomputation-012456

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E082Croft 1994: high tender-point counts in people reporting no pain — part 1
  • claiminVASO-C001Discrete, exquisitely tender, palpable points occur commonly in human muscle and fascia across the general population.
2026-09-21answeranswer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 01 in$0.00

run 2026-09-21-answer-vasocomputation-002017

admitted

  • claiminVASO-C001Discrete, exquisitely tender, palpable points occur commonly in human muscle and fascia across the general population.
2026-09-20—4 row(s) written by session_01AiXD4y5Y91KC7iM3uBhWmu, which left no run recordno run record1 failed · 3 in

rows name session_01AiXD4y5Y91KC7iM3uBhWmu; no run record exists for it, so its verb, outcome and cost are not known — the rows themselves are the record

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 1

    not one observation — three findings in one record; split by the operator into VASO-E084, VASO-E085, VASO-E086, answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E084Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 1

    a part of VASO-E073, split by the operator; the quote located verbatim in the Europe PMC full text

  • evidenceinVASO-E085Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 2

    a part of VASO-E073, split by the operator; the quote located verbatim in the Europe PMC full text

  • evidenceinVASO-E086Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 3

    a part of VASO-E073, split by the operator; the quote located verbatim in the Europe PMC full text

2026-09-20verifyadmitted 1 claims, 18 evidence, 2 sources, 1 research; 18 refused; 1 correction(s) applied22 in · 18 failed$1.99

run 2026-09-20-verify-vasocomputation-113521

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: most palpated gastrocnemius trigger points undetectable by palpation and elastography after one compression course, none recurring at 24 hours

    not one observation (The quotes are accurate and the locator is correct, but the claim VASO-C011 specifically concerns objective release occurring within seconds, whereas this study's 'release' happens only after a full compression course (up to three 30-s bouts with 10-s rests, reassessed afterward), a minutes-scale…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: pressure with no breathing instruction sufficed to make most trigger points undetectable

    not one observation (The quotes accurately reflect the pressure-only protocol and the 75/103 elimination result, and using this to undermine a claim that pressure alone never releases a knot is directionally sound. However, the sourceStatement bundles two separable propositions: (1) that no breathing instruction/manip…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: objective disappearance of trigger points under pressure alone, without the breath component

    not one observation (The quotes are accurate and correctly located in the Abstract/Methods, and the disappearance rate is fairly reported, but the record bundles two distinct findings (disappearance rate and pain-score decline) into one sourceStatement, so it is not atomic. More importantly, this protocol (multi-round…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: active trigger points larger, stiffer and more painful than latent ones; latent ones cleared more often after one round

    not one observation (The quotes are accurately drawn from the Results/Table 2 and Discussion sections and reflect the authors' own findings in context, and the observations do bear on VASO-C005's stiffness component since active MTrPs showed significantly higher stiffness ratios relative to adjacent tissue than latent…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims

    not one observation (The quotes and figures (active vs. latent size/stiffness/pain differences, session counts, and the authors' speculative fibrosis remark) are accurately drawn from Table 2 and the Discussion at the cited locators, and 'context' is a fair label given the mismatch in muscle, method and active/latent-…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: about a quarter of palpated hard spots had no imaging correlate

    not one observation (The quoted material and percentages are accurate and in context, and the diagnostic-concordance findings do bear on whether palpable tender points are discrete, reliably identifiable entities, qualifying VASO-C001. However, the sourceStatement bundles several distinct facts (mean palpation vs. ult…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: no gold standard for detecting trigger points; palpation variability the authors' stated reason for adding imaging

    not one observation (The quotes on absence of a gold standard and palpation's inter-observer variability are accurately drawn from the Discussion and correctly framed as the authors' own rationale, and the 71.5% confirmation figure and limitation note are also correctly located; the passage genuinely supports VASO-C03…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: no Doppler was performed, so the order of perfusion and stiffness change was not observed

    not one observation (The quoted limitations text (no Doppler performed, cine loops not archived) is accurately drawn from the Limitations section and correctly used as evidence of an absent measurement rather than a finding, making 'context' the right direction toward VASO-C073. However, the sourceStatement bundles th…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: the authors' reperfusion rationale for compression is stated, not measured

    not one observation (The quotes are accurate and correctly framed as an unmeasured, cited mechanistic statement rather than this study's own finding, so treating it as context toward the latch-bridge claim is appropriate. However, the sourceStatement bundles three distinct propositions—the discussion's ischemia-reperf…

  • evidencefailedCroft 1994: median tender-point count six in women and three in men

    not one observation (The quote and locator check out and both claims about sex-specific median tender-point counts are correctly supported, but the sourceStatement bundles the sex-specific median finding together with a separate, unrelated finding about pain-status and pain-distribution differences in tender point cou…

  • evidencefailedCroft 1994: depression, fatigue and sleep scores rise with tender-point count, independently of pain

    not one observation (The quotes are accurate and in context, the locator (abstract Results/Conclusions) is correct, and the abstract does support both claims about tender-point counts tracking distress and sleep problems. However, the sourceStatement bundles multiple separable propositions (depression/fatigue trend, i…

  • evidencefailedCroft 1994: the examined subsample was selected on reported pain, so the survey cannot speak to universality

    not one observation (The sourceStatement bundles two separate factual claims: the selection criterion for the 177-subject exam sample, and a separate observation that the abstract does not report the proportion with zero tender points. These are independently verifiable propositions joined together rather than one ato…

  • evidencefailedCroft 1994: high tender-point counts in people reporting no pain

    not one observation (The quote is accurately drawn from the Results in the abstract and the locator is correct. However, the sourceStatement bundles two distinct empirical findings (the two no-pain individuals with high tender-point counts, and the separate finding that most chronic-widespread-pain subjects had fewer…

  • claimfailedIn amateur runners, most palpated gastrocnemius trigger points become undetectable by both palpation and strain elastography within a single session of ischemi…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported, relevant): The quotes are accurate to their locators, but the statement adds a detail ('without breathing instruction') that the source never addresses, so it is not actually supported by the anchored passages. The statement also bundles two separate claims (trigg…

  • claimfailedGastrocnemius trigger points that become undetectable after ischemic compression do not recur at 24-hour follow-up. (True if palpation and elastography one day…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quotes accurately reflect the source's finding that eliminated MTrPs did not recur at 24-hour follow-up, correctly located in the Results and Abstract. However, this observation about recurrence rates after compression therapy does not bear on the case question, which…

  • claimfailedLatent gastrocnemius trigger points are eliminated after a first round of ischemic compression at a higher rate than active ones. (True if the proportion of la…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quotes accurately report that 86% of latent versus 60% of active trigger points were undetectable after one compression round, correctly located and stated. However, this differential-elimination-rate finding does not bear on the case's central mechanistic question of…

  • claimfailedActive gastrocnemius trigger points are stiffer relative to surrounding muscle on strain elastography than latent ones. (True if the mean stiffness ratio of ac…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quotes accurately reflect the source's finding that active MTrPs have higher stiffness ratios than latent ones, and the locators are correct. However, this finding about the palpation-based active/latent classification correlating with elastographic stiffness does not…

  • claimfailedAbout a quarter of hard spots palpated as gastrocnemius trigger points in runners are not confirmed as trigger points by B-mode ultrasound and strain elastogra…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quotes accurately reflect the source's report that elastography confirmed about 71.5% of palpated hard spots as trigger points, matching the anchored proposition; but this finding is about diagnostic concordance between palpation and imaging, not about the underlying p…

admitted

  • sourceinSRC-LANDFALD-2025Ultrasound elastography to guide compression therapy for gastrocnemius trigger points in runners
  • sourceinSRC-CROFT-1994Population study of tender point counts and pain as evidence of fibromyalgia
  • claiminVASO-C181In a community general-practice sample examined with the 18-site tender-point count, some subjects reporting no pain had eleven or more tender points. (True if…
  • evidenceinVASO-E067Landfald 2025: pressure with no breathing instruction sufficed to make most trigger points undetectable — part 3
  • evidenceinVASO-E068Landfald 2025: active trigger points larger, stiffer and more painful than latent ones; latent ones cleared more often after one round — part 1
  • evidenceinVASO-E069Landfald 2025: active trigger points larger, stiffer and more painful than latent ones; latent ones cleared more often after one round — part 2
  • evidenceinVASO-E070Landfald 2025: active trigger points larger, stiffer and more painful than latent ones; latent ones cleared more often after one round — part 3
  • evidenceinVASO-E071Landfald 2025: active trigger points larger, stiffer and more painful than latent ones; latent ones cleared more often after one round — part 4
  • evidenceinVASO-E072Landfald 2025: active trigger points larger, stiffer and more painful than latent ones; latent ones cleared more often after one round — part 6
  • evidenceinVASO-E073Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 1
  • evidenceinVASO-E074Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 2
  • evidenceinVASO-E075Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 3
  • evidenceinVASO-E076Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 4
  • evidenceinVASO-E077Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 5
  • evidenceinVASO-E078Landfald 2025: no gold standard for detecting trigger points; palpation variability the authors' stated reason for adding imaging — part 1
  • evidenceinVASO-E079Landfald 2025: no gold standard for detecting trigger points; palpation variability the authors' stated reason for adding imaging — part 2
  • evidenceinVASO-E080Landfald 2025: no gold standard for detecting trigger points; palpation variability the authors' stated reason for adding imaging — part 4
  • evidenceinVASO-E081Landfald 2025: no gold standard for detecting trigger points; palpation variability the authors' stated reason for adding imaging — part 5
  • evidenceinVASO-E062Croft 1994: the 18-site tender-point count applied in a community general-practice sample
  • evidenceinVASO-E082Croft 1994: high tender-point counts in people reporting no pain — part 1
  • evidenceinVASO-E083Croft 1994: high tender-point counts in people reporting no pain — part 2
  • researchinVASO-R020Repeat the runners' compression protocol with breathing recorded and randomised: free breathing, slow exhale, inhale-and-hold
2026-09-20reverifyre-verify: promoted 3, appended 0, refused 1, still unread 03 in · 1 failed$0.08

run 2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-193207

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedBallyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 4.2 — toward VASO-C183

    refused at re-verification: second reader rejected (relevant): The quoted statistic (AUC 0.79, fair classifier of latent vs normal sites) is accurately quoted and located, but it does not bear on any of the three newly split claims: it says nothing about the active-vs-latent area difference (C185), nothing about the n…

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E090Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 1.3
  • evidenceinVASO-E091Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 2.1
  • evidenceinVASO-E096Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 4.1
2026-09-20reverifyre-verify: promoted 0, appended 13, refused 1, still unread 013 in · 1 failed$0.72

run 2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-190441

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedBallyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites

    refused at re-verification: not one observation (The quoted figures and ROC values accurately reflect the abstract/results text at the stated locator, correctly attributed and unqualified by hedging beyond what the source states, and the record properly flags shared NIH lineage with the Shah paper. The direction (supp…

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E087Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 1.1
  • evidenceinVASO-E088Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 1.2
  • evidenceinVASO-E089Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 1.2 — toward VASO-C182
  • evidenceinVASO-E090Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 1.3
  • evidenceinVASO-E091Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 2.1
  • evidenceinVASO-E092Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 2.2
  • evidenceinVASO-E093Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 2.2 — toward VASO-C182
  • evidenceinVASO-E094Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3
  • evidenceinVASO-E095Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — toward VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184
  • evidenceinVASO-E096Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 4.1
  • evidenceinVASO-E097Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 4.2
  • evidenceinVASO-E098Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 4.2 — toward VASO-C183
  • evidenceinVASO-E099Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 4.3
2026-09-20reverifyre-verify: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 1, still unread 01 failed$0.43

run 2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-182525

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedBallyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites

    refused at re-verification: not one observation (The quoted figures and ROC values match the source and are correctly attributed to the study's findings, and the locator points to the correct Results/Abstract passage. The record correctly supports VASO-C182–184 (exact area figures) and plausibly supports VASO-C005 as…

2026-09-20reverifyre-verify: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 11 provisional$0.00

run 2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-180503

refused, with the reason

  • evidenceprovisionalVASO-E023Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites

    still unread on 2026-09-20: source text not retrievable: bot challenge page served with HTTP 200; Europe PMC full text for PMC3493620: HTTP 500

2026-09-20reverifyre-verify: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 11 provisional$0.00

run 2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-180358

refused, with the reason

  • evidenceprovisionalVASO-E023Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites

    still unread on 2026-09-20: source text not retrievable: bot challenge page served with HTTP 200; Europe PMC full text for PMC3493620: HTTP 500

2026-09-20reportresearch pass (claude-fable-5-1)$5.07

run 2026-09-20-report-vasocomputation-112413

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionper-day cap: $56.86 spent + $7.13 estimated > $60.00 (config/budget.yaml, crunch caps); nothing was sentfailed$0.00

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-211227

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionre-adopts the incumbent's assessment; article 7235 → 7283 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$4.11

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-210316

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionre-adopts the incumbent's assessment; article 7538 → 7235 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$4.35

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-201326

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionnew assessment; article 7508 → 7538 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.69

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-193259

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionnew assessment; article 7516 → 7508 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.58

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-191026

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionnew assessment; article 7391 → 7516 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.51

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-173255

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionnew assessment; article 7375 → 7391 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.29

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-132551

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionnew assessment; article 7172 → 7375 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.39

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-124753

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20editionnew assessment; article 6562 → 7172 words; research agenda: 19 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired$5.29

run 2026-09-20-edition-vasocomputation-115652

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)10 blocked · 1 excluded · 2 failed$3.65

run 2026-09-20-draft-vasocomputation-113013

refused, with the reason

  • researchblockedReport §3 item 5: 'specify the keystone experiment as Landfald's design plus cine archiving, Doppler, a recorded and manipulated breath factor, sham sites and…

    The report's sharpening of the keystone experiment (VASO-R001) and the factorial trial (VASO-R003) — add cine archiving, Doppler over the same region, a recorded and manipulated breath factor, sham sites and a no-treatment arm, following the retrieved study's own Limitations and Future directions — would be a correcti…

    reopen if: The current summary text of VASO-R001 and VASO-R003 is supplied, so that a correction can be written against it.

  • researchexcludedReport §3 item 6: 'retitle the item to "Landfald 2025" and mark that item done; remaining list unchanged'.

    The report asks that VASO-R012 be 'marked done' for the retrieved item. Retitling is proposed as a correction; item status is not a scalar field this pass can set and the item's other five primaries remain unretrieved, so the item stays open. For the founder's call.

    reopen if: The founder wishes the item split so the retrieved primary can be closed separately.

  • imageblockedsources[2] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12647689/figure/Fig2/ retrieved false, 'bot challenge page served with HTTP 200'; article text: 'Creative Commons A…

    Candidate plate from the retrieved study — Fig. 2 (strain elastogram with B-mode of a gastrocnemius trigger point, captioned as approximately six-fold stiffer than adjacent muscle) or Fig. 5 (bar chart of elimination outcomes). The article text shown states the licence (Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDer…

    reopen if: The figure page or file is retrieved and shown, and the ledger's use is confirmed non-commercial and unmodified.

  • sourcefailedsources[3] doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25902-8 retrieved false, 'bot challenge page served with HTTP 200'; sources[0] PMC12647689 retrieved true.

    Drafter named the proposed source 'Ultrasound elastography to guide compression therapy for gastrocnemius trigger points in runners' (Landfald, Podgórski & Olewnik 2025) as the record, which the ledger does not hold. Its reason as written: The publisher DOI page for the runners' study served a bot-challenge page; the…

  • sourceblockedReport 'Considered and not proposed' and Next questions item 3; sources[4] doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.01960.x retrieved false, 'HTTP 403'.

    An Acta Physiologica 2009 paper on the sympathetic vasoconstrictor response at latent trigger points (doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.01960.x) was seen by the report only as a truncated title; the DOI returned HTTP 403, and its authors and content were not seen. Together with the blocked Zhang 2009 skin-blood-flow paper…

    reopen if: The abstract or full text is retrieved with title, authors and results shown.

  • sourceblockedReport §7: 'Wolfe et al., 1995 … the more likely primary for unselected tender-point medians by sex'.

    Wolfe et al. 1995, 'The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population', named by the report as the likelier primary for unselected tender-point counts by sex (VASO-C084–C086); not searched for in retrieved text and no page shown.

    reopen if: The paper's abstract or full text is retrieved with count distributions in an unselected sample.

  • sourceblockedReport §7: 'Croft et al., 1996 … tender-point counts as a population continuum rather than a diagnostic threshold'.

    Croft et al. 1996, 'More pain, more tender points: is fibromyalgia just one end of a continuous spectrum?', named by the report as bearing on VASO-C087–C089 (tender points as a population continuum); no page shown.

    reopen if: The paper is retrieved with text.

  • evidencefailedReport F6 and item 8: 'would anchor VASO-C083 and bear on VASO-C084–C089'. PMC2540791 abstract: outcome measures are tender point count, pain, depression, fati…

    The report treats the community tender-point survey as bearing on VASO-C089 (counts do not track tissue damage). The retrieved abstract measures depression, fatigue and sleep against tender-point count and mentions no tissue-damage measure, so it neither supports nor undermines that claim; nothing can be recorded on i…

    reopen if: The full text of Croft 1994 or another survey is retrieved with a tissue-damage or structural measure compared against counts.

  • sourceblockedReport §7 and 'Considered and not proposed': 'title confirmed, page not reached'.

    Zhang et al. 2009, 'Attenuated skin blood flow response to nociceptive stimulation of latent myofascial trigger points' — re-raised by the report; the archives-pmr abstract page was not accessible and no text shown. Already blocked in the case's declined list; would anchor VASO-C135.

    reopen if: The abstract or full text is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport §7: 'primary for VASO-C170–C172; Landfald 2025 adopts its hypoechoic-focus criterion'.

    Sikdar et al. 2009, 'Novel applications of ultrasound technology to visualize and characterize myofascial trigger points and surrounding soft tissue' — re-raised by the report as the primary for VASO-C170–C172; archives-pmr page not accessible, no text shown. Already blocked in the declined list.

    reopen if: The full text (a PMC author manuscript exists) is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport §6: jprasurg.com not fetched; §7 names the paper.

    Taylor & Palmer 1987, 'The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications' — re-raised as the primary for VASO-C131; search result only, page not fetched (budget exhausted). Already blocked in the declined list.

    reopen if: The paper is retrieved with the perforator count passage.

  • sourceblockedReport §6: science.org not fetched; §7 names the paper.

    Segal & Duling 1986, 'Flow control among microvessels coordinated by intercellular conduction' — re-raised as the primary for conducted vasodilation (VASO-C151); science.org not fetched, no text shown. Already blocked in the declined list.

    reopen if: The abstract or full text is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport §7: 'open access at PMC9464976'; §6: 'the Fede PMC page (web-tool budget exhausted)'.

    Fede et al. 2022, 'Innervation of human superficial fascia' — re-raised as the primary for VASO-C163–C165; the report notes it is open access at PMC9464976 but the page was not fetched before the budget ran out. Already blocked in the declined list.

    reopen if: The PMC full text is retrieved.

2026-09-20answeranswer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 01 in$0.00

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-211226

admitted

  • claiminVASO-C001Discrete, exquisitely tender, palpable points occur commonly in human muscle and fascia across the general population.
2026-09-20answeranswer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 01 in$0.00

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-210316

admitted

  • claiminVASO-C001Discrete, exquisitely tender, palpable points occur commonly in human muscle and fascia across the general population.
2026-09-20answer[content:vasocomputation] research.yaml[17] invalid: [ { "origin": "array", "code": "too_small", "minimum": 1, "inclusive": true, "path": [ "claimIds" ], "message": "Too small: expected array to have >=1 items" } ]; the ledger writes of this run were rolled backfailed$0.00

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-203743

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20answeranswer: promoted 0, appended 11, refused 3, still unread 011 in · 3 failed$0.91

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-192504

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedBallyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3

    refused at the answer's re-reading: not one observation (The quote and AUC figures accurately reflect the abstract/results text, the locator is correct, the record properly flags NIH-lineage overlap, and the passage does support VASO-C005 by showing measurable stiffness-based distinction between active/latent/normal s…

  • evidencefailedBallyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — toward VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184

    refused at the answer's re-reading: not one observation (The quoted phrase and AUC figures (0.9, 0.8, 0.8) match the source's Abstract/Results ROC analysis exactly, correctly located, and the NIH-lineage overlap is properly disclosed. The 'context' direction is defensible since the ROC/AUC classification-strength find…

  • claimfailedActive and latent trigger point sites had significantly larger areas on vibration elastography than palpably normal sites (0.17 ± 0.22 cm²; P < .01).

    refused at the answer's re-reading: not atomic (The quoted sentence appears in Results and is used faithfully, and the normal-site value cited matches the abstract's reported figure, so the anchor is contextually and locator-accurate. However, the statement bundles two separable comparisons—active-vs-normal and latent…

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E100Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — part 1
  • evidenceinVASO-E101Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — part 2.1
  • evidenceinVASO-E102Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — part 2.2
  • evidenceinVASO-E103Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — part 2.3
  • evidenceinVASO-E104Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — toward VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184 — p…
  • evidenceinVASO-E105Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — toward VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184 — p…
  • evidenceinVASO-E106Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — toward VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184 — p…
  • evidenceinVASO-E107Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites — part 3 — toward VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184 — p…
  • claiminVASO-C185Active sites had significantly larger trigger point areas than latent sites (P < .01).
  • claiminVASO-C186Trigger point areas assessed by vibration elastography showed trends similar to those of pain pressure threshold scores.
  • claiminVASO-C187Palpably normal sites had a mean trigger point area of 0.17 ± 0.22 cm² on sonoelastography.
2026-09-20answeranswer: promoted 3, appended 3, refused 4, still unread 06 in · 4 failed$0.84

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-172213

refused, with the reason

  • claimfailedThe area of reduced vibration amplitude on sonoelastography is larger at active trigger-point sites than at latent sites, and larger at latent sites than at pa…

    refused at the answer's re-reading: not atomic (The quoted text appears exactly in the Results paragraph on trigger point areas and is used in the same sense as the source (active > latent > normal in P<.01 comparisons), and the locator correctly points to that paragraph; the proposition also bears on the case's size/…

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 4

    refused at the answer's re-reading: every claim it cites was rejected

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 1

    refused at the answer's re-reading: every claim it cites was rejected

  • evidencefailedLandfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 3

    refused at the answer's re-reading: every claim it cites was rejected

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E074Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 2
  • evidenceinVASO-E077Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 5
  • evidenceinVASO-E085Landfald 2025: active/latent differences in a second muscle as context for the graded-stiffness and fresh/old claims — part 2
  • claiminVASO-C182On sonoelastography, active sites had larger trigger point areas (mean ± SD, 0.57 ± 0.20 cm²) than latent sites (0.36 ± 0.16 cm²).
  • claiminVASO-C183Active and latent trigger point sites had significantly larger areas on vibration elastography than palpably normal sites (0.17 ± 0.22 cm²; P < .01).
  • claiminVASO-C184Active trigger point sites were significantly larger than latent sites on vibration elastography (P < .01).
2026-09-20answerevidence.yaml: replacing VASO-E084 in place would change more than that record; nothing written; the ledger writes of this run were rolled backfailed$0.19

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-165424

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20answer[content:vasocomputation] evidence VASO-E073 references rejected claim VASO-C033 (tombstones must not be linked); the ledger writes of this run were rolled backfailed$0.87

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-162500

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20answerVASO-E084.reviewState is not the value the correction was written against; current: "rejected"failed$0.82

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-152845

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20answeranswer: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 1$0.00

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-132548

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-20answeranswer: promoted 2, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 02 in$0.07

run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-124732

admitted

  • evidenceinVASO-E067Landfald 2025: pressure with no breathing instruction sufficed to make most trigger points undetectable — part 3
  • claiminVASO-C039Sustained pressure alone, without breath manipulation, does not release a knot. (True if pressure-only trials produce no felt or measured release where pressur…
2026-09-19editionnew assessment; article 6427 → 6562 words; research agenda: 18 open, 1 answered, 0 superseded, 0 retired (1 change(s) this run)$5.16

run 2026-09-19-edition-vasocomputation-115913

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09verifyadmitted 50 claims, 6 evidence, 1 sources, 5 research; 36 refused62 in · 36 failed$14.93

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-061156

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedProponent's essay drops the latch as a load-bearing part

    second reader rejected (atomic): The quoted passage appears verbatim on p.29 and is fairly summarized, correctly located, and clearly bears on the vascular-latch claim (C020) as a qualifying proponent reflection, with no undisclosed shared source issue. However, the sourceStatement bundles two distinct propositions—th…

  • evidencefailedEssay restates Lindahl 2017: most common somatic report was tension building then releasing, with positive affect

    second reader rejected (atomic): The quote and locator match the source at p.32, and the record correctly frames this as the essay's restatement of Lindahl et al. 2017 rather than a primary finding, which is noted in the limitations. However, the sourceStatement bundles multiple distinct propositions (the most common…

  • evidencefailedEssay restates Moraska 2013 and Cagnie 2012: local blood-flow rises after compression or needling

    second reader rejected (atomic): The quoted spans on p.30 accurately reflect the Moraska and Cagnie findings as restated in context, including the healthy-volunteer caveat for Cagnie. Locator and independence (flagged as secondary restatement) are fine, and 'context' is a defensible direction since neither study addre…

  • evidencefailedEssay: both roads agree the tender points change within a session — state, not scar

    second reader rejected (atomic): The quoted passage is accurately drawn from p.40 and reflects the essay's own summary of agreement between the two accounts. However, the passage directly asserts the state-not-scar claim central to VASO-C011, so it should be coded as 'supports' rather than merely 'context' — I registe…

  • evidencefailedEssay restates Heine 1988: most classical acupoints sit where a neurovascular bundle perforates the superficial fascia

    second reader rejected (locatorSupported, atomic): The Heine quote appears essentially verbatim at p.19, but the Dorsher figure ('above ninety percent') is stated on p.20, not p.19, so the single locator given does not cover the full sourceStatement. The statement also bundles two separate empirical findings (Heine's…

  • evidencefailedEssay restates the densification model: hyaluronan gel reversed by warmth, acid washout and shear

    second reader rejected (atomic): The quoted passage does appear on p.5 and accurately reflects the essay's speculative densification-model restatement, correctly attributed as the essay's own hypothesis, and it plausibly supports the reversibility claim. However, the sourceStatement bundles several distinct propositio…

  • claimfailedMuscle knots are cutaneous perforators — artery, nerve and lymphatic passing together through a fibrous ring in the superficial fascia — held in a stuck state…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The p.4 quote only introduces the speculative 'suppose the knots are these staples' framing of perforators as a triad in a fibrous ring; it does not itself state or establish the explicit contrast with 'latched arterioles inside skeletal muscle,' which only emerg…

  • claimfailedThe 'stars' felt at release are hyperventilation paresthesias, with perfusion changes that are global, equal at sham sites, and track carbon dioxide rather tha…

    not atomic (The quoted conditional prediction from the 'other road' hypothesis appears at p.35 and is used faithfully as a conditional proposition about the hyperventilation account, and it plausibly bears on the case question by testing an alternative to the vascular-knot model. However, the statement bundles several…

  • claimfailedA dilation begun at one point on an arteriole propagates along the vessel wall upstream toward the feeding vessel at millimeters to centimeters per second, ind…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quoted phrase about ascending conduction at millimeters-to-centimeters per second does appear verbatim on p.6 in the stated context, but the record's added claim that this propagation is 'independent of flow' is not supported by the p.6 passage; that specific…

  • claimfailedFelt releases migrate upstream along a vascular tree and queue at the trunk's fascial entry. (True if the sequence of felt release sites in a session tracks th…

    not atomic (The quote is accurately drawn from p.6 and reflects the essay's own hypothesis about perforator-tree release dynamics, appropriately framed as a testable model claim; it bears on the case's vascular-mind hypothesis chain as background mechanism, so it is relevant. However the statement bundles two distinct…

  • claimfailedThe cutaneous perforator bed does not require an economical latch to hold a knot; tonic sympathetic firing at ordinary metabolic cost suffices. (True if perfor…

    not atomic (The quote at p.27 is accurately used in context: the essay states the superficial perforator bed is tonically constricted by ordinary sympathetic firing at a real metabolic cost, so it needs no economical latch, matching the locator and the source's claim. However, the statement bundles two separable propo…

  • claimfailedThe superficial fascia is a single continuous sheet from scalp to soles, forming one connected potential space. (True if anatomical or emphysema-spread studies…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quoted passage on p.9 does describe the superficial fascia as continuous from scalp to soles, but this fact belongs to the essay's separate 'sheet' hypothesis (the second family), which the author explicitly distinguishes from the vascular-latch 'knot' hypothesis that…

  • claimfailedThe bony attachment lines of the superficial fascia are partial barriers: fluid respects them strictly while air crosses them more easily. (True if radiologica…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quote at p.9 does say fluid respects the bony attachment lines strictly while air crosses more easily, accurately reflecting the source's description of the fascial sheet's behavior at bony anchor lines. However, this detail concerns the second, separate 'sheet' system…

  • claimfailedThe reported 'separation' with a crackle is retinacula cutis septa tearing one at a time. (True if ultrasound during a reported separation event shows septal d…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quoted passage describes the essay's second, structural 'sheet' family (septa tearing, delamination) which the source explicitly distinguishes from the vascular 'knot' family (perforator constriction) that is the actual subject of the case question about latched smooth…

  • claimfailedThe reported 'chains' and 'bumps' moving along a limb or flank are folds in a partly delaminated superficial fascia, which propagate rather than move as materi…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quoted passage on p.9 does describe chain/bump phenomena as propagating folds in a delaminated superficial fascia sheet, matching the record's statement. However, the source explicitly treats this 'sheet' phenomenon as a separate, non-vascular structural system distinc…

  • claimfailedThe reported 'hollowing' is a region of separated fascial plane holding gas or fluid. (True if point-of-care ultrasound over a reported hollow shows a fluid st…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quote and locator match, and the statement accurately reflects the source's hypothesis that 'hollowing' is a separated fascial plane holding gas or fluid, framed as testable via ultrasound. However, this pertains to the essay's 'second system' (the fascial sheet), a di…

  • claimfailedThe reported 'filling' of hollows over about a week is re-adhesion of the fascial layers by fibrin bridging within days and collagen deposition over one to two…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quote is accurately drawn from p.10 and describes fibrin/collagen re-adhesion of the fascial sheet explaining hollow-filling, but this is part of the essay's separate 'second family' (sheet) hypothesis, distinct from the 'first family' vascular-latch/knot mechanism the…

  • claimfailedAbove a threshold of released tethers in a region, the remaining tethers fail in sequence under ordinary body loads until separation reaches the bony anchors,…

    not atomic (The quoted passage at p.11 is accurately used to describe cascading tether failure and irreversibility once a threshold is crossed, and the locator is correct. However, the statement bundles at least three separable propositions: (1) sequential failure of tethers under ordinary loads, (2) irreversibility o…

  • claimfailedAny real gas in soft tissue was admitted from an air-containing space (lungs, mouth and throat, nose and sinuses); tissue does not generate gas. (True if every…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quote and statement are accurately drawn from p.11 and fairly restate the source's claim that soft-tissue gas must be admitted from an air-containing space, but this proposition concerns the essay's separate 'sheet/air' family of phenomena, not the muscle-knot/vascular…

  • claimfailedForceful blowing, sustained tones and cheek maneuvers can force air retrograde up the parotid duct into the gland and cheek planes (pneumoparotid). (True if ca…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quoted passage on p.12 does describe pneumoparotid from forceful blowing and cheek maneuvers, and the statement fairly restates it at the correct locator. However, this passage belongs to the essay's separate 'sheet' hypothesis about air infiltration into fascial plane…

  • claimfailedGas pockets in tissue migrate upward against gravity, fluid pockets move downward, and folds in a sheet are indifferent to gravity, so postural change distingu…

    not atomic (The quote is correctly located on p.13 and accurately reflects the source's 'free test' for distinguishing gas, fluid, and fold-based hollows by posture. However, the statement bundles three distinct propositions (gas rises, fluid sinks, folds are gravity-indifferent) plus an inferential claim about postur…

  • claimfailedA person who has completed the release process has zero rollable knots while retaining all perforators. (True if a blinded examiner with pressure algometry fin…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quote 'no knots left to find' does appear at p.14 and matches the hypothetical endpoint described there, but the record's proposition adds specific verification criteria (blinded examiner, pressure algometry, Doppler showing perforators present with normal fl…

  • claimfailedProlonged manipulation can leave skin nerves hypoesthetic, so tenderness goes unreported where a perforator is still stuck. (True if worked regions in heavy pr…

    not atomic (The quote is accurately drawn from p.15 and matches the source's caveat about a damaged-finder confound. However, the statement bundles multiple distinct propositions - the hypoesthesia mechanism, the resulting underreporting of tenderness, and the parenthetical's compound operational test (light-touch/pin…

  • claimfailedEighty percent of acupuncture points and half of the meridians lie on connective-tissue planes between and within muscles (Langevin & Yandow 2002). (True if th…

    not atomic (The quote appears verbatim on p.20 and is correctly attributed as the essay's report of Langevin & Yandow's (2002) finding, and the locator matches. However, the statement bundles two separate empirical claims - the 80% figure for points and the 50% figure for meridians - which are independently verifiable…

  • claimfailedAnatomical correspondence between trigger points and classical acupoints exceeds ninety percent (Dorsher). (True if the primary comparison reports that figure…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quoted passage at p.20 accurately reports that Dorsher found anatomical correspondence above ninety percent, but the source never specifies a matching rule or methodology for that comparison—it's a secondary summary within Jhong's essay of Dorsher's finding,…

  • claimfailedThe Neijing's sinew channels (jing jin) are described as 'knotting' at bony prominences, the Bladder sinew channel at the back of the head. (True if the classi…

    not atomic (The quote is accurately drawn from p.20 and matches its context describing the Neijing's jing jin knotting at bony landmarks, with the Bladder channel knotting at the occiput. However, the statement bundles two separable propositions: a general claim that sinew channels knot at bony prominences, and a spec…

  • claimfailedPropagated sensation along a channel travels at roughly one to ten centimeters per second, can be halted by pressure or cooling along the line, and is accompan…

    not atomic (The quoted passage at p.21 does describe propagated sensation traveling 1-10 cm/s along meridians, blocked by pressure/cooling, with reported temperature rise, matching the source's context (Chinese acupuncture research, with the essay noting methodology is uneven). The locator is correct and the propositi…

  • claimfailedUltrasound-guided hydrodissection of saline around a perforator at its fascial ring releases the knot in seconds without breath or pressure. (True if the tende…

    second reader rejected the anchor (quoteInContext, statementSupported): The source passage explicitly frames hydrodissection releasing the knot as an untested prediction ('should release it... if a knot is motor guarding, saline around a vessel does nothing') proposed as 'the cleanest single test of the identification…

  • claimfailedAbout a third of the nerve fibers of the superficial fascia are autonomic and are concentrated around its vessels (Fede et al. 2022). (True if the primary hist…

    not atomic (The quoted passage appears verbatim at p.31 and is used in the same sense as in the source, correctly attributed to Fede et al. 2022 as reported by the essay. However, the statement bundles two distinct empirical claims \u2014 the quantitative proportion of autonomic fibers (about a third) and their spatia…

  • claimfailedA single dry-needling stimulus in the trapezius raises local blood flow and oxygen saturation at the needled site for about fifteen minutes without changing di…

    not atomic (The quoted passage at p.30 does describe this Cagnie et al. finding accurately, correctly noting it was in healthy volunteers and a needle effect rather than a knot effect, and the locator and content match the record. However, the sourceStatement bundles several distinct claims (blood flow increase, oxyge…

  • claimfailedCutaneous microvascular function declines with age and resting sympathetic tone rises. (True if aging studies show reduced cutaneous vasodilator reactivity and…

    not atomic (The quoted passage does appear on p.23 and is used as the essay intends, an assertion that cutaneous microvascular function declines and sympathetic tone rises with age, though the essay offers this as its own unsupported synthesis rather than a citation of an actual aging study. The statement bundles two…

  • claimfailedUpper-trapezius trigger points appear on ultrasound as discrete hypoechoic nodules stiffer than surrounding tissue with abnormal flow around them (Sikdar et al…

    not atomic (The quoted passage at p. 30 accurately reflects Sikdar et al.'s ultrasound findings on trigger points, and the locator and general description are correct. However, the statement bundles three distinct, independently verifiable imaging findings—nodule discreteness/hypoechogenicity, relative stiffness, and…

  • claimfailedThe second family of reported phenomena (separating, hollowing, filling, chains, air) unfolds over hours and days and does not respond to rolling. (True if pra…

    not atomic (The quote is accurately drawn from p.3 and the record's paraphrase matches the source's description of the second family's timing and non-response to rolling. However, the statement bundles two distinct propositions—an hours/days timescale claim and a non-responsiveness-to-rolling claim—joined by 'and,' so…

  • claimfailedHumans have lost the panniculus carnosus almost everywhere; what remains is the platysma, the muscles of the face and scalp, and the SMAS. (True if comparative…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quoted passage and statement accurately reflect the source's discussion of the loss of the panniculus carnosus in humans, located on p.25, but this comparative-anatomy fact concerns the passive 'sheet' (SMAS/structural) system, not the vascular-autonomic knot/latch mec…

  • claimfailedWhat holds a knot is a composite of three nested memory elements at three timescales: vessel tone (seconds, neural), a hyaluronan collar (minutes to hours, che…

    not atomic (The anchored passage does state a three-part composite (vessel tone, hyaluronan collar, sheet tether) at three timescales, and the locator and quote check out, but the proposition bundles three separately falsifiable claims (a seconds-scale neural mechanism, a minutes-to-hours chemical mechanism, and a day…

  • claimfailedIn a breath-assisted release at a superficial knot, a skin-perfusion flash at the exhale precedes any change in stiffness, with muscle electrical activity unch…

    second reader rejected the anchor (quoteInContext, statementSupported): The p.29 text explicitly frames 'blood first: a skin-perfusion flash at the exhale before any change in stiffness, with muscle activity unchanged' as a predicted signature that follows from the model ('The predictions change accordingly'), not as…

admitted

  • sourceinSRC-JHONG-2026AKnots of Existence Hypotheses
  • claiminVASO-C097A deep inspiration produces a reflex sympathetic constriction of skin arterioles within about two seconds. (True if laser-Doppler or plethysmographic skin flow…
  • claiminVASO-C098A slow exhale lets constricted skin arterioles reopen. (True if skin perfusion at a fixed site rises during slow exhalation relative to inspiration, time-locke…
  • claiminVASO-C099The 'star' or spark felt when a knot releases is reperfusion paresthesia in the skin territory of one perforator's cutaneous nerve. (True if the felt star maps…
  • claiminVASO-C146The passage states that if the sparks are hyperventilation, the perfusion changes are global rather than local to the knot.
  • claiminVASO-C147The passage states that if the sparks are hyperventilation, the perfusion changes are equal at sham sites.
  • claiminVASO-C148The passage states that if the sparks are hyperventilation, the perfusion changes track carbon dioxide rather than the button press marking the felt release.
  • claiminVASO-C101The loose connective tissue around a perforator is rich in hyaluronan. (True if histology or biochemical assay shows elevated hyaluronan in perivascular loose…
  • claiminVASO-C102Practitioners report a strict order: the sheet-separation phase cannot begin at a site until the knots there are gone. (True if practitioner diaries or a prosp…
  • claiminVASO-C149Felt releases migrate upstream along a perforator tree toward its root. (True if the sequence of felt release sites in a session tracks the perforator tree's b…
  • claiminVASO-C150Felt releases queue at the trunk's fascial entry, the root of the tree. (True if, after a session's releases converge, the site where releases accumulate and a…
  • claiminVASO-C151Release runs upstream because a dilation that begins at a branch propagates along the arteriole wall toward the feeding vessel at millimeters to centimeters pe…
  • claiminVASO-C152Release runs upstream because a downstream vessel cannot stay open while the trunk feeding it is shut, so cleared areas come back until something upstream is a…
  • claiminVASO-C105Cleared knot areas recur until an upstream site is also cleared. (True if recurrence rate at cleared sites falls after clearance of the upstream trunk relative…
  • claiminVASO-C106The greater occipital nerve pierces the trapezius aponeurosis beside the occipital artery's emergence through the deep fascia at the superior nuchal line. (Tru…
  • claiminVASO-C107Skin vessels are history-dependent: cold-induced constriction outlasts the cold stimulus. (True if cutaneous flow remains reduced after rewarming for a period…
  • claiminVASO-C153The cutaneous perforator bed does not need an economical hold (latch) to keep a knot held.
  • claiminVASO-C154Prolonged manipulation can leave the skin's nerves hypoesthetic. (True if the passage states that prolonged manipulation can reduce sensation in the skin's ner…
  • claiminVASO-C155When the skin's nerves are hypoesthetic, tenderness is not reported even where a perforator is still stuck. (True if the passage states that a damaged finder f…
  • claiminVASO-C156The two states — true knot-free and damaged finder — separate cleanly. (True if the passage states that these two states are cleanly distinguishable by the lis…
  • claiminVASO-C121A band of connective tissue (the myodural bridge) runs from the rectus capitis posterior minor through the atlanto-occipital interval to the dura mater. (True…
  • claiminVASO-C122Accounts of awakening across traditions and modern first-person reports often describe the decisive moment as a release at the base of the skull. (True if a co…
  • claiminVASO-C123About eighty percent of classical acupoints coincide with sites where a neurovascular bundle perforates the superficial fascia (Heine 1988). (True if the prima…
  • claiminVASO-C157Langevin and Yandow (2002) found that eighty percent of acupuncture points lie on connective-tissue planes between and within muscles.
  • claiminVASO-C158Langevin and Yandow (2002) found that half of the meridians lie on connective-tissue planes between and within muscles.
  • claiminVASO-C159The defining feature of each sinew channel in the text is that it 'knots' (the character jie, to bind or tie) at specific places along its course.
  • claiminVASO-C160The places where the sinew channels knot are bony prominences: the occiput, the mastoid, the cheekbone, the shoulder, the hip, the knee, the heel.
  • claiminVASO-C161The Bladder sinew channel knots at the back of the head.
  • claiminVASO-C162Propagated sensation along a channel is accompanied by a reported rise in skin temperature along the path.
  • claiminVASO-C128Recognized cutaneous nerve entrapment syndromes (anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment, cluneal entrapment, occipital neuralgia, meralgia paresthetica) are discr…
  • claiminVASO-C130Pressure applied during an inhale-and-hold fails to release a knot. (True if pressure trials during breath-hold after inspiration produce no felt or measured r…
  • claiminVASO-C131The human body carries on average 374 cutaneous perforators of half a millimeter or more (Taylor & Palmer 1987). (True if the primary angiosome mapping reports…
  • claiminVASO-C132Inactivating a key trigger point inactivates its satellite trigger points without treating them (Hong & Simons 1993). (True if the primary clinical report show…
  • claiminVASO-C133In the largest study of meditation-related experiences, the most common somatic report was pressure or tension that built and then released (Lindahl et al. 201…
  • claiminVASO-C163The superficial fascia is richly innervated (Fede et al. 2022).
  • claiminVASO-C164About a third of the nerve fibers of the superficial fascia are autonomic (Fede et al. 2022).
  • claiminVASO-C165The autonomic nerve fibers of the superficial fascia are concentrated around its vessels (Fede et al. 2022).
  • claiminVASO-C135Skin blood-flow response to nociceptive stimulation is attenuated over latent trigger points relative to control sites. (True if the primary study shows a smal…
  • claiminVASO-C136Ischemic compression of an active trigger point produces a transient rise in local blood flow measured by an indwelling microdialysis catheter (Moraska et al.…
  • claiminVASO-C166A single dry-needling stimulus in the trapezius raised oxygen saturation at the needled site for fifteen minutes (Cagnie et al. 2012).
  • claiminVASO-C138Needle EMG of equine trigger points records the same spontaneous electrical activity reported in human trigger points. (True if the primary veterinary EMG stud…
  • claiminVASO-C167Cutaneous microvascular function declines with age.
  • claiminVASO-C168Resting sympathetic tone rises with age.
  • claiminVASO-C169The age curves for knot burden and cutaneous microvascular decline have never been laid on top of each other.
  • claiminVASO-C170Sikdar et al. (2009) found trigger points in the upper trapezius to appear as discrete hypoechoic nodules on ultrasound.
  • claiminVASO-C171Sikdar et al. (2009) found trigger points in the upper trapezius to be stiffer than the surrounding tissue.
  • claiminVASO-C172Sikdar et al. (2009) found abnormal flow around trigger points in the upper trapezius.
  • claiminVASO-C173The second family of reported phenomena does not respond to rolling at all. (True if practitioner event logs show no change in these phenomena time-locked to r…
  • claiminVASO-C143The site-selective rise in trigger-point activity under a cognitive stressor is a regional sympathetic vasoconstriction written to a skin territory, as in blus…
  • claiminVASO-C174What holds a knot, on the perforator picture, is a composite of three memory elements rather than one: the vessel's tone, the hyaluronan collar, and the sheet'…
  • claiminVASO-C175Each of the three elements has hysteresis — each stays where it was put after the input that put it there has gone.
  • evidenceinVASO-E044Second essay relocates the vascular element from intramuscular arterioles to cutaneous perforators
  • evidenceinVASO-E045Second essay accepts the arteriole audit: sustained activation, not economical latch
  • evidenceinVASO-E047Essay restates Hong & Simons 1993: inactivating a key trigger point inactivated its satellites
  • evidenceinVASO-E050Essay restates Sikdar 2009: hypoechoic, stiffer nodules with abnormal flow at trapezius trigger points
  • evidenceinVASO-E051Essay restates an attenuated skin blood-flow response over latent trigger points
  • evidenceinVASO-E052Essay restates equine needle-EMG: same spontaneous activity as human trigger points
  • researchinVASO-R015Map the staples: blinded coincidence of palpated tender points with pencil-Doppler perforators against chance
  • researchinVASO-R016Film a star: laser speckle over a superficial knot with exhale, inhale-hold, sham-site and CO2 controls
  • researchinVASO-R017Free a collar without breath: ultrasound-guided saline hydrodissection at a mapped perforator under a tender point
  • researchinVASO-R018The knot-free endpoint as a natural experiment, with a sensory exam to exclude a damaged finder
  • researchinVASO-R019Open the primaries behind the second essay's audit (Heine 1988; Langevin & Yandow 2002; Dorsher 2009; Segal & Duling 1986; Hong & Simons 1993; Taylor & Palmer…
2026-09-09verifyper-month cap: $149.60 spent + $0.42 estimated > $150.00 (config/budget.yaml); nothing was sentfailed$12.29

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-054625

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09verifyadmitted 28 claims, 10 evidence, 2 research; 12 refused40 in · 12 failed$3.55

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-042925

refused, with the reason

  • evidencefailedEssay asserts critics do not dispute that palpable tender spots exist

    second reader rejected (independenceNoted): The quote appears verbatim at p.2 and accurately reflects the essay's claim that critics do not dispute the existence of tender, localizable spots, only their mechanism, matching the record's use. The locator matches, and the record itself notes this is uncited/secondary AI-…

  • claimfailedPalpable knot burden increases with age and correlates with declining flexibility, particularly around the hips. (True if a standardized count of tender points…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quote itself appears verbatim on p.3, but the record's statement frames it as if a standardized, measured tender-point count study exists, whereas the source explicitly states elsewhere (p.13) that no such census or dataset has ever been collected and this is…

  • claimfailedFascia is among the most richly innervated tissues in the body, dense with endings reporting pressure and stretch. (True if quantitative histology shows nerve-…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quoted phrase does appear on p.4 and is used in context as the essay's own assertion, not misattributed. However the record's proposition demands quantitative histological evidence showing nerve-ending density comparable to or exceeding other tissues, while t…

  • claimfailedAge-related arterial stiffening measured by pulse wave velocity reflects accumulated vasomotor latch burden rather than only structural wall change. (True if a…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quote does appear on p.14, but it is explicitly framed by the author as a speculative reframing ('the vasocomputation reading says...'), not as a claim about acute reversibility of PWV with vasodilation or unlatching interventions. The anchored proposition ad…

  • claimfailedLatent trigger points differ from active trigger points on local blood-flow velocities. (True if Doppler velocity measures separate active from latent sites at…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quoted passage at p.17 does appear and does state that latent points separate from active ones on flow velocities, but the source is a speculative essay summarizing literature loosely, without any mention of a blinded design or group-level statistical analysi…

  • claimfailedA latched knot is metabolically cold on FDG-PET while stiff on elastography and electrically active on EMG. (True if FDG uptake at palpated knots is at or belo…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The source explicitly frames the PET/EMG/elastography triple signature as an untested prediction of the latch hypothesis ('PET is the dark horse, with a distinctive prediction'), not as an established or verified property of knots. The record's statement presents…

  • claimfailedTibetan tantric physiology, Hindu yoga and classical Chinese medicine independently arrived at three claims: bodily knots exist, breath is the tool for untying…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported): The quoted passage does occur on p.18 and is used in context to assert independent convergence, but the record specifically claims that classical Chinese medicine (ashi points) satisfies all three claims including 'untying changes consciousness'; the source's own…

  • claimfailedReleasing held somatic material faster than the system can integrate produces destabilization — tears, trembling, disorientation, surfacing affect. (True if in…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported, relevant): The source at p.22 does support that overly fast release of held material can be destabilizing (tears, trembling, disorientation, surfacing affect), but it never frames this in terms of rates compared to matched controls—that operationalization is inven…

  • claimfailedClinical research has documented serious meditation-related adverse effects including autonomic storms, months-long periods of debilitating pain and fear, and…

    second reader rejected the anchor (statementSupported, relevant): The quoted text at p.23 accurately reflects the essay's mention of Britton's research on meditation adverse effects, but the anchor source itself is an AI-generated Substack essay, not a peer-reviewed study—it merely references Britton's program secondh…

  • claimfailedChronic psychological stress slows wound healing: stressed caregivers' wounds heal roughly a quarter slower than controls. (True if a controlled wound-healing…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quote about stressed caregivers' wounds healing roughly a quarter slower is accurately located at p.27 and fairly represents the source's claim, used there as evidence for a separate 'mundane mechanism' argument about stress and healing rates, not about muscle knots or…

  • claimfailedDuring a purely cognitive stressor such as serial subtraction, a knot measurably stiffens and its local perfusion drops. (True if co-registered elastography an…

    second reader rejected the anchor (quoteInContext, statementSupported): The quoted phrase is explicitly framed in the source as a predicted outcome of a not-yet-run proposed experiment (the Tier 1 keystone study), not as an observed or measured finding; the sentence begins 'The prediction is that...'. The record's sta…

  • claimfailedRandomized trials of foam rolling reliably show short-term gains in range of motion. (True if systematic reviews of foam-rolling RCTs report consistent acute R…

    second reader rejected the anchor (relevant): The quoted line is a genuine aside on p.32 where the author dismisses further foam-rolling RCTs as unnecessary because they already reliably show short-term ROM gains, so the quote is accurately used and located. However, this observation about ROM outcomes from foam-rolli…

admitted

  • claiminVASO-C038Recently formed knots release within a single session of pressure-and-breath work, while long-standing knots require months of repeated work. (True if time-to-…
  • claiminVASO-C039Sustained pressure alone, without breath manipulation, does not release a knot. (True if pressure-only trials produce no felt or measured release where pressur…
  • claiminVASO-C040The obstruction felt at a knot is a dull blockage or refusal to move, qualitatively distinct from the sharp end-range pain of a stretched muscle. (True if blin…
  • claiminVASO-C041The dull, diffuse ache of a knot is carried by unmyelinated interoceptive afferents rather than by the fast myelinated fibers that carry stretch pain. (True if…
  • claiminVASO-C042Fascial densification — increased viscosity of the hyaluronan between fascial layers — is reversible by pressure, movement and warmth, and increases with age.…
  • claiminVASO-C043In chronic pain the somatosensory cortical representation of the affected body region is degraded or blurred. (True if cortical mapping in chronic-pain patient…
  • claiminVASO-C045The fascia of the diaphragm is anatomically continuous with the psoas at T12–L1. (True if dissection or imaging shows continuous fascial connection at that lev…
  • claiminVASO-C046Relaxation training lowers spontaneous needle-EMG activity at trigger points. (True if EMG amplitude at the nidus falls during or after a relaxation procedure…
  • claiminVASO-C047Local infusion of phentolamine, an alpha-adrenergic blocker, substantially reduces spontaneous electrical activity at a trigger point. (True if a controlled re…
  • claiminVASO-C048Smooth muscle in the latch state is histologically normal — latched tissue looks normal under a microscope. (True if microscopy of latched versus relaxed vascu…
  • claiminVASO-C049Sympathetic stress chemistry promotes latch-bridge formation, and the nitric-oxide relaxation pathway promotes unlatching. (True if adrenergic agonists increas…
  • claiminVASO-C050Vascular smooth muscle exhibits hysteresis: two vessels under identical present inputs can be in different contractile states depending on their history over t…
  • claiminVASO-C051Dorsal root ganglia lie behind a permeable blood barrier and are directly exposed to vascular chemistry, unlike the brain. (True if tracer studies show substan…
  • claiminVASO-C052Peripheral sensory nerve endings are in many cases anatomically wrapped around the vessels whose diameter changes they would sense. (True if histology shows me…
  • claiminVASO-C053No published study reports palpable knot burden as a function of age or its distribution across the body. (True if a systematic search finds no such natural-hi…
  • claiminVASO-C055Shear-wave elastography and sensitive small-vessel Doppler can be acquired through the same ultrasound probe at knot depths at frame rates sufficient to observ…
  • claiminVASO-C057Conventional structural MRI largely fails to image trigger points: they are invisible on T1-weighted imaging, with only preliminary promise on T2 mapping. (Tru…
  • claiminVASO-C059In community samples examined with the 18-site fibromyalgia tender-point protocol, tender points are nearly universal, with median counts of about 6 in women a…
  • claiminVASO-C060Tender-point counts in community samples track psychological distress and poor sleep rather than tissue damage. (True if counts correlate with distress and sle…
  • claiminVASO-C061Bulk resting muscle stiffness on elastography can fall with age as muscle quality declines while focal stiff spots accumulate. (True if aging elastography data…
  • claiminVASO-C063The traditional contemplative maps place the important knots along the torso's midline and the limbs rather than in the head. (True if a blinded coding of rtsa…
  • claiminVASO-C064Release of an old, heavily loaded knot cluster can produce a wave of euphoria with warmth radiating from the site and minutes of immobility. (True if such even…
  • claiminVASO-C065Large releases cascade: one cluster letting go is followed by release of neighbouring holdings across a region. (True if a second probe at an adjacent or contr…
  • claiminVASO-C066The magnitude of euphoria at a release tracks the amplitude of the concurrent stiffness drop and perfusion rise. (True if rated release intensity correlates wi…
  • claiminVASO-C067Contemplative traditions describe the untying of bodily knots (rtsa mdud, granthis) as accompanied by bliss and, in deep states, bodily immobility. (True if pr…
  • claiminVASO-C071No controlled study has shown cognition or a mental state regenerating an anatomical structure. (True if a systematic search finds none; false if one exists.)
  • claiminVASO-C073In a breath-assisted release, local reperfusion precedes the mechanical stiffness change — blood first, stiffness second. (True if time-resolved Doppler and el…
  • claiminVASO-C074Drugs that modulate the nitric-oxide pathway or sympathetic tone change how easily knots release. (True if a controlled pharmacological challenge alters releas…
  • evidenceinVASO-E033Essay restates the stress-up / relaxation-down EMG pattern at trigger points
  • evidenceinVASO-E034Essay's description of the latch: force persists after activation disappears
  • evidenceinVASO-E035The speed-of-release argument as the essay states it
  • evidenceinVASO-E036Essay asserts exhalation shifts autonomic balance parasympathetic
  • evidenceinVASO-E037Essay's statement of the knot-as-latched-arteriole hypothesis
  • evidenceinVASO-E038Essay's statement of the clinging-as-latch identification
  • evidenceinVASO-E039Essay: traditional maps cluster knots along the torso midline and limbs
  • evidenceinVASO-E041Essay's caveat: Mizrachi's route is vagal and skin is not parasympathetically innervated
  • evidenceinVASO-E042Essay: Doppler as the most consistent positive imaging result
  • evidenceinVASO-E043Essay restates Hubbard–Berkoff: signal vanishes a centimeter away
  • researchinVASO-R013FDG-PET overlaid on elastography at palpated knots: is the stiff, electrically active spot metabolically cold?
  • researchinVASO-R014Retrieve the primaries behind the newly catalogued affective and adverse-effect claims (Britton; Leknes & Tracey; Moseley/Flor)
2026-09-09verifyadmitted 6 claims, 11 evidence, 2 sources, 2 research; 0 refused; 1 correction(s) applied21 in$0.79

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-041231

admitted

  • sourceinSRC-BALLYNS-2011Objective Sonographic Measures for Characterizing Myofascial Trigger Points Associated With Cervical Pain
  • sourceinSRC-SIMONS-2002Endplate Potentials Are Common to Midfiber Myofacial Trigger Points
  • claiminVASO-C031In patients with acute cervical pain, pulsatile arteries within 1–2 cm of active upper-trapezius trigger points show a higher Doppler pulsatility index than ar…
  • claiminVASO-C032Retrograde diastolic flow occurs in arteries near roughly a third (31%) of palpably normal upper-trapezius sites in patients who have trigger points elsewhere…
  • claiminVASO-C033The area of reduced vibration amplitude on sonoelastography is larger at active trigger-point sites than at latent sites, and larger at latent sites than at pa…
  • claiminVASO-C034Endplate noise on needle EMG occurs at some endplate-zone sites that are outside any trigger point, at lower prevalence than at trigger-point sites.
  • claiminVASO-C035Endplate noise on needle EMG does not occur at taut-band sites that lie outside the motor endplate zone.
  • claiminVASO-C036The Doppler resistivity index of arteries near upper-trapezius sites does not differ between active trigger-point, latent trigger-point and palpably normal sit…
  • evidenceinVASO-E022Ballyns 2011: arteries near active trigger points show higher pulsatility and more frequent retrograde diastolic flow — but 31% of palpably normal sites show i…
  • evidenceinVASO-E023Ballyns 2011: vibration sonoelastography stiff-area measurements separate active, latent and normal sites
  • evidenceinVASO-E024Ballyns 2011: resistivity index did not differ between active, latent and normal sites
  • evidenceinVASO-E025Ballyns 2011: the Doppler indices do not cleanly separate sites
  • evidenceinVASO-E026Ballyns 2011: no pain-free control group; 'normal' sites sit in symptomatic muscle
  • evidenceinVASO-E027Ballyns 2011: high-resistance flow near trigger points is compatible with compression by contracture, inflammation, or transducer pressure as much as with dist…
  • evidenceinVASO-E028Ballyns 2011 introduction: 'muscle knots' as a common condition with a cited prevalence estimate
  • evidenceinVASO-E029Ballyns 2011: palpation is the reference standard and remains subjective
  • evidenceinVASO-E030Ballyns 2011 pilot: trigger-point area and pulsatility index fell over follow-up visits after dry needling in three active cases
  • evidenceinVASO-E031Simons, Hong & Simons 2002: endplate noise is characteristic of, but not restricted to, trigger points
  • evidenceinVASO-E032Simons, Hong & Simons 2002: prevalence of endplate noise at trigger-point, endplate-zone and off-zone taut-band sites
  • researchinVASO-R011Needle EMG at a trigger point versus a matched endplate-zone control site under mental arithmetic
  • researchinVASO-R012Open the located-but-unretrieved primaries behind this pass (Banks 1998, Hubbard 1996, Chen 1998, Olewnik 2025, Zhang 2009, Ge 2011)
2026-09-09verifyadmitted nothing; 0 refused$0.00

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-040612

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09verifyadmitted 1 research; 5 refused1 in · 5 blocked$0.00

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-040201

refused, with the reason

  • evidenceblockedHubbard–Berkoff abstract: spontaneous EMG amplitude higher in tension-headache and fibromyalgia patients than in normals

    source text not retrievable: no URL on the record and no open-access copy known to OpenAlex

  • evidenceblockedHubbard–Berkoff abstract: the authors attribute trigger points to sympathetically activated intrafusal contractions

    source text not retrievable: no URL on the record and no open-access copy known to OpenAlex

  • evidenceblockedThe primary observers' generator is autonomic but skeletal (intrafusal), not vascular

    source text not retrievable: no URL on the record and no open-access copy known to OpenAlex

  • claimblockedSpontaneous needle-EMG amplitude at trapezius trigger points is higher in tension-headache and fibromyalgia patients than in healthy subjects.

    anchor source not retrievable (no URL on the record and no open-access copy known to OpenAlex) and no accepted evidence cites the claim

  • claimblockedThe spontaneous electrical activity recorded at trigger points is generated by sympathetically activated contraction of intrafusal (muscle-spindle) fibers.

    anchor source not retrievable (no URL on the record and no open-access copy known to OpenAlex) and no accepted evidence cites the claim

admitted

  • researchinVASO-R010Retrieve the fibromyalgia-era community tender-point-count surveys as a proto-census
2026-09-09verifyadmitted 2 research; 0 refused2 in$0.00

run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-022224

admitted

  • researchinVASO-R008Densification versus latch: does fascial hyaluronan densification account for a reversible, non-vascular release?
  • researchinVASO-R009Locate the phentolamine trigger-point study: does sympathetic blockade quiet the nidus?
2026-09-09reportresearch pass (claude-fable-5-1)$4.04

run 2026-09-09-report-vasocomputation-023157

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09inbox1 item(s) taken in$0.09

run 2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-053800

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09inbox1 item(s) taken in$0.07

run 2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-031907

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09inbox1 item(s) taken in$0.02

run 2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-021828

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09inbox1 item(s) taken in$0.02

run 2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-021637

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09inbox1 item(s) taken in$0.07

run 2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-021500

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editionre-adopts the incumbent's assessment$4.23

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-144203

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editiona new edition with a new assessment$6.31

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-070721

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editiona new edition with a new assessment$3.69

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-044134

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editiona new edition with a new assessment$3.56

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-041602

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editionthe ledger has not moved since edition-2026-09-09-040401 (hash f290fe77451d) and the panel's judgment is answered; nothing material to re-tell — pass --force to draft anywayrested$0.00

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-040612

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editionre-adopts the incumbent's assessment$1.75

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-040202

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09editiona new edition with a new assessment$2.52

run 2026-09-09-edition-vasocomputation-022224

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)4 duplicate · 33 blocked · 2 irrelevant$4.61

run 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-053853

refused, with the reason

  • sourceduplicateSRC-JHONG-2026Report: 'Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation — no OpenAlex result'; new essay p. 1: 'A companion to “ Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation .”'

    The companion essay 'Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation' the new item names is the ledger's existing verified source SRC-JHONG-2026 (founding input VASO-IN002).

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Ultrasound and vibration sonoelastography of trigger points (Sikdar, 2009) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    Sikdar et al. 2009 (gray-scale ultrasound, vibration sonoelastography and Doppler of upper-trapezius trigger points) was not resolved and no text retrieved; it would anchor VASO-C140 and bear on VASO-C005. Same NIH lineage as SRC-BALLYNS-2011.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Local blood flow response to ischemic compression at trigger point (microdialysis study) (Moraska, 2013) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    Moraska et al. 2013 (microdialysis blood-flow response to ischemic compression at an active trigger point) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C136 and inform VASO-C073/C039.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Dry-needling effect on blood flow and oxygen saturation in trapezius (Cagnie, 2012) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    Cagnie et al. 2012 (dry needling raises trapezius blood flow and oxygen saturation in healthy volunteers) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C137.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MCNULTY-1994Report: 'Mental arithmetic increases electrical activity at trigger point (McNulty, 1994) — no OpenAlex result'.

    McNulty et al. 1994 is already in the ledger (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02220.x), anchoring VASO-E002.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Anatomical features of acupoints (Dung, 1984) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 19.

    Dung 1984 (anatomical features of acupoints: nerves emerging from deep fascia, neurovascular bundles, motor points) not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C123–C130 and VASO-C022.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Dissection study finding acupoints coincide with neurovascular perforators (Heine, 1988) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 19, 31.

    Heine 1988 dissection (≈80% of classical acupoints at superficial-fascia perforations by a vessel–nerve bundle) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C123 and bear on VASO-C022 and VASO-C096.

    reopen if: The primary (possibly German-language) is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Relationship of acupuncture points and meridians to connective tissue planes (Langevin, Yandow, 2002) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 19–20, 31.

    Langevin & Yandow 2002 (80% of acupoints and half of meridians on connective-tissue planes) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C124.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Comparison of trigger point and acupuncture point maps (Melzack) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 20.

    Melzack's comparison of trigger-point and acupoint maps not resolved, no text, no year given; background to VASO-C125.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Trigger point-acupuncture point correspondence study (Dorsher, 2009) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 20, 31.

    Dorsher 2009 (trigger-point manual versus acupoint atlas, >90% correspondence, referred-pain patterns following meridians) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C125.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Densification model of fascial stiffness (Stecco, 2011) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 5, 31.

    Stecco et al. 2011 (hyaluronan within fascia as substrate of myofascial pain) not resolved, no text; bears on VASO-C077, VASO-C101, VASO-C011 and VASO-R008. Previously blocked under text keys.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Ultrasound of loose connective tissue sublayers in chronic neck pain (Stecco, 2014) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 31.

    Stecco et al. 2014 (ultrasound: loose-connective-tissue sublayers of neck fascia thicker in chronic neck pain, thinning with treatment) not resolved, no text; would bear on VASO-C077 and VASO-C005.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Reduced shear glide between thoracolumbar fascia layers in chronic low back pain (Langevin, 2011) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 31.

    Langevin et al. 2011 (≈20% less shear glide between thoracolumbar fascia layers in chronic low back pain) not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C077 and the densification alternative.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Systematic review of fascial thickness, echogenicity, and shear-strain differences in chronic back pain (2026) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 31.

    A 2026 European Spine Journal systematic review of fascial thickness, echogenicity and shear-strain differences in chronic back pain not resolved, no text; background only.

    reopen if: The review is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Systematic review of hydrodissection for nerve entrapment syndromes — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 31.

    Systematic review of hydrodissection for nerve entrapment syndromes not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C128 and VASO-C129.

    reopen if: The review is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: "Case report: Carnett's sign, perforator artery on Doppler, hydrodissection resolution (Yoshinaga, 2025) — no OpenAlex result"; essay p. 31.

    Yoshinaga et al. 2025 case report (Carnett's sign, perforating artery on color Doppler beneath the tender point, resolution by hydrodissection) not resolved, no text; would bear on VASO-C128 and VASO-C129 as a single case.

    reopen if: The case report is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Thermographic pilot study of perforating vessels at acupoints (Álvarez-Prats, 2019) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 31.

    Álvarez-Prats et al. 2019 thermographic pilot (perforating vessels at acupoints) not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C123.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Dissection of five-shu points of the arm, perforating cutaneous vessels (Meng, 2024) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 31–32.

    Meng et al. 2024 dissection of the five-shu points of the arm (perforating cutaneous vessels a key feature of acupoints) not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C123.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Multicentre dissection study of meridians and fascia (Maurer, 2019) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    Maurer et al. 2019 multicentre dissection (meridians track fascia; vessel–nerve bundles at only a few points) not resolved, no text; the essay's own contrary evidence against VASO-C123/VASO-C096 and important for balance.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Conducted vasodilation along arteriole wall (Segal, Duling, 1986) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32 ('Science 1986').

    Segal & Duling 1986 (conducted vasodilation propagating along the arteriole wall independent of flow) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C103 to a primary.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Review of electrical basis of vascular conduction (2025) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    A 2025 Physiological Reviews treatment of the electrical basis of vascular conduction not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C103.

    reopen if: The review is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Inactivation of key trigger point inactivates satellite trigger points (Hong, Simons, 1993) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    Hong & Simons 1993 (inactivating a key trigger point inactivated its satellites) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C132 and bear on VASO-C065.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: "Map of body's major cutaneous perforators (angiosome mapping) (Taylor, Palmer, 1987) — no OpenAlex result"; essay p. 32.

    Taylor & Palmer 1987 (angiosome mapping; average 374 cutaneous perforators ≥0.5 mm) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C131.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Case report: self-induced pneumoparotid with cervicofacial emphysema tracking to mediastinum (2025) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    2025 case report of self-induced pneumoparotid with cervicofacial emphysema tracking to the mediastinum not resolved, no text; would bear on VASO-C117 and VASO-C116.

    reopen if: The case report is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Pediatric cases of pneumoparotid with imaging findings (2025) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    2025 pediatric pneumoparotid cases with ultrasound/CT air in the parotid and deep cervical spaces not resolved, no text; would bear on VASO-C117.

    reopen if: The report is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Review of dental drill air reaching retropharynx and mediastinum — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 9, 12, 32.

    Review of dental-drill air reaching the retropharynx and mediastinum not resolved, no text; would bear on VASO-C116 and VASO-C110.

    reopen if: The review is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Review of myodural bridge complex and CSF circulation role (2026) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    2026 review of the myodural bridge complex and its proposed CSF-circulation role not resolved, no text; background to VASO-C121.

    reopen if: The review is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Study of meditation-related experiences and somatic reports (Lindahl, 2017) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    Lindahl et al. 2017 (varieties of meditation-related experiences; somatic reports) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C133 and bear on VASO-C091. Previously an irrelevant Britton-program entry; now relevant to catalogued claims.

    reopen if: The primary (open access) is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Equine trigger points show spontaneous electrical activity (Macgregor, von Schweinitz, 2006) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 25, 32.

    Macgregor & von Schweinitz 2006 (needle EMG of equine trigger points) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C138.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Review arguing trigger points as primary cause of equine lameness (2026) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 32.

    A 2026 Frontiers in Veterinary Science review arguing trigger points as a primary cause of equine lameness bears on no ledger claim; the cross-species EMG observation is carried by the Macgregor primary.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about trigger points and lameness.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Review of autonomic testing via inspiratory gasp reflex on skin arterioles (2026) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    2026 review of autonomic testing via the inspiratory gasp reflex on skin arterioles not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C097 and VASO-C098.

    reopen if: The review is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Doppler detection of inspiratory reflex on radial artery (2004) — no OpenAlex result'; essay pp. 30–31.

    2004 Journal of Neurology paper on continuous-wave Doppler detection of the inspiratory vasoconstrictor reflex at the radial artery not resolved, no text; would bear on VASO-C097 and the instrument design in VASO-R102.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Innervation of superficial fascia, autonomic fiber content (Fede, 2022) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 31.

    Fede et al. 2022 (innervation of the superficial fascia; about a third autonomic fibers around vessels) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C134.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Attenuated skin blood-flow response over latent trigger points (Arendt-Nielsen) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    The Arendt-Nielsen-group finding of an attenuated skin blood-flow response over latent trigger points is the Zhang et al. 2009 paper already dispositioned as blocked; no text retrieved. Would anchor VASO-C135.

    reopen if: The abstract or full text is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Rabbit model spontaneous electrical activity reduced by phentolamine — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    The rabbit phentolamine result the essay cites 'reviewed here' is Chen et al. 1998, already blocked; no text retrieved. Bears on VASO-C047 and VASO-R009.

    reopen if: The Chen 1998 abstract or full text is retrieved.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-SHAH-2008Report: 'Shah microdialysis study of biochemical milieu at trigger points (Shah) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    Shah's microdialysis work is already in the ledger (doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018), anchoring VASO-E006.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HUBBARD-BERKOFF-1993Report: 'Hubbard and Berkoff needle electromyography finding electrical nidus at trigger points (Hubbard, Berkoff) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 30.

    Hubbard & Berkoff 1993 is already in the ledger (doi:10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015), anchoring VASO-E001.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Description of myodural bridge, connective tissue from rectus capitis posterior minor to dura (1995) — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 17 ('a tether tha…

    The 1995 anatomical description of the myodural bridge (rectus capitis posterior minor to dura) not resolved, no text; would anchor VASO-C121 to a primary.

    reopen if: The primary is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'VASO-R006 project listing — no OpenAlex result'; essay p. 22: 'the project the case already lists as VASO-R006'.

    'VASO-R006 project listing' is the essay's reference to the ledger's own research record, not a published work; nothing to retrieve or anchor.

2026-09-09draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)7 duplicate · 7 blocked · 9 irrelevant · 1 failed$3.16

run 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-042321

refused, with the reason

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HAI-MURPHY-1988Report: 'Formalization of the latch-bridge state in smooth muscle (Hai, Murphy, 1988) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Hai & Murphy 1988 on cross-bridge phosphorylation and the latch state is already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254.1.c99), anchoring VASO-E003. No candidate resolved and no text shown this pass.

    reopen if: An open-access copy is retrieved and yields passages not already recorded in VASO-E003.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-SHAH-2008Report: 'Microdialysis study of biochemical milieu of trigger points (Shah) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 3: 'Jay Shah’s group at NIH sampled th…

    Shah's microdialysis work on the biochemical milieu at active trigger points is already in the ledger (doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018), anchoring VASO-E006; the essay's description (acidic, substance P, CGRP, bradykinin) matches the record.

    reopen if: The founder wants the earlier 2005 J Appl Physiol microdialysis primary as a separate record.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Study distinguishing fascial densification from structural scarring (Stecco) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 3: 'Carla Stec[co] group in…

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. The Stecco group's densification concept now has a catalogued claim to bear on (VASO-C042) as well as VASO-C011/C020 and VASO-R008; nothing can be anchored until a primary paper is retrieved.

    reopen if: A primary Stecco-group paper on hyaluronan densification, its reversibility and its timescale is retrieved with text.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HUBBARD-BERKOFF-1993Report: 'Needle-EMG study of spontaneous electrical activity in trapezius trigger points (Hubbard, Berkoff, 1993) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Hubbard & Berkoff 1993, spontaneous needle-EMG activity at trigger points, already in the ledger (doi:10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015), anchoring VASO-E001.

    reopen if: Full text is retrieved permitting group sizes and amplitude values to be recorded.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MCNULTY-1994Report: 'Study of psychological stressor effects on trigger point electrical activity (McNulty, Gevirtz, 1994) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    McNulty, Gevirtz et al. 1994, trigger-point EMG response to a psychological stressor, already in the ledger (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02220.x), anchoring VASO-E002.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MIZRACHI-2026Report: 'Study on attention direction and inflammatory/vascular response to histamine skin prick (Mizrachi, 2026) — no OpenAlex result'.

    Mizrachi et al. 2026, voluntary attention regulating acute immune responses (histamine skin prick), already in the ledger (doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02541-1), anchoring VASO-E008.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MOORE-CAO-2008Report: 'The hemo-neural hypothesis (Moore, Cao, 2008) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 10: 'neuroscientists Christopher Moore and Rosalind Cao'.

    Moore & Cao 2008, the hemo-neural hypothesis, already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/jn.01366.2006), anchoring VASO-E004. The essay names the second author 'Rosalind Cao' while the article says 'Rosa Cao'; the record's authorship should be checked against the paper when its text is next retrieved.

    reopen if: The paper's text is retrieved and the author name in the ledger record disagrees with it.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Vasocomputation hypothesis writings/tweets (Johnson, Michael Edward, 2024) — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 11 reproduces a screenshot: '@ johnsonmxe ……

    The Dec 2 2024 X thread by @johnsonmxe appears in the essay only as a screenshot; the essay's reproduction is not the post. The written hypothesis is already held as SRC-JOHNSON-2023 (anchoring VASO-E013). The thread would enter only as a proponent's own statement bearing on VASO-C021 at zero diagnostic weight once re…

    reopen if: The X post and thread are retrieved with text and a stable URL.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Work on common neurobiology of pain and pleasure (pain offset/relief) (Leknes, Tracey) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 21: 'Leknes and Tr…

    Leknes & Tracey's review of the common neurobiology of pain and pleasure now bears on the newly catalogued euphoria-of-release claims (VASO-C064, VASO-C066) as the essay's cited basis for reading release as rewarding pain offset. No candidate resolved and no text retrieved, so nothing can be anchored.

    reopen if: The review's text is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Research on sensory cortex map smudging in chronic pain (Moseley) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 4: 'Moseley’s group has shown that in c…

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. Somatosensory cortical reorganization in chronic pain is now a catalogued claim (VASO-C043) and an alternative account of felt release (VASO-C004); nothing can be anchored without a primary Moseley or Flor paper.

    reopen if: A primary Moseley or Flor paper on cortical body-map degradation in chronic pain is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Somatic education concept of sensory-motor amnesia (Hanna, Thomas) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 4 names 'the somatic educator Thomas H…

    Thomas Hanna's 'sensory-motor amnesia' is a conceptual framing from somatic education, not an empirical finding; no ledger claim, including the newly catalogued ones, states or depends on it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about chronic guarding degrading interoceptive access to the held region, for which Hanna's book would be secondary context behind the peer-reviewed literature.

  • sourcefailedReport: 'Classic review of spontaneous regression of cancer (Everson, Cole) → https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90023-7 — candidate by title (similarity 1)…

    The only resolved candidate (similarity 1 by title, OpenAlex title 'Spontaneous regression of cancer'). Retrieval returned only the word 'Redirecting', so title, authors, and content could not be confirmed against the Everson & Cole review the essay names; the DOI's '(96)' suffix suggests a 1996 article, inconsistent…

    reopen if: Crossref metadata or the landing page is retrieved with title and authors, and the founder adds a claim about state-dependent remission for it to bear on.

  • sourceirrelevantEssay p. 26: 'Everson and Cole’s classic review documented spontaneous regression of cancer in the peer-reviewed literature'.

    The work the essay meant — Everson & Cole's review of spontaneous regression of cancer — concerns the essay's 'repair ceiling' argument, which is not a proposition in this ledger (the only related catalogued claim, VASO-C071, is a negative about regeneration that a cancer-regression review does not address).

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission and the review is retrieved with title and authors confirmed.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Bibliography of spontaneous remission case reports — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 26.

    The spontaneous-remission bibliography (attributed by the essay to the Institute of Noetic Sciences) concerns the repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Research on meditation-related adverse effects (Britton, Willoughby) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 23: 'Willoughby Britton’s research p…

    Britton's peer-reviewed research on meditation-related adverse effects now has a catalogued claim to bear on (VASO-C069, and VASO-C068). No candidate resolved and no text retrieved, so nothing can be anchored.

    reopen if: The primary peer-reviewed adverse-effects paper from Britton's program is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Work on spiritual emergency as distinct category from psychosis (Grof, Stan) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 23.

    Grof's 'spiritual emergency' is a conceptual category, not an empirical study; it would be background at most to VASO-C068/C133 and states no testable result the ledger could record.

    reopen if: The founder wants conceptual background recorded for the destabilization claims.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Autobiography documenting kundalini awakening crisis (Krishna, Gopi) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 23.

    Gopi Krishna's autobiography is a single first-person account; as testimony it carries no diagnostic weight on VASO-C068/C133 and is not a study the ledger could anchor.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about kundalini-crisis phenomenology as a first-person data class.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha (Ingram, Daniel) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay pp. 24–25.

    Ingram's book is cited for the essay's harm-reduction and disclosure argument, which is not a claim in the ledger.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about disclosure ethics or 'the only way out is through' as a phenomenological regularity.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Work on regeneration as high-level bioelectric program (Levin lab research) (Levin, Michael) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay pp. 27–28.

    Levin's bioelectric regeneration work is cited for the essay's most speculative rung (repair as a callable program), which the ledger does not carry as a claim; the newly catalogued negative VASO-C071 concerns cognition, not bioelectric manipulation, and Levin's work does not bear on it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about contemplative or autonomic states triggering regenerative programs.

  • sourceblockedReport: '18-site tender-point exam study (fibromyalgia era) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 17: 'tender points nearly universal (medians 6 in wome…

    No specific paper named and no text retrieved. The community 18-site tender-point surveys now have catalogued claims to bear on (VASO-C059, VASO-C060) and would be the only population-level instrumented evidence behind VASO-C001; nothing can be anchored until a primary survey is retrieved.

    reopen if: A primary population-based tender-point-count survey is retrieved with text reporting count distributions by sex and their correlates.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026Report: 'Announcement of full-body ultrasonic CT scanner (2026) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 15: 'In June 2026, Midjourney … announced a full-b…

    The June 2026 full-body ultrasonic tomography announcement is already covered by SRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026 (Butterfly Network's commentary press release), anchoring VASO-E018. The ledger record is third-party commentary; Midjourney Medical's own announcement would be a distinct primary record if retrieved.

    reopen if: Midjourney Medical's own announcement is retrieved with text and URL.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Cheetah House (resource for meditation-related adverse effects) — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 23.

    Cheetah House is a support resource cited as a referral; it makes no empirical statement bearing on any ledger claim.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Concept of Cinderella fibers in motor unit recruitment (Hägg) — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 14: 'Hägg’s “Cinderella fibers” — first recruited, never…

    Hägg's 'Cinderella fiber' hypothesis is offered by the essay as one candidate mechanism for the age-accumulation of knots, now a catalogued claim (VASO-C037). It would enter as context only; no candidate resolved and no text retrieved.

    reopen if: Hägg's primary hypothesis paper is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Radical remission survivor interviews on common recovery factors — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 26.

    Interview studies of 'radical remission' survivors concern the repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim; as retrospective self-report they would carry no diagnostic weight on any mechanism claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

2026-09-09draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)18 blocked · 1 duplicate$2.54

run 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-040754

refused, with the reason

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F2 and §3 item 2; sources[0] url academia.edu retrieved false 'HTTP 403'; sources[7] doi.org/10.1300/j094v06n04_03 retrieved false 'HTTP 403'.

    Banks, Jacobs, Gevirtz & Hubbard 1998 (J Musculoskeletal Pain 6(4), doi:10.1300/J094V06N04_03) was not retrievable: both the academia.edu copy and the DOI returned HTTP 403. The report's OCR'd Table 1 figures (TrP means ~13.4 → 7.6 → 8.7 → 12.9 µV across baseline, relaxation, post-relaxation, stressor) cannot be quote…

    reopen if: The paper's text is retrieved (publisher PDF, library copy, or a clean scan) and the Table 1 values can be read directly.

  • evidenceblockedReport §3 item 2: 'evidence supports VASO-C003 (moderate/weak); link to VASO-E002'.

    Proposed evidence 'autogenic relaxation lowers trigger-point needle EMG, mental arithmetic restores it' (supports VASO-C003) cannot enter without the Banks 1998 text; no quotation is available.

    reopen if: Banks 1998 is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F1 and §3 item 3; sources[8] doi.org/10.1300/j094v04n01_08 retrieved false 'HTTP 403'.

    Hubbard 1996, 'Chronic and recurrent muscle pain: pathophysiology and treatment, and review of pharmacologic studies' (J Musculoskeletal Pain 4(1/2):123–143, doi:10.1300/J094v04n01_08) — the human phentolamine/phenoxybenzamine report VASO-R009 asks for — returned HTTP 403; the report saw its abstract only as a search-…

    reopen if: The abstract page or PDF is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F1 and §3 item 4 ('not opened'); sources[10] doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90357-4 retrieved true, text 'Redirecting'.

    Chen, Chen, Kuan, Chung & Hong 1998, 'Phentolamine effect on the spontaneous electrical activity of active loci in a myofascial trigger spot of rabbit skeletal muscle' (Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:790–794, doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90357-4): the DOI resolved only to the word 'Redirecting'; no title, authors or content co…

    reopen if: The PubMed or ScienceDirect abstract page is retrieved with text confirming title and authors.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F1 and §3 item 5; sources[1] retrieved false 'bot challenge page served with HTTP 200'.

    Rivner 2001, 'The neurophysiology of myofascial pain syndrome' (Curr Pain Headache Rep 5:432–440, doi:10.1007/s11916-001-0054-6): the Springer page served a bot-challenge page with HTTP 200; no text. It is a secondary review the report offers as background confirming the alpha-blockade result and listing generator hyp…

    reopen if: The abstract page is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F3 and §3 item 6; sources[3] retrieved false 'bot challenge page served with HTTP 200'.

    Ge, Fernández-de-las-Peñas & Yue 2011, 'Myofascial trigger points: spontaneous electrical activity and its consequences for pain induction and propagation' (Chin Med 6:13, doi:10.1186/1749-8546-6-13): BMC page served a bot-challenge page; no text. The report reads it as the endplate-ACh-release interpretation and as t…

    reopen if: The open-access full text is retrieved from BMC or PMC.

  • researchblockedReport §3 item 6: 'flag the curare-vs-botulinum conflict as a research note under VASO-R004/R009'.

    The report's proposed research note — the conflict between Hubbard's statement that curare did not block trigger-point activity and Kuan 2002's report that botulinum toxin reduced it, bearing on whether the nidus is cholinergic — rests entirely on unretrieved sources (Banks 1998, Ge 2011, Kuan 2002). It is folded into…

    reopen if: Ge 2011 and Kuan 2002 are retrieved and the two statements can be quoted.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F5 and §3 item 8; sources[5] retrieved false 'bot challenge page served with HTTP 200'.

    Olewnik et al. 2025, 'Ultrasound elastography to guide compression therapy for gastrocnemius trigger points in runners' (Sci Rep 15:41950, doi:10.1038/s41598-025-25902-8): nature.com served a bot-challenge page; no text. The report's figures (103 MTrPs in 30 runners; 75 undetectable by palpation and imaging immediatel…

    reopen if: The open-access full text or PDF is retrieved.

  • evidenceblockedReport §3 item 8: 'evidence supports VASO-C011 (moderate); evidence qualifies VASO-C004 (pressure alone sufficed)'.

    Proposed evidence from Olewnik 2025 — objective minutes-scale, day-persistent disappearance of palpated stiff foci under pressure alone — supporting VASO-C011 and qualifying VASO-C004 cannot enter without the retrieved text.

    reopen if: Olewnik 2025 is retrieved.

  • claimblockedReport §1 F5: '75/103 MTrPs undetectable by palpation and imaging … none of the 96 recurred at 24 h … no breath manipulation'.

    The proposition 'palpated trigger points can become undetectable by palpation and elastography within minutes of pressure alone, without breath instruction, and remain absent at 24 hours' would be anchored only to Olewnik 2025, which was not retrieved.

    reopen if: Olewnik 2025 is retrieved with a quotable passage.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F6 and §3 item 9; sources[12] retrieved true, text 'Redirecting'.

    Zhang, Ge, Yue, Kimura & Arendt-Nielsen 2009, 'Attenuated skin blood flow response to nociceptive stimulation of latent myofascial trigger points' (Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:325–332, doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.037): the DOI resolved only to 'Redirecting'; the report saw the abstract only as a search snippet. Nothing ca…

    reopen if: The abstract page is retrieved with text.

  • evidenceblockedReport §3 item 9.

    Proposed evidence 'attenuated skin blood-flow response to glutamate at latent trigger points, read as sympathetic vasoconstrictor hyperactivity' (supports VASO-C005 weakly; context VASO-C020) cannot enter without the Zhang 2009 text.

    reopen if: Zhang 2009 is retrieved.

  • sourceblockedReport §1 F7 and §3 item 10; sources[6] retrieved false 'bot challenge page served with HTTP 200'.

    'Painful Connections: Densification Versus Fibrosis of Fascia' (Curr Pain Headache Rep 18:8, 2014, doi:10.1007/s11916-014-0441-4): Springer served a bot-challenge page; no text. The report's reading that densification is 'an alteration that is easily reversible' with no timescale given cannot be quoted. The prior `dec…

    reopen if: The abstract page or full text is retrieved; ideally together with Cowman 2015 for the hyaluronan viscosity physics.

  • evidenceblockedReport §1 F8 and §3 item 11: 'LWW abstract page content, via search result; full text not opened'.

    The report's proposed update to VASO-E007's provenance note ('second-hand' → 'abstract observed, full text pending') for SRC-MAZZA-2021 rests on an abstract the report saw only as a search result; no Mazza text was shown to me, so no correction can be written and no URL can be added to the record.

    reopen if: The Mazza 2021 abstract or full text (e.g., PMC8448923 or the eScholarship PDF the report names) is retrieved and shown.

  • sourceblockedsources[2] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11989519/ retrieved true, text 'Cookies must be enabled'.

    PubMed page for Simons 2002 (PMID 11989519) returned only a 'Cookies must be enabled' notice; the same work was retrieved from the Ovid page at its DOI and added as SRC-SIMONS-2002, so this URL is redundant rather than a separate candidate.

    reopen if: Not needed; the DOI page sufficed. Reopen only if the full text is sought and the PubMed route offers a PMC link.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-BALLYNS-2011sources[11] doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.10.1331 retrieved false 'HTTP 403'; sources[4] PMC3493620 retrieved true.

    The publisher DOI https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.10.1331 returned HTTP 403, but the same article's NIH author manuscript (PMC3493620) was retrieved in full and is the record added this pass; the DOI is recorded as its identifier.

  • researchblockedReport §3 'Considered and not proposed': 'only its reference list was visible — worth a future look as a registered imaging protocol'.

    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06060925 'Imaging Biomarkers for Myofascial Pain' was seen by the report only as a reference list in a search snippet; the report itself did not propose it. Noted as a registered imaging protocol worth reading for VASO-R001's design, but nothing was shown.

    reopen if: The registry record is retrieved with its protocol summary and outcome measures.

  • imageblockedReport §4 Plates: 'Fig. 3 … or Fig. 5 … could be candidates if the licence is confirmed CC BY … I inspected neither image file itself, only their captions.'

    Candidate plate from Olewnik 2025 (Fig. 3 compression technique or Fig. 5 elimination outcomes): the paper was not retrieved, the licence is unconfirmed (report says 'if the licence is confirmed CC BY'), and the report inspected only captions, not the image files. No public record URL, licence or credit was shown.

    reopen if: Olewnik 2025 is retrieved with an explicit CC BY licence statement and the figure URL and caption are shown.

  • imageblockedReport §4 Plates: 'Ballyns 2011 Fig. 2 … is an NIH author manuscript and its reuse terms should be checked before use.' Retrieved PMC text: '© 2011 by the Amer…

    Candidate plate from Ballyns 2011 Fig. 2 (Doppler waveform grades): the PMC page shows the caption but the figure file was not shown, and the reuse terms of an NIH author manuscript under a 2011 AIUM copyright are not a licence the ledger can record. The PMC page states '© 2011 by the American Institute of Ultrasound…

    reopen if: Reuse permission from AIUM/J Ultrasound Med is obtained or the figure is confirmed to fall under an open licence, and the figure URL is shown.

2026-09-09draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)9 duplicate · 4 blocked · 17 irrelevant · 4 failed$1.77

run 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-040401

refused, with the reason

  • sourceduplicateSRC-JHONG-2026Report header: 'Supplied by Eugene (own work); PDF, 34 pages … the text states it was generated by Kimi and Fable. Discovery material: propose records only fro…

    The supplied 34-page PDF is the founder's Substack essay 'Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation' (Eugene, Aug 13 2026), already in the ledger as SRC-JHONG-2026 and listed as founding input VASO-IN002. On the report's stated footing it is supplier's words; the item does not carry the 'THIS DOCUMENT IS THE LEDGER'S SOU…

    reopen if: The founder resubmits the item marked as the ledger's source SRC-JHONG-2026, in which case its distinct testable propositions should be catalogued as unfeatured, ungraded claims anchored by [p. N].

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HAI-MURPHY-1988Report: 'Latch state of vascular smooth muscle (formalization) (Hai, Murphy, 1988) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Hai & Murphy 1988 on cross-bridge phosphorylation and the latch state is already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254.1.c99), anchoring VASO-E003. No candidate resolved and no text shown this pass.

    reopen if: An open-access copy is retrieved and yields passages not already recorded in VASO-E003.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HUBBARD-BERKOFF-1993Report: 'Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous electrical activity (needle EMG study) (Hubbard, Berkoff, 1993) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Hubbard & Berkoff 1993, spontaneous needle-EMG activity at trigger points, already in the ledger (doi:10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015), anchoring VASO-E001. No text shown this pass.

    reopen if: Full text is retrieved permitting group sizes and amplitude values to be recorded.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MCNULTY-1994Report: 'Effect of mental stressor on trigger point electrical activity (McNulty, Gevirtz, 1994) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    McNulty, Gevirtz et al. 1994, trigger-point EMG response to a psychological stressor, already in the ledger (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02220.x), anchoring VASO-E002.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-SHAH-2008Report: 'Microdialysis of trigger points (biochemical milieu study) (Shah) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 3: 'Jay Shah's group at NIH sa…

    Shah's microdialysis work on the biochemical milieu at active trigger points is already in the ledger (doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018), anchoring VASO-E006. The essay's description (acidic, substance P, CGRP, bradykinin) matches the ledger record.

    reopen if: The founder wants the earlier 2005 J Appl Physiol microdialysis primary as a separate record.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Fascial densification research (Stecco) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 3: 'Carla Stecco's group in Padua prominent among them —…

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. The Stecco group's fascial densification concept (reversible hyaluronan viscosity between fascial layers, distinct from scarring) is a competing non-vascular state-level account of the dull-blockage phenomenology and possibly of rapid release, bearing on VASO-C011 and VASO-…

    reopen if: A primary Stecco-group paper on hyaluronan densification and its reversibility timescale is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Sensory-motor amnesia concept (Hanna) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 4 names 'the somatic educator Thomas Hanna'.

    Thomas Hanna's 'sensory-motor amnesia' is a conceptual framing from somatic education, not an empirical finding, and no ledger claim states or depends on it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about chronic guarding degrading interoceptive access to the held region.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Cortical smudging of sensory map in chronic pain (Moseley) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 4: 'Moseley's group has shown that in…

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. Somatosensory cortical reorganization in chronic pain is an alternative, non-vascular account of why a felt release follows attention plus pressure, bearing on VASO-C004 and the conventional explanation. Nothing can be anchored without the primary paper.

    reopen if: A primary Moseley or Flor paper on cortical body-map degradation in chronic pain is retrieved with text.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MIZRACHI-2026Report: 'Attention-dependent regulation of inflammatory response (histamine skin prick study) (Mizrachi, 2026) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Mizrachi et al. 2026, voluntary attention regulating acute immune responses (histamine skin prick), already in the ledger (doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02541-1), anchoring VASO-E008.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MOORE-CAO-2008Report: 'Hemo-neural hypothesis (Moore, Cao, 2008) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 10: 'neuroscientists Christopher Moore and Rosalind Ca…

    Moore & Cao 2008, the hemo-neural hypothesis, already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/jn.01366.2006), anchoring VASO-E004. No text shown this pass. The essay gives the second author as 'Rosalind Cao' while the article says 'Rosa Cao'; the record's authorship should be checked against the paper when its text is next retriev…

    reopen if: The paper's text is retrieved and the author name in the ledger record disagrees with it.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-JOHNSON-2023Report: 'Vasocomputation hypothesis (Johnson, Michael Edward) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Johnson's vasocomputation hypothesis is already in the ledger as SRC-JOHNSON-2023 (Principles of Vasocomputation, Part I), anchoring VASO-E013.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Twitter thread on vasocomputation and Buddhist enlightenment (Johnson, Michael Edward, 2024) — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 11 reproduces a screensho…

    The Dec 2 2024 X thread by @johnsonmxe appears in the essay only as a screenshot, and the essay is supplier's words. The thread is a proponent's statement of the vasocomputation/memory hypothesis bearing on VASO-C021 at zero diagnostic weight; it can enter only once the post itself is retrieved with a stable URL.

    reopen if: The X post and thread are retrieved with text and a stable URL.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Cinderella fibers hypothesis (low-threshold motor unit recruitment) (Hägg) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 14: 'Hägg's "Cinderel…

    Hägg's 'Cinderella fiber' hypothesis is invoked by the essay as one of several speculative mechanisms for age-accumulation of knots; the ledger has no claim about age-accumulation mechanism (VASO-C001 states only common occurrence).

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about knot burden rising with age or about low-threshold motor-unit overuse as a mechanism.

  • sourcefailedReport: '18-site tender-point exam (fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria) → https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2018.10.008 — matched by title on OpenAlex (OpenAlex ti…

    Resolved to the wrong work: the candidate's OpenAlex title is 'AAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia', a 2018/2019 diagnostic-criteria paper, whereas the essay meant fibromyalgia-era community-sample surveys that applied the 18-site tender-point exam and reported count distributions (medians 6 in women, 3 in men)…

    reopen if: The candidate's text is retrieved and turns out to report population tender-point-count distributions, which its title does not suggest.

  • sourceblockedEssay p. 17: 'rheumatology's fibromyalgia-era 18-site tender-point exam, applied to community samples, reads like a proto-census — tender points nearly univers…

    The work the essay meant — community-sample surveys using the 18-site tender-point exam that found tender points nearly universal with counts tracking distress and poor sleep — was not resolved and no text was retrieved. If sourced it would be the only population-level, examiner-administered evidence behind VASO-C001…

    reopen if: A primary population-based tender-point-count survey is retrieved with text reporting count distributions by sex and their correlates.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026Report: 'Full-body ultrasonic CT scanner announcement (2026) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 15: 'In June 2026, Midjourney … announced a…

    The June 2026 full-body ultrasonic tomography announcement is already covered by SRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026 (Butterfly Network's commentary press release), anchoring VASO-E018. The ledger record is third-party commentary; Midjourney Medical's own announcement would be a distinct primary record if retrieved.

    reopen if: Midjourney Medical's own announcement is retrieved with text and URL, in which case it enters as a separate primary source rather than a duplicate.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Discovery of active brown fat via PET scans in oncology patients — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 17: 'routine PET is how active…

    The discovery of active brown fat in adults via PET is offered by the essay as an analogy for incidental metabolic-imaging findings; no ledger claim concerns it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about a metabolic-imaging signature at tender points.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Common neurobiology of pain and pleasure / pain offset relief (Leknes, Tracey) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 21.

    Leknes & Tracey on the common neurobiology of pain and pleasure is cited for the essay's 'euphoria of release' section; no ledger claim concerns the affective phenomenology of release.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim that release events produce a rateable euphoria tracking stiffness or perfusion change.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Research on serious meditation-related adverse effects (Britton, Willoughby) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 23.

    Britton's research on meditation-related adverse effects underlies the article's cascade-warning remark, made deliberately without a claim; no ledger claim concerns adverse effects or rapid-release destabilization.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about meditation-related adverse effects or rapid-release destabilization; then retrieve the primary peer-reviewed paper rather than a program description.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Spiritual emergency concept (Grof, Stan) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 23.

    Grof's 'spiritual emergency' concept is cited for the cascade-warning section; no ledger claim concerns it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about crisis states following rapid release.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Autobiography on kundalini awakening crisis (Krishna, Gopi) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 23.

    Gopi Krishna's autobiography is a single first-person account cited for the cascade-warning section; no ledger claim concerns it, and as testimony it would carry no diagnostic weight on any mechanism claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about kundalini-crisis phenomenology as a first-person data class.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha (Ingram, Daniel) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay pp. 24–25.

    Ingram's book is cited for the essay's harm-reduction and disclosure argument, which the article records without a claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about adverse effects of rapid release or about disclosure ethics.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Bibliography of spontaneous remission case reports — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 26.

    The spontaneous-remission bibliography (attributed by the essay to the Institute of Noetic Sciences) concerns the essay's 'repair ceiling' argument, which is not a proposition in this ledger.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

  • sourcefailedReport: 'Spontaneous regression of cancer (review) (Everson, Cole) → https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869009090048 — matched by title on OpenAlex (OpenAlex title:…

    Resolved to an unconfirmed and probably wrong work: the candidate's OpenAlex title, 'The Spontaneous Regression of Cancer: A review of cases from 1900 to 1987', spans cases to 1987, which is inconsistent with Everson & Cole's classic mid-1960s review the essay names, so it is likely a later review by other authors. Re…

    reopen if: Crossref metadata or the landing page is retrieved confirming title and authors, and the founder adds a claim about state-dependent remission for it to bear on.

  • sourceirrelevantEssay p. 26: 'Everson and Cole's classic review documented spontaneous regression of cancer in the peer-reviewed literature'.

    Everson & Cole's review of spontaneous regression of cancer, the work the essay meant, concerns the repair-ceiling argument, which is not a proposition in this ledger. A prior pass also found a different DOI candidate for it unretrievable and unconfirmed.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission and the review is retrieved with title and authors confirmed.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Radical remission survivor interviews / common factors study — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 26.

    Interview studies of 'radical remission' survivors concern the repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim; as retrospective self-report they would carry no diagnostic weight on any mechanism claim in any case.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Bioelectric regeneration / morphology target research (Levin, Michael) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay pp. 27–28.

    Levin's bioelectric regeneration work is cited for the essay's most speculative rung (repair as a callable program), which the ledger does not carry as a claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about contemplative or autonomic states triggering regenerative programs.

  • sourcefailedReport: 'Sham knee surgery trial → https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0708333 — matched by title on OpenAlex (OpenAlex title: "A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Su…

    Resolved to an unconfirmed and probably wrong work: the candidate's OpenAlex title, 'A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee', does not describe a sham (placebo) surgery design, which is what the essay's 'sham knee surgery performed as well as real knee surgery' requires. Retrieval re…

    reopen if: The paper's text is retrieved and shows a sham-controlled arm, and the founder adds a claim about placebo-triggered endogenous repair.

  • sourceirrelevantEssay pp. 26–27: 'in the trial that dared to check, sham knee surgery performed as well as real knee surgery'.

    The sham knee-surgery trial the essay meant is cited for its placebo/repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about placebo-triggered endogenous repair.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Wound healing slowed by caregiver stress study — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 27.

    The stressed-caregivers wound-healing study is cited for the essay's repair-ceiling argument; no ledger claim concerns stress and wound healing.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about sympathetic state degrading tissue repair.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Wound healing slowed by marital hostility study — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 27.

    The marital-hostility wound-healing study is cited for the essay's repair-ceiling argument; no ledger claim concerns stress and wound healing.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about sympathetic state degrading tissue repair.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Cheetah House (resource for meditation-related adverse effects) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 23.

    Cheetah House is a support resource for meditation-related adverse effects, cited by the essay as a referral; it makes no empirical statement bearing on any ledger claim.

  • sourcefailedReport: 'Discovery of Piezo ion channels (2021) → https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.07.001 — matched by title on OpenAlex (OpenAlex title: "PIEZO channels…

    Resolved to the wrong work: the candidate's OpenAlex title, 'PIEZO channels and newcomers in the mammalian mechanosensitive ion channel family', is a 2022 review, not the Piezo discovery paper or the 2021 Nobel Prize the essay refers to. The retrieved text was only the word 'Redirecting', so nothing could be confirmed…

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim specifically about Piezo-channel expression in peripheral sensory endings adjacent to vessels, for which the primary Piezo papers should be retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantEssay p. 10: 'the Piezo channels, whose discovery earned the 2021 Nobel Prize'.

    The Piezo channel discovery and its 2021 Nobel Prize, the work the essay meant, are background to mechanosensation; a prize announcement is not a source for a claim, and VASO-C012's mechanosensation evidence already rests on VASO-E005.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about Piezo-channel expression in peripheral sensory endings adjacent to vessels.

2026-09-09draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)8 duplicate · 4 blocked · 16 irrelevant$1.78

run 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-035914

refused, with the reason

  • sourceduplicateSRC-JHONG-2026Report header: 'Supplied by Eugene (own work); PDF, 34 pages … the text states it was generated by Kimi and Fable. Discovery material: propose records only fro…

    The supplied 34-page PDF is the founder's Substack essay already in the ledger as SRC-JHONG-2026 and listed as founding input VASO-IN002. On the report's stated footing it is supplier's words, not a source; its propositions were not catalogued as claims this pass because the item does not carry the 'THIS DOCUMENT IS T…

    reopen if: The founder resubmits the item marked as the ledger's source SRC-JHONG-2026, in which case its distinct testable propositions should be catalogued as unfeatured, ungraded claims anchored by page.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HAI-MURPHY-1988Report: 'Cross-bridge phosphorylation and regulation of latch state in smooth muscle (Hai, C.M., Murphy, R.A., 1988) → https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254…

    Resolved by title to doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254.1.c99, which is exactly the key the ledger already holds for SRC-HAI-MURPHY-1988 (anchoring VASO-E003). Retrieval returned HTTP 403, so no new text and nothing to add.

    reopen if: An open-access copy is retrieved and yields passages not already in VASO-E003 (e.g., the quantitative energetics figures).

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HUBBARD-BERKOFF-1993Report: '… → https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015 — matched by title on OpenAlex'. sources[1]: retrieved true; abstract text shown.

    Resolved to doi:10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015, the key the ledger already holds. The retrieved abstract page confirms title ('Myofascial Trigger Points Show Spontaneous Needle EMG Activity'), authors (Hubbard, Berkoff), venue (Spine 18(13):1803–1807, Oct 1993) and content, so the candidate is the right work. No new…

    reopen if: Full text is retrieved, permitting group sizes and amplitude values to be recorded.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MOORE-CAO-2008Report: 'Hemo-neural hypothesis paper (2008) (Moore, Christopher, Cao, Rosalind, 2008) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The hemo-neural hypothesis paper is already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/jn.01366.2006), anchoring VASO-E004. No text was shown this pass. The essay names the second author 'Rosalind Cao'; the article says 'Rosa Cao'; the record's authorship should be checked against the paper when its text is next retrieved.

    reopen if: The paper's text is retrieved and the author name in the ledger record disagrees with it.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MCNULTY-1994Report: 'Psychological stressors and trigger point EMG activity (mental arithmetic study) (McNulty, William, Gevirtz, Richard, 1994) — no OpenAlex result close…

    McNulty, Gevirtz et al. 1994 on trigger-point EMG response to a psychological stressor is already in the ledger (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02220.x), anchoring VASO-E002.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MIZRACHI-2026Report: 'Study on voluntary attention regulating peripheral inflammatory/vascular response (histamine skin prick study) (Mizrachi, 2026) — no OpenAlex result c…

    Mizrachi et al. 2026 on voluntary attention regulating acute immune responses is already in the ledger (doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02541-1), anchoring VASO-E008.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-SHAH-2008Report: 'Microdialysis study of trigger point biochemistry (Shah, Jay) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Shah's microdialysis work on the biochemical milieu at active trigger points is already in the ledger (doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018), anchoring VASO-E006.

    reopen if: The founder wants the earlier 2005 J Appl Physiol microdialysis primary as a separate record.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Fascia densification research (Padua group) (Stecco, Carla) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 3 attributes the concept to 'Carla S…

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. The Stecco group's fascial densification concept is a competing non-vascular state-level account of rapid release, bearing on VASO-C011 and VASO-C020 and already the subject of VASO-R008. Nothing can be anchored until a primary paper is retrieved.

    reopen if: A primary Stecco-group paper on hyaluronan densification and its reversibility timescale is retrieved with text.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Sensory cortex smudging in chronic pain (Moseley, G. Lorimer) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. Somatosensory cortical reorganization in chronic pain is an alternative, non-vascular account of why felt release follows attention plus pressure, bearing on VASO-C004 and the conventional explanation.

    reopen if: A primary Moseley or Flor paper on cortical body-map degradation in chronic pain is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Sensory-motor amnesia concept (Hanna, Thomas) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Hanna's 'sensory-motor amnesia' is a conceptual framing from somatic education, not an empirical finding; no ledger claim states or depends on it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about chronic guarding degrading interoceptive access to the held region.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Cinderella fibers hypothesis (low-threshold motor unit recruitment) (Hägg, G.) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The 'Cinderella fiber' hypothesis is invoked by the essay for age-accumulation of knots; the ledger has no claim about age-accumulation mechanism.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about knot burden rising with age or low-threshold motor-unit overuse as a mechanism.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Common neurobiology of pain and pleasure (relief research) (Leknes, Siri, Tracey, Irene) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Leknes & Tracey on the neurobiology of pain and pleasure is cited for the essay's 'euphoria of release' section; no ledger claim concerns the affective phenomenology of release.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim that release events produce a rateable euphoria tracking stiffness or perfusion change.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Spontaneous regression of cancer (classic review) (Everson, Cole) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    A review of spontaneous regression of cancer concerns the essay's 'repair ceiling' argument, which is not a proposition in this ledger. A prior pass also found the DOI candidate unretrievable and unconfirmed.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission and the review is retrieved with title and authors confirmed.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Bibliography of spontaneous remission case reports — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The spontaneous-remission bibliography bears on the repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Radical remission survivor interviews / common factors research — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Interview studies of 'radical remission' survivors concern the repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim; as retrospective self-report they would carry no diagnostic weight on any mechanism claim in any case.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Research on bioelectric control of regeneration and morphology (Levin lab work) (Levin, Michael) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Levin's bioelectric regeneration work is cited for the essay's most speculative rung (repair as a callable program), which the ledger does not carry as a claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about contemplative or autonomic states triggering regenerative programs.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Research on meditation-related adverse effects (Cheetah House / Brown study) (Britton, Willoughby) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Britton's research on meditation-related adverse effects underlies the article's cascade-warning remark, made without a claim; no ledger claim concerns adverse effects.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about meditation-related adverse effects or rapid-release destabilization; then retrieve the primary 'varieties of contemplative experience' paper.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Spiritual emergency concept (Grof, Stan) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Grof's 'spiritual emergency' concept is cited for the cascade-warning section; no ledger claim concerns it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about crisis states following rapid release.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Autobiography on kundalini awakening crisis (Krishna, Gopi) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Gopi Krishna's autobiography is a single first-person account cited for the cascade-warning section; no ledger claim concerns it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about kundalini-crisis phenomenology as a first-person data class.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha (Ingram, Daniel) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    Ingram's book is cited for the harm-reduction argument, which the article records without a claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about adverse effects of rapid release or disclosure ethics.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Vasocomputation proposal (Twitter thread) (Johnson, Michael Edward, 2024) — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 11 reproduces a screenshot dated '6:45 AM ·…

    The Dec 2 2024 X thread by @johnsonmxe appears in the essay only as a screenshot; the essay is supplier's words. The thread is a proponent's statement of the vasocomputation/memory hypothesis bearing on VASO-C021 at zero diagnostic weight, and can enter only once the post itself is retrieved.

    reopen if: The X post and thread are retrieved with text and a stable URL.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026Report: 'Full-body ultrasonic CT scanner announcement (2026) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The June 2026 full-body ultrasonic tomography announcement is already covered by SRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026 (Butterfly Network's commentary), anchoring VASO-E018. The ledger record is third-party commentary; Midjourney Medical's own announcement would be a distinct primary record if retrieved.

    reopen if: Midjourney Medical's own announcement is retrieved with text and URL, in which case it enters as a separate primary source.

  • sourceblockedReport: '18-site tender point exam studies (fibromyalgia era) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'. Essay p. 17: 'tender points nearly universal (median…

    No specific paper named and no text retrieved. The essay's statement that community samples examined with the 18-site fibromyalgia tender-point exam show tender points nearly universal (medians 6 in women, 3 in men) with counts tracking distress would, if sourced, be the only population-level instrumented evidence beh…

    reopen if: A primary population-based tender-point-count survey is retrieved with text reporting count distributions by sex and correlates.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Discovery of active brown fat in adults via PET scans — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The discovery of active brown fat in adults via PET is offered by the essay as an analogy for incidental metabolic imaging findings; no ledger claim concerns it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about a metabolic-imaging signature at tender points.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Piezo ion channel discovery (Nobel Prize 2021) (2021) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The Piezo channel discovery and its 2021 Nobel Prize are background to mechanosensation; the ledger's mechanosensitive-channel evidence for VASO-C012 already rests on the primary 2024 Science demonstration (VASO-E005). A prize announcement is not a source for a claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim specifically about Piezo-channel expression in peripheral sensory endings adjacent to vessels, for which the primary Piezo papers would be retrieved.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Sham knee surgery trial (placebo surgery study) — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The sham knee-surgery trial is cited for the essay's placebo/repair-ceiling argument, which is not a ledger claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about placebo-triggered endogenous repair.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Wound healing and marital hostility study — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The marital-hostility wound-healing study is cited for the essay's repair-ceiling argument; no ledger claim concerns stress and wound healing.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about sympathetic state degrading tissue repair.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Stressed caregivers' wound healing study — no OpenAlex result close enough in title'.

    The stressed-caregivers wound-healing study is cited for the essay's repair-ceiling argument; no ledger claim concerns stress and wound healing.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about sympathetic state degrading tissue repair.

2026-09-09draftschema sent as instructions (too large for strict output)9 duplicate · 4 blocked · 10 irrelevant$1.26

run 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-021940

refused, with the reason

  • sourceduplicateSRC-JHONG-2026Report header: 'document: vasocomputation/knots-of-existence-and-vasocomputation.pdf … Supplied by Eugene (own work); PDF, 34 pages'. Index holds SRC-JHONG-202…

    The supplied PDF is the founder's Substack essay 'Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation' (Eugene, Aug 13 2026), already in the ledger as SRC-JHONG-2026 (verified) and listed as founding input VASO-IN002. As supplier's words it is discovery material, not a citable source; its named works are handled individually below.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Classic review of spontaneous regression of cancer (Everson, Cole) → https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90023-7 — candidate by title (similarity 1)…

    The only resolved candidate. Retrieval yielded no title, authors, or body — the full DOI URL returned only the word 'Redirecting' and the truncated URL returned HTTP 404 — so the candidate cannot be confirmed as the Everson & Cole review the essay names (the DOI's '(96)' suffix pattern points to a 1996 journal article…

    reopen if: The DOI's landing page or Crossref metadata is retrieved with title and authors and the work is confirmed; and the founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission to the ledger for it…

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HAI-MURPHY-1988Report: 'Formalization of the latch-bridge state in smooth muscle (Hai, Murphy, 1988) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index contains SRC-HAI-MURPHY-1988.

    Hai & Murphy 1988 on cross-bridge phosphorylation and the latch state is already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254.1.c99), verified, anchoring VASO-E003.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-HUBBARD-BERKOFF-1993Report: 'Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous electrical activity (needle EMG study) (Hubbard, Berkoff, 1993) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index c…

    Hubbard & Berkoff 1993, spontaneous needle-EMG activity at trigger points, already in the ledger (doi:10.1097/00007632-199310000-00015), anchoring VASO-E001.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MCNULTY-1994Report: 'Psychological stressor effects on trigger point electrical activity (McNulty, Gevirtz, 1994) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index contains SRC-MC…

    McNulty, Gevirtz et al. 1994, trigger-point EMG response to a psychological stressor, already in the ledger (doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02220.x), anchoring VASO-E002.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-SHAH-2008Report: 'Microdialysis study of trigger point biochemistry (Shah) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index contains SRC-SHAH-2008.

    Shah's microdialysis work on the biochemical milieu at active trigger points is already in the ledger (doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018), anchoring VASO-E006.

    reopen if: The essay's description matches the 2005 Shah et al. J Appl Physiol microdialysis paper rather than the 2008 APMR paper; if the founder wants the earlier primary, it is a separate record to retrieve.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Fascia densification research (Stecco) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Essay p. 3 attributes the densification/scarring distinction to 'Carla Stec…

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. The Stecco group's densification concept (reversible hyaluronan viscosity between fascial layers, distinct from scarring) is a competing non-vascular state-level account of the dull-blockage phenomenology and possibly of rapid release, bearing on VASO-C011 and VASO-C020. No…

    reopen if: A primary Stecco-group paper on fascial densification is retrieved with text.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Sensory-motor amnesia concept (Hanna) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Not retrieved.

    Thomas Hanna's 'sensory-motor amnesia' is a conceptual framing from somatic education, not an empirical finding, and no ledger claim states or depends on it. It could serve only as background to the conventional guarding account already recorded in the assessment.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about chronic guarding degrading interoceptive access to the held region, for which Hanna's book would be secondary context behind the peer-reviewed cortical-remapping litera…

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Cortical smudging in chronic pain (sensory cortex body map degradation) (Moseley) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    No candidate resolved and no text retrieved. Cortical body-map degradation in chronic pain (Moseley/Flor lineage) is an alternative, non-vascular account of why a felt release follows attention-plus-pressure, and would qualify or contextualize VASO-C004 and the conventional explanation. Nothing can be anchored without…

    reopen if: A primary Moseley or Flor paper on somatosensory cortical reorganization in chronic pain is retrieved with text.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MOORE-CAO-2008Report: 'The hemo-neural hypothesis (Moore, Cao, 2008) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index contains SRC-MOORE-CAO-2008.

    Moore & Cao 2008, the hemo-neural hypothesis, already in the ledger (doi:10.1152/jn.01366.2006), anchoring VASO-E004. Note: the essay gives the second author as 'Rosalind Cao'; the ledger record's authorship should be checked against the paper itself, but no text was shown this pass.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-JOHNSON-2023Report: 'Vasocomputation hypothesis (Johnson, Michael Edward) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index contains SRC-JOHNSON-2023.

    Johnson's vasocomputation hypothesis is already in the ledger as SRC-JOHNSON-2023 (Principles of Vasocomputation, Part I), verified, anchoring VASO-E013.

  • sourceblockedReport: 'Tweet thread on vasocomputation and Buddhist enlightenment (Johnson, Michael Edward, 2024) — no OpenAlex result'. Essay p. 11 shows a screenshot dated…

    The Dec 2 2024 X thread by @johnsonmxe is reproduced in the essay only as a screenshot, and the essay is supplier's words, not a source. The thread is a proponent's own statement bearing on VASO-C021 (the tanha/vascular-tension identification); it would enter only as the source's statement of its own hypothesis, at ze…

    reopen if: The X post (and thread) is retrieved with text and a stable URL.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-MIZRACHI-2026Report: 'Voluntary attention regulating peripheral inflammatory response (histamine skin prick study) (Mizrachi, 2026) — no OpenAlex result'. Index contains SR…

    Mizrachi et al. 2026, voluntary attention regulating acute immune responses (histamine skin prick), already in the ledger (doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02541-1), anchoring VASO-E008.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Common neurobiology of pain and pleasure (pain offset/relief) (Leknes, Tracey) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Leknes & Tracey on the common neurobiology of pain and pleasure is cited by the essay for its 'euphoria of release' section; no ledger claim concerns the affective phenomenology of release, so the work bears on nothing currently in the case.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim that release events produce a rateable euphoria tracking stiffness/perfusion change.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Cinderella fibers hypothesis (low-threshold motor unit recruitment) (Hägg) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Hägg's 'Cinderella fiber' hypothesis is invoked by the essay as one of several speculative mechanisms for age-accumulation of knots; the ledger has no claim about age-accumulation mechanism (VASO-C001 states only common occurrence), so the work bears on no current record.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about knot burden rising with age or about low-threshold motor-unit overuse as a mechanism.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Mastering the Core Teachings of the Buddha (Ingram, Daniel) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Ingram's book is cited by the essay for the 'cascade warning' and harm-reduction argument, which the article records without a claim. No ledger claim concerns destabilization from rapid release or disclosure ethics.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about adverse effects of rapid release or meditation-related destabilization.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Research program on meditation-related adverse effects (Britton, Willoughby) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Britton's research on meditation-related adverse effects is the one peer-reviewed body of work behind the article's line 'the modern literature on meditation's adverse effects says the same', but the article makes that remark explicitly without a claim, and no ledger claim concerns adverse effects. It bears on no curr…

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about meditation-related adverse effects or rapid-release destabilization; the primary paper (e.g., the 'varieties of contemplative experience' study) should then be retrieve…

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Spiritual emergency concept (Grof, Stan) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Grof's 'spiritual emergency' concept is cited for the cascade-warning section; no ledger claim concerns it.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about crisis states following rapid release.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Autobiography on kundalini awakening (Krishna, Gopi) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Gopi Krishna's autobiography is a single first-person account cited for the cascade-warning section; no ledger claim concerns it, and as testimony it would carry no diagnostic weight on any mechanism claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about kundalini-crisis phenomenology as a first-person data class.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Bibliography of spontaneous remission case reports — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    The spontaneous-remission bibliography (attributed by the essay to the Institute of Noetic Sciences) concerns the essay's 'repair ceiling' argument, which is not a proposition in this ledger. Bears on no current claim.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about state-dependent repair or remission.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Work on bioelectric control of regeneration and morphology (Levin, Michael) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Levin's bioelectric regeneration work is cited for the essay's most speculative rung (repair as a callable subroutine), which the ledger does not carry as a claim. Bears on no current record.

    reopen if: The founder adds a claim about contemplative or autonomic states triggering regenerative programs.

  • sourceduplicateSRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026Report: 'Full-body ultrasonic tomography scanner announcement (2026) — no OpenAlex result close enough'. Index contains SRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026.

    The June 2026 full-body ultrasonic tomography announcement is already covered by SRC-BUTTERFLY-MIDJOURNEY-2026 (Butterfly Network's commentary press release), anchoring VASO-E018. Note the ledger record is a third-party commentary, not Midjourney's own announcement; the primary announcement would be a distinct record…

    reopen if: Midjourney Medical's own announcement is retrieved with text and URL, in which case it enters as a separate primary source rather than a duplicate.

  • sourceirrelevantReport: 'Cheetah House (resource for meditation-related adverse effects) — no OpenAlex result close enough'.

    Cheetah House is a support resource for meditation-related adverse effects, cited by the essay as a referral; it makes no empirical statement bearing on any ledger claim.

2026-09-09check5 of 5 seats judged the case blind$1.41

run 2026-09-09-check-vasocomputation-211232

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09check5 of 5 seats judged the case blind

run 2026-09-09-check-vasocomputation-072215

This run wrote no disposition rows.

2026-09-09check5 of 5 seats judged the case blind

run 2026-09-09-check-vasocomputation-044830

This run wrote no disposition rows.

Change history

Every change to this case, newest first: what changed, why, and who made it — including the AI's role. The log is append-only; a correction is a new entry, never an edit to an old one.

  1. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #412 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #412: 2 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-23-answer-vasocomputation-014335): answer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 1. Promoted: VASO-C191.

    Why: A seat's objection on #412 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  2. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 — the records relinked at the split · AI-assisted

    Records relinked to the parts of a split claim, read against them (VASO-C001 → VASO-C190, VASO-C191) (2026-09-21-reverify-vasocomputation-021624): re-verify: promoted 0, appended 2, refused 1, still unread 3. Appended: VASO-E108, VASO-E109. Refused: VASO-E028 (not one observation (The quoted passage accurately reflects the introduction's framing, and the locator is correct, but the sourceStatement bundles three distinct propositions (a cited prevalence figure attributed to Fishbain 1986, a claim about myofascial pain syndrome being a major cause of musculoskeletal pain, and the naming convention 'muscle knots'), so it is not atomic and should be split into separate parts. On direction: the 23-million prevalence figure is itself a pointer to an unretrieved 1986 study and concerns myofascial pain syndrome broadly, not specifically the prevalence of discrete tender points in the general population, so at most it is context for VASO-C191 rather than support; the passage does not itself establish that discrete tender points can be palpated (that is a methodological/clinical finding stated later in the paper), so it does not bear on VASO-C190 at all.); split into VASO-E108, VASO-E109).

    Why: A claim these records cited was found compound and replaced by its parts; a record's bearing on each part is read, not inherited (§3.5). What bears on a part keeps that link with the reader's stamps; what bears on none is refused; what could not be read stays provisional.

  3. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 3 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-21-answer-vasocomputation-021449): answer: promoted 1, appended 2, refused 2, still unread 0. Relinked to the parts of a split claim, provisional until read against them: VASO-E012, VASO-E015, VASO-E018, VASO-E028. Promoted: VASO-E082. Appended: VASO-C190, VASO-C191. Refused: VASO-E083 (second reader rejected (ofTheCompound): The quote and locator check out and, as the prior reader corrected, this passage only bears on VASO-C001 as background context about tender-point-count distributions, not as direct support for commonness of occurrence. But the record's title identifies it as 'part 2' concerning people reporting no pain with high tender-point counts, while the quoted sourceStatement instead restates the 'fewer than 11 tender points in chronic widespread pain' finding — the proposition already carried by the sibling part. This part does not state the proposition its own title and the compound-split assign to it, so it fails the compound-part check and should be re-split or re-quoted correctly.); VASO-C001 (not atomic (Without retrievable source text, quoteInContext, statementSupported and locatorSupported cannot be assessed and are reported false per instruction. The statement bundles two separable propositions—that discrete tender points occur, and that they are common across the general population—the latter of which the cited records (e.g. VASO-E015) explicitly say has never been measured, so it is not atomic. The proposition bears on the case's competing accounts of what muscle knots are, so it is relevant, and as a claim anchor independenceNoted is trivially true.); split into VASO-C190, VASO-C191).

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  4. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 2 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-21-answer-vasocomputation-012456): answer: promoted 2, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 0. Promoted: VASO-E082, VASO-C001.

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  5. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 1 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-21-answer-vasocomputation-002017): answer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 0. Promoted: VASO-C001.

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  6. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 1 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-211226): answer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 0. Promoted: VASO-C001.

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  7. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 1 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-210316): answer: promoted 1, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 0. Promoted: VASO-C001.

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  8. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: the split of VASO-C183 — VASO-C185.reviewState "ai_extracted" → "rejected" (a duplicate of VASO-C184), VASO-C186.reviewState "ai_extracted" → "rejected" (not a proposition C183 bundled); VASO-C188 and VASO-C189 added, the two propositions C183 bundled, on its anchor; VASO-C183.rejectionReason names them; relinked by their own words: VASO-E104: VASO-C182,VASO-C185,VASO-C186,VASO-C187,VASO-C184 → VASO-C182,VASO-C187,VASO-C184,VASO-C188,VASO-C189; VASO-E105: VASO-C186,VASO-C187 → VASO-C187,VASO-C188; VASO-E107: VASO-C186,VASO-C187 → VASO-C187,VASO-C189; VASO-E091: VASO-C005 → VASO-C005,VASO-C188,VASO-C189; VASO-E096: VASO-C005 → VASO-C005,VASO-C188; VASO-E098.reviewState "rejected" → "ai_extracted", citing VASO-C189.

    Why: The GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 at cded154: the split of VASO-C183 drifted — C185 duplicates C184 and C186 is an unrelated proposition — so the origin and the history did not record what was split. The compound's two propositions, active and latent each against palpably normal sites, enter on the compound's own anchor; the drifted parts are refused with the reason; the records that name a comparison are linked to it, each bearing read from the record's own words by the operator and said so; the panel judges the change.

  9. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: the exactLocator of each admitted part of VASO-E023 (VASO-E087, VASO-E088, VASO-E089, VASO-E090, VASO-E091, VASO-E092, VASO-E093, VASO-E096, VASO-E097, VASO-E099) narrowed to where its own quote is — 10 moved (VASO-E087 → Abstract; VASO-E088 → Abstract; VASO-E089 → Abstract; VASO-E090 → Abstract; VASO-E091 → Results; VASO-E092 → Results; VASO-E093 → Results; VASO-E096 → Results; VASO-E097 → Results; VASO-E099 → Results); a limitation added to saying that the abstract and the Results assign the ROC areas under the curve differently, and which records carry each.

    Why: The GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 at cded154: VASO-E101 quotes the abstract's AUC of 0.9 for active versus latent while the Results assign 0.9 to active versus normal, and its locator named both places — a contradicted locator would have published. Every part of the split inherited the compound's two-place locator; each is now placed where the pipeline's own retrieval finds its quote (Abstract, Results, or both), and the source's own disagreement between abstract and Results is said on the records that carry the abstract's figures. The parts' quotes and figures are unchanged.

  10. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 — the records relinked at the split · AI-assisted

    Records relinked to the parts of a split claim, read against them (VASO-E094 → VASO-E100, VASO-E101, VASO-E102, VASO-E103; VASO-E095 → VASO-E104, VASO-E105, VASO-E106, VASO-E107; VASO-C183 → VASO-C185, VASO-C186, VASO-C187) (2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-193207): re-verify: promoted 3, appended 0, refused 1, still unread 0. Promoted: VASO-E090, VASO-E091, VASO-E096. Refused: VASO-E098 (second reader rejected (relevant): The quoted statistic (AUC 0.79, fair classifier of latent vs normal sites) is accurately quoted and located, but it does not bear on any of the three newly split claims: it says nothing about the active-vs-latent area difference (C185), nothing about the normal-site mean area value of 0.17±0.22 cm2 (C187), and it is a classifier-performance statistic rather than a statement about trend similarity to pain pressure threshold scores (C186). Since the passage bears on none of the named claims, the record should be refused rather than linked with 'supports.').

    Why: A claim these records cited was found compound and replaced by its parts; a record's bearing on each part is read, not inherited (§3.5). What bears on a part keeps that link with the reader's stamps; what bears on none is refused; what could not be read stays provisional.

  11. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 3 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-192504): answer: promoted 0, appended 11, refused 3, still unread 0. Relinked to the parts of a split claim, provisional until read against them: VASO-E090, VASO-E091, VASO-E096, VASO-E098. Appended: VASO-E100, VASO-E101, VASO-E102, VASO-E103, VASO-E104, VASO-E105, VASO-E106, VASO-E107, VASO-C185, VASO-C186, VASO-C187. Refused: VASO-E094 (not one observation (The quote and AUC figures accurately reflect the abstract/results text, the locator is correct, the record properly flags NIH-lineage overlap, and the passage does support VASO-C005 by showing measurable stiffness-based distinction between active/latent/normal sites. However, the sourceStatement bundles three separate pairwise ROC/AUC findings (active-vs-latent, active-vs-normal, latent-vs-normal) into a single proposition, each of which could be true or false independently, so it is not atomic and should be split into one comparison per record as the panel objection notes.); split into VASO-E100, VASO-E101, VASO-E102, VASO-E103); VASO-E095 (not one observation (The quoted phrase and AUC figures (0.9, 0.8, 0.8) match the source's Abstract/Results ROC analysis exactly, correctly located, and the NIH-lineage overlap is properly disclosed. The 'context' direction is defensible since the ROC/AUC classification-strength finding does not itself restate the specific mean±SD area differences the three claims assert, so it bears on the topic without directly establishing those quantitative comparisons. However, the sourceStatement itself bundles three distinct pairwise AUC findings (active-vs-latent, active-vs-normal, latent-vs-normal) into a single statement, each of which is independently testable and could hold or fail separately — this is a compound statement that should be split, consistent with the panel's objection already raised about sibling records.); split into VASO-E104, VASO-E105, VASO-E106, VASO-E107); VASO-C183 (not atomic (The quoted sentence appears in Results and is used faithfully, and the normal-site value cited matches the abstract's reported figure, so the anchor is contextually and locator-accurate. However, the statement bundles two separable comparisons—active-vs-normal and latent-vs-normal—into a single claim, even though the ROC/AUC data in the source show these are independently testable relationships (e.g., different AUCs for each pairing), so it is not atomic. The proposition, once split, does bear on the case's competing mechanistic accounts of trigger point structure.); split into VASO-C185, VASO-C186, VASO-C187).

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  12. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 — the record relinked at the split of VASO-C033 in run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-172213, read against the parts by the operator's call after #390 gave the answer step this pass · AI-assisted

    Records relinked to the parts of a split claim, read against them (VASO-C033 → VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184) (2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-190441): re-verify: promoted 0, appended 13, refused 1, still unread 0. Appended: VASO-E087, VASO-E088, VASO-E089, VASO-E090, VASO-E091, VASO-E092, VASO-E093, VASO-E094, VASO-E095, VASO-E096, VASO-E097, VASO-E098, VASO-E099. Refused: VASO-E023 (not one observation (The quoted figures and ROC values accurately reflect the abstract/results text at the stated locator, correctly attributed and unqualified by hedging beyond what the source states, and the record properly flags shared NIH lineage with the Shah paper. The direction (supports) is correct toward all four named claims, since the passage directly reports the area comparisons and ROC discrimination cited by VASO-C182–184 and bears on the stiffness/blood-flow portion of the broader VASO-C005. However, the sourceStatement bundles several distinct findings (three group means, a pairwise significance claim, and three separate ROC AUC values) into one statement, so it is not atomic and should be split into part-level records for re-judging.); split into VASO-E087, VASO-E088, VASO-E089, VASO-E090, VASO-E091, VASO-E092, VASO-E093, VASO-E094, VASO-E095, VASO-E096, VASO-E097, VASO-E098, VASO-E099).

    Why: A claim these records cited was found compound and replaced by its parts; a record's bearing on each part is read, not inherited (§3.5). What bears on a part keeps that link with the reader's stamps; what bears on none is refused; what could not be read stays provisional.

  13. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: VASO-E023.reviewState — "rejected" → "provisional", the refusal written by run 2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-182525 reverted; the record stands as it did before that run, relinked to VASO-C182, VASO-C183 and VASO-C184 and provisional until read against them.

    Why: The run read the record against the parts and refused it as not one observation, and refused each of the splitter's four parts as not one observation either — every part still bundled two or three of the source's pairwise comparisons. A split that yields compound parts is a defect of the split, not a finding about the record: the source states each comparison on its own, and a second split round would reach them. The refusal is reverted so the read can be repeated once the split recurses; the run's record, spend and disposition row stand as written.

  14. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 — the record relinked at the split of VASO-C033 in run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-172213, read against the parts by the operator's call after #390 gave the answer step this pass · AI-assisted

    Records relinked to the parts of a split claim, read against them (VASO-C033 → VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184) (2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-182525): re-verify: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 1, still unread 0. Refused: VASO-E023 (not one observation (The quoted figures and ROC values match the source and are correctly attributed to the study's findings, and the locator points to the correct Results/Abstract passage. The record correctly supports VASO-C182–184 (exact area figures) and plausibly supports VASO-C005 as partial evidence of the stiffness component of that broader claim, with independence from the earlier Shah/Sikdar work duly noted. However, the sourceStatement bundles several distinct findings—three pairwise mean-area comparisons, a significance claim, and three separate ROC AUC classification results—into one statement, so it is not atomic and should be split into its component findings before further evaluation.); split into nothing that survived).

    Why: A claim these records cited was found compound and replaced by its parts; a record's bearing on each part is read, not inherited (§3.5). What bears on a part keeps that link with the reader's stamps; what bears on none is refused; what could not be read stays provisional.

  15. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 — the record relinked at the split of VASO-C033 in run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-172213, read against the parts by the operator's call after #390 gave the answer step this pass · AI-assisted

    Records relinked to the parts of a split claim, read against them (VASO-C033 → VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184) (2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-180503): re-verify: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 1.

    Why: A claim these records cited was found compound and replaced by its parts; a record's bearing on each part is read, not inherited (§3.5). What bears on a part keeps that link with the reader's stamps; what bears on none is refused; what could not be read stays provisional.

  16. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 — the record relinked at the split of VASO-C033 in run 2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-172213, read against the parts by the operator's call after #390 gave the answer step this pass · AI-assisted

    Records relinked to the parts of a split claim, read against them (VASO-C033 → VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184) (2026-09-20-reverify-vasocomputation-180358): re-verify: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 1.

    Why: A claim these records cited was found compound and replaced by its parts; a record's bearing on each part is read, not inherited (§3.5). What bears on a part keeps that link with the reader's stamps; what bears on none is refused; what could not be read stays provisional.

  17. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 7 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-172213): answer: promoted 3, appended 3, refused 4, still unread 0. Relinked to the parts of a split claim, provisional until read against them: VASO-E023. Promoted: VASO-E074, VASO-E077, VASO-E085. Appended: VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184. Refused: VASO-C033 (not atomic (The quoted text appears exactly in the Results paragraph on trigger point areas and is used in the same sense as the source (active > latent > normal in P<.01 comparisons), and the locator correctly points to that paragraph; the proposition also bears on the case's size/tissue-difference accounts. However, the statement bundles two distinct comparative findings (active-vs-latent and latent-vs-normal) into one sentence, so it is not a single atomic proposition and should be split into two separate claims each judged on its own comparison.); split into VASO-C182, VASO-C183, VASO-C184); VASO-E076 (every claim it cites was rejected); VASO-E084 (every claim it cites was rejected); VASO-E086 (every claim it cites was rejected).

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  18. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: VASO-E084, VASO-E085, VASO-E086.sourceStatement and exactLocator — each part narrowed to its single measured dimension, quoting the clause of the Results sentence and naming the Table 2 row that report it, in place of the Discussion phrase "larger, stiffer, and more painful" all three had carried.

    Why: The GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 at 46c1b14: the parts of the split each retained the compound assertion, so the split remained non-atomic; and the head edition's assessment cites VASO-E074, VASO-E076 and VASO-E077 for the calf parallel on VASO-C033 where the parts that carry it are these three. The statements are narrowed by hand from the article's full text read through Europe PMC (Results, paragraph beginning 'Among the 103 identified MTrPs'; Table 2); the edition is run again with the objection in view so the assessment cites the parts.

  19. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: VASO-E073.reviewState — "ai_extracted" → "rejected" (not one observation: pain, size and stiffness comparisons in one record); added VASO-E084, VASO-E085, VASO-E086, one finding each, every part quoting the source's sentence "active points were larger, stiffer, and more painful" and carrying its own figure from the Results and Table 2.

    Why: The GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 at 1b90b3a named VASO-E073 as a compound record the verification account had refused elsewhere for the same fault. The answer step sent it back to the reader, but PMC served a bot-challenge page in place of the article and the record was left as it stood; the operator read the article's full text through Europe PMC, located the passages verbatim, and split the record by hand as the verify verb splits a compound record — the parent refused with the reason, the parts appended with the lineage on their origin. No second model has read the parts; the constitutional panel judging #372 is their check.

  20. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 1 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-132548): answer: promoted 0, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 1.

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  21. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: VASO-R012.summary — the sentence naming "Olewnik et al. 2025 Sci Rep" as an unretrieved primary removed and "six papers" → "five papers", with a note that the sixth was retrieved and entered as SRC-LANDFALD-2025 (first author Landfald); VASO-R012.informationGain rewritten to the four observations still blocked, with the imaged stiffness reversal noted as now in the ledger as context. VASO-R020.informationGain — "The ledger's only objective record of a fast release … undermines the two-key claim without closing it" → the protocol's record (VASO-E067) is context, establishing what the method omitted, and its course ran to minutes, not seconds.

    Why: The GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 at 1b90b3a (§3.5, §3.6, §3.8, §3.9, §3.14): the R012 correction was incomplete — its title dropped Olewnik 2025 while the summary still counted it among six unretrieved primaries — and R020's information gain contradicted VASO-E067's corrected direction and the verification finding that the record establishes only an omitted breathing instruction. Research items are not fields the answer step's reader re-judges, so the operator corrects them by hand to agree with the ledger; the compound record the seat also named (VASO-E073) goes back through the reader.

  22. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 in the founder's session of 2026-09-20 · AI-assisted

    Correction by the operator: VASO-E067.title — "Landfald 2025: pressure with no breathing instruction sufficed to make most trigger points undetectable — part 3" → "Landfald 2025: the pressure-only compression protocol carried no breathing instruction, recording or manipulation — part 3"; VASO-E067.editorInference rewritten to state only what the record establishes (the method's omission) and where the protocol's outcomes are held (VASO-E072 on VASO-C005, VASO-E074 on VASO-C033).

    Why: The GPT-5.6 Sol seat's objection on #372 (§3.5, §3.6, §3.9): the record's title and inference spent outcome figures — about three-quarters of points cleared, all but two at 24 hours — that no admitted atomic record carries, the bundled outcome candidates having been refused at review. The answer step re-read the record (direction set to context by the second reader) and re-told the edition with the objection adopted; the title and the editor's inference are not fields the reader judges, so the operator corrects them by hand to the same scope. Nothing else in the record changes.

  23. aletheia answer (claude-sonnet-5 second reader), on #372 · AI-assisted

    Answer to the panel's objections on #372: 2 record(s) named by a seat re-read by the second reader with the objection in view (2026-09-20-answer-vasocomputation-124732): answer: promoted 2, appended 0, refused 0, still unread 0. Promoted: VASO-E067, VASO-C039.

    Why: A seat's objection on #372 named these records. The second reader read the sources again under the verify protocol with the objection in view; what held was kept with the reader's stamps, what did not was refused or split, and what could not be re-read was left as it stood. The panel judges the change again.

  24. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-20-report-vasocomputation-112413/report.md: 2 source(s), 18 evidence record(s), 1 claim(s), 1 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-20-draft-vasocomputation-113013, verification 2026-09-20-verify-vasocomputation-113521); 18 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml.

    Why: Admitted after verification: SRC-LANDFALD-2025, SRC-CROFT-1994, VASO-E067, VASO-E068, VASO-E069, VASO-E070, VASO-E071, VASO-E072, VASO-E073, VASO-E074, VASO-E075, VASO-E076, VASO-E077, VASO-E078, VASO-E079, VASO-E080, VASO-E081, VASO-E062, VASO-E082, VASO-E083, VASO-C181, VASO-R020; everything else proposed was refused or blocked with a reason in dispositions.yaml. The drafter's rationale for the proposal, written before verification and describing what it proposed: A narrow pass with one decisive retrieval and one incidental one. The 2025 runners' elastography study, which the edition ranks first among unretrieved primaries and names as 'Olewnik 2025', was retrieved in full from PubMed Central: its first author is Landfald (Podgórski and Olewnik follow), it is a prospective single-centre cohort with no control arm, and it reports that after one course of thumb compression, given with no breathing instruction anywhere in its methods, most palpated gastrocnemius trigger points were undetectable by palpation and strain elastography and none of the eliminated points recurred at 24 hours. That is the ledger's first objective imaged record of a fast, persistent change at a palpated knot. It supports VASO-C011 (the change is a change of state, whatever the state), undermines VASO-C039 as written (pressure without breath instruction sufficed), and qualifies VASO-C004; the caveat that breathing was uncontrolled and unrecorded is stated in every record and is the reason the strength is moderate, not decisive. It took no Doppler and had no sham arm, so nothing in it touches the vascular attribution (VASO-C020, VASO-C073) or the perforator picture; the stiff foci it imaged lie inside the muscle belly. Second, the report saw only a snippet of Croft, Schollum & Silman 1994, but I was shown the PMC abstract with Results: two general practices, an 18-site count, medians of six in women and three in men, and depression, fatigue and sleep scores rising with count independently of pain. That gives VASO-C083, C085, C086, C087 and C088 their first primary — with the important limitation, stated in each record, that the examined subsample was selected on reported pain, so the medians are not unselected community medians and the survey cannot speak to 'nearly universal' (VASO-C084, qualified). Six new observation claims are catalogued from the two sources, one proposition each. One correction removes the retrieved study from VASO-R012's title and fixes the attribution. One new research item specifies the test the two retrievals make decisive: the compression protocol repeated with breathing recorded and randomised among free breathing, slow exhale and inhale-and-hold, with an elastography endpoint. I could not write the report's proposed sharpening of VASO-R001/VASO-R003 as a correction because the packet does not show those records' current summary text, and the schema carries no image records, so the CC BY-NC-ND figure is dispositioned blocked with its route. The edition is left unchanged: the verdict does not move, and the article's conditional paragraph on the runners' study should be rewritten only after these records are verified and admitted; the change is load-bearing enough that the next edition pass should do so, and should correct 'Olewnik' to 'Landfald and colleagues' throughout.

  25. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1; proposal 2026-09-20-draft-vasocomputation-113013, verification 2026-09-20-verify-vasocomputation-113521) · AI-assisted

    Correction applied from proposals/2026-09-20-draft-vasocomputation-113013: VASO-R012.title — "Open the located-but-unretrieved primaries behind this pass (Banks 1998, Hubbard 1996, Chen 1998, Olewnik 2025, Zhang 2009, Ge 2011)" → "Open the located-but-unretrieved primaries behind this pass (Banks 1998, Hubbard 1996, Chen 1998, Zhang 2009, Ge 2011)".

    Why: VASO-R012: The 2025 runners' elastography study was retrieved in full this pass at PMC12647689 and enters as a source; it is no longer unretrieved. Its first author is Landfald (Podgórski and Olewnik follow), so 'Olewnik 2025' was also a misattribution. The remaining five items are unchanged.

  26. aletheia edition (claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Research agenda: VASO-R007 open → answered (Executed as study VASO-S001 (criteria frozen 2026-09-01; sixteen rows collected). Its table produced VASO-E019 (no energetic measurement exists in any arteriole; the economy argument rests on conduit arteries), VASO-E020 (pressurized skeletal-muscle arterioles show maintained or rising phosphorylation, not a latch signature) and VASO-E021 (latch behaviour present in the rabbit femoral artery and absent in its saphenous branch; never followed downstream). The map answered its own question — where the latch has been demonstrated — and fixed the boundary condition VASO-R004's paired-caliber design now targets; whether knots are vascular remains open under R001, R004 and R016.).

    Why: Set by the edition verb (claude-fable-5-1, edition-v10) in run 2026-09-19-edition-vasocomputation-115913, reading the agenda against the ledger as it stands; the edition edition-2026-09-19-120813 carries the reasoning.

  27. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering the panel's park on PR #286 in the founder's session of 2026-09-11 · AI-assisted

    Correction applied from PR #286 panel review (GPT-5.6 Sol seat: same-case shorthand ids escaped the check): VASO-R019.summary — "Desk retrieval of the eleven published works the essay restates as support, so that the essay's remaining claims (C128–C130, C136–C143 and C145) can be anchored to primaries and the essay-derived evidence records re-weighed; check Maurer et al. 2019 as the contrary dissection." → "Desk retrieval of the eleven published works the essay restates as support, so that the essay's remaining claims (C128–C130, C136–C143) can be anchored to primaries and the essay-derived evidence records re-weighed; check Maurer et al. 2019 as the contrary dissection.".

    Why: VASO-R019: shorthand 'C145' named a proposal claim that never entered the ledger

  28. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), answering review note #285 in the founder's session of 2026-09-11 · AI-assisted

    Corrections applied from review note #285 (GPT-5.6 Sol seat on #283): the dangling-id check must hold for every record: VASO-R018.summary — "Recruit practitioners who report having completed the release process; blinded examiner, standardized sites, pressure algometry, light-touch and pinprick sensory exam, Doppler perforator map, elastography, against age-matched controls. A blinded finding of no tender points in a middle-aged adult with normal sensation and normally perfused perforators supports VASO-C124; reduced sensation with constricted perforators supports the hypoesthesia confound VASO-C125." → "Recruit practitioners who report having completed the release process; blinded examiner, standardized sites, pressure algometry, light-touch and pinprick sensory exam, Doppler perforator map, elastography, against age-matched controls. A blinded finding of no tender points in a middle-aged adult with normal sensation and normally perfused perforators supports the perforator account; reduced sensation with constricted perforators supports the hypoesthesia confound."; VASO-R019.summary — "Desk retrieval of the eleven published works the essay restates as support, so that VASO-C108, C128–C130, C136–C143 and C145 can be anchored to primaries and the essay-derived evidence records re-weighed; check Maurer et al. 2019 as the contrary dissection." → "Desk retrieval of the eleven published works the essay restates as support, so that the essay's remaining claims (C128–C130, C136–C143 and C145) can be anchored to primaries and the essay-derived evidence records re-weighed; check Maurer et al. 2019 as the contrary dissection.".

    Why: VASO-R018: prose named a record id the ledger does not hold — provisional claim id (review note #285: no dangling ids, everywhere) | VASO-R019: prose named a record id the ledger does not hold — provisional claim id; closes the bracket the previous rule opened (review note #285: no dangling ids, everywhere)

  29. claude-fable-5-1 (operator), on the founder's direction in session 2026-09-09 · AI-assisted

    The editorial conjecture file retired (VASO-J001, by "Eugene (ejhong)", dated 2026-08-23, status open). The card leaves the case page. Its propositions are the ledger's — a tender point that objectively releases within seconds being an actively maintained state, not remodeled tissue (VASO-C011), the latch-bridge physiology beneath it (VASO-C010), pressure alone not releasing a knot where pressure with a slow exhale does (VASO-C039), the exhale as the voluntary handle on the autonomic system (VASO-C013, VASO-C098), the latch-bridge mechanism (VASO-C020) — and its decisive tests are VASO-R001 and VASO-R004; its rationale is the founder's essay "Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation", a founding input (VASO-IN002) and the ledger's source SRC-JHONG-2026. Banked here, as the file recorded them, are the founder's stake and the tests he named. Statement: "Muscle knots are real, actively maintained physiological states — not perceptual artifacts and not structural damage — and the decisive clue to their nature is that sustained attention plus breath alone, on a long exhale, releases them in seconds." Confidence: "High that the knots are real and that breath-triggered release is a genuine physiological event — grounded in years of direct first-person experimentation with rolling. Moderate, and stated as intuition, on the specific vascular latch-bridge mechanism." Predicted findings: (1) "Imaging a single release event (elastography + Doppler through the same probe) shows a rapid, local change in stiffness and perfusion time-locked to the exhale, on a seconds timescale incompatible with structural remodeling." (2) "Active knots show the state-not-structure signature: stiff on elastography, electrically active on EMG, hemodynamically abnormal on Doppler (retrograde flow, elevated pulsatility), yet largely invisible to structural imaging." (3) "Direct measurement at tender points demonstrates a smooth-muscle latch state (sustained tension at disproportionately low energy turnover — a metabolic cold spot rather than the 'energy crisis' hot spot)." (4) "Breath-and-attention protocols without external pressure produce measurable releases at reachable sites, weaker but of the same physiological kind as pressure-plus-breath." What would prove it wrong: (1) "The keystone imaging experiment (VASO-R001-class), adequately instrumented, finds no local physiological change accompanying clear felt releases — the release is then perceptual, and the maintained-state claim should be marked refuted." (2) "Direct latch-sensitive measurement at tender points, validated on known latch-bridge controls, finds no latch state — the vascular mechanism should then be dropped even if the knots-as-states claim survives by another mechanism." (3) "Time-locking fails: measured tissue changes follow releases by hours-to-days rather than seconds, consistent with remodeling — the breath-as-key inference should then be withdrawn."

    Why: Founder direction (2026-09-09, in session): a bet with a stated confidence and a disconfirmer is a claim, graded honestly against the evidence, not a registry beside the ledger; the essays are founding inputs and their propositions enter as claims. What the founder believed ahead of the evidence, and what he staked it on, belongs in the append-only changelog (AGENTS.md §7, amendment of 2026-09-01). The conjecture carried no evidential weight, so no standing changes; the file's text remains in git history.

  30. scripts/migrations/2026-09-09-links-by-part.ts · AI-assisted

    Links the atomicity pass had fanned out from a compound claim to all of its parts were dropped (§3.2): VASO-C065.parentClaimIds → VASO-C091, VASO-C092 (parts of VASO-C064); VASO-C087.parentClaimIds → VASO-C083, VASO-C084, VASO-C085, VASO-C086 (parts of VASO-C059); VASO-C088.parentClaimIds → VASO-C083, VASO-C084, VASO-C085, VASO-C086 (parts of VASO-C059); VASO-C089.parentClaimIds → VASO-C083, VASO-C084, VASO-C085, VASO-C086 (parts of VASO-C059); VASO-C093.parentClaimIds → VASO-C091, VASO-C092 (parts of VASO-C064); VASO-C093.dependsOnClaimIds → VASO-C091, VASO-C092 (parts of VASO-C064); VASO-C094.parentClaimIds → VASO-C091, VASO-C092 (parts of VASO-C064); VASO-C094.dependsOnClaimIds → VASO-C091, VASO-C092 (parts of VASO-C064).

    Why: A link to a compound claim is not a link to each of its parts; the 2026-09-09 split-compound pass carried them wholesale. Each part's relations are its own to propose in a later pass. Research links stay: a study designed to move the compound bears on what it said, which is its parts.

  31. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-053800/report.md: 1 source(s), 6 evidence record(s), 50 claim(s), 5 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-053853, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-061156); 36 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml.

    Why: Inbox intake of the founder's second essay, 'Knots of Existence Hypotheses' (Eugene Jhong, Substack, 2026-09-08, text generated wholly by Fable 5.1). The item is marked NEW TO THE LEDGER AND SUPPLIED BY ITS AUTHOR, so it enters as a provisional Source record labelled for what it is — a self-published, AI-generated hypothesis essay by the case's proponent — and its distinct testable propositions are catalogued as unfeatured, ungraded claims anchored to it by page, for the editions to weigh. The essay's central move is a competing account of the anchor phenomenon: knots as cutaneous perforators (artery–nerve–lymphatic bundles through fascial rings) held in a stuck state, breath-gated by the inspiratory vasoconstrictor reflex, collared by gelled hyaluronan, tethering a continuous superficial-fascial sheet — an alternative to the ledger's intramuscular latched-arteriole attribution (VASO-C020), linked with alternativeToRefs rather than merged. A second family of reports (sheet separation, folds, hollows, air) is catalogued as mechanism claims with the essay's own physician's-road alternative (hyperventilation paresthesia) entered as a competing claim. Where the essay restates published findings (Heine, Dorsher, Langevin, Segal & Duling, Hong & Simons, Taylor & Palmer, Lindahl, Sikdar, Moraska, Cagnie, Fede), the propositions enter as claims anchored to the essay and as weak/context evidence toward existing claims, with limitations stating that no primary was retrieved. Every one of the 39 works the report lists as 'no OpenAlex result' is dispositioned: four are ledger duplicates, most are blocked with a retrieval route, two are irrelevant. Where a proposition already exists in the index (fascial densification reversibility, VASO-C077; cascade, VASO-C065; blood-first, VASO-C073), the essay's passage enters as evidence or as a refining child claim rather than a new duplicate. No corrections: no source text was reached at a URL. Edition unchanged: the pass adds hypothesis material and secondary restatements, not a load-bearing finding; the current telling remains correct, and the perforator alternative should be weighed at the next assessment once its primaries are retrieved. Nothing is graded here.

  32. scripts/migrations/2026-09-09-split-compound.ts (reader claude-sonnet-5, splitter claude-fable-5-1; run 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-052024) · AI-assisted

    Atomicity pass (§3.2) over the 34 claims admitted from the founding essay on 2026-09-09: 12 compound claim(s) split into 21 atomic claim(s) and marked rejected (VASO-C038 → VASO-C075+VASO-C076; VASO-C042 → VASO-C077; VASO-C049 → VASO-C078; VASO-C053 → VASO-C079+VASO-C080; VASO-C057 → VASO-C081+VASO-C082; VASO-C059 → VASO-C083+VASO-C084+VASO-C085+VASO-C086; VASO-C060 → VASO-C087+VASO-C088+VASO-C089; VASO-C061 → VASO-C090; VASO-C064 → VASO-C091+VASO-C092; VASO-C066 → VASO-C093+VASO-C094; VASO-C067 → VASO-C095; VASO-C074 → ); 0 evidence record(s) re-pointed at the parts.

    Why: The Arbiter parked the intake for compound claims; the second reader judged each claim's atomicity on its own anchor and the drafter split the compound ones (protocol split-v1). Verify v3 does this at intake from now on.

  33. aletheia correction writer, applied by hand: the verifier admitted two claims whose parents it had rejected (fixed in verify the same hour) · AI-assisted

    Corrections applied from proposals/2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-042321: VASO-C061.parentClaimIds — "VASO-C037" → ""; VASO-C067.parentClaimIds — "VASO-C062" → "".

    Why: VASO-C061: VASO-C037 was rejected by the second reader in the same verification (2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-042925); a claim may not name a parent the ledger does not hold. The link is dropped; the claim stands. | VASO-C067: VASO-C062 was rejected by the second reader in the same verification; the link is dropped, the claim stands.

  34. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-031907/report.md: 0 source(s), 10 evidence record(s), 28 claim(s), 2 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-042321, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-042925); 12 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml.

    Why: Inbox intake whose single item is marked as the ledger's source SRC-JHONG-2026 (the founder's Substack essay, text generated by AI models at the author's direction). Under that marker its distinct testable propositions are catalogued as unfeatured, ungraded claims anchored by [p. N] and verbatim quote, and its statements bearing on existing claims enter as evidence records honest to the source's nature (an AI-written, secondary essay: context or weak supports, with limitations). Propositions already held by the ledger (VASO-C001, C002, C003, C004, C005, C010, C011, C012, C013, C020, C021, C022, C030, C031–C036) are not re-created; the essay's restatements of them enter as evidence, marked derivative where the essay only relays a primary already in the ledger. Of the 23 works the item names, one resolved to a DOI whose retrieval returned only 'Redirecting' (failed, unconfirmable); the rest were not resolved and are dispositioned as duplicates of index records, blocked with a route (where a newly catalogued claim now gives them something to bear on), or irrelevant. No source text was shown for any named work, so nothing is anchored to them. Two research items are added: the essay's PET 'metabolically cold' triple-signature prediction, which would discriminate latch from energy-crisis and inflammatory accounts, and a desk retrieval of the adverse-effects and pain–pleasure primaries behind the newly catalogued affective claims. The edition is unchanged: the new claims are hypothesis material for future editions to weigh, and nothing shown contradicts the current telling.

  35. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-09-report-vasocomputation-023157/report.md: 2 source(s), 11 evidence record(s), 6 claim(s), 2 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-040754, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-041231); 0 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml.

    Why: Bounded pass. Of the eleven sources the report proposed, only two arrived with text: the PMC author manuscript of Ballyns et al. 2011 (full text) and the Ovid abstract page of Simons, Hong & Simons 2002. Both are new to the index and enter as ai_verified sources with evidence and observation-rung claims extracted from the shown text. Ballyns supplies the primary Doppler and elastography numbers the article currently describes second-hand (55/40/31% retrograde flow, PI 8.3 vs 3.0, area 0.57/0.36/0.17 cm²), plus the source's own alternative explanations for high outflow resistance, which keep its bearing on VASO-C020 weightless between compression and arteriolar constriction. Simons 2002 shows endplate noise at 4 of 11 non-trigger-point endplate-zone sites and none off the endplate zone, which contradicts the 'absent in adjacent non-tender muscle' half of VASO-C002; a scalar correction to that statement is proposed and the evidence is recorded as qualifying. Everything else the report reached — Banks 1998, Hubbard 1996, Chen 1998, Rivner 2001, Ge 2011, Olewnik 2025, Zhang 2009, the 2014 densification review, the Mazza abstract — returned 403s, bot-challenge pages, 'Redirecting', or a cookie wall, so their observations (relaxation lowering nidus EMG, alpha-blockade quieting it, pressure-alone stiffness reversal at 24 h, attenuated skin-flow response, densification 'easily reversible') stay blocked with routes, and no quotation from them is written. No verdict is graded here; the C002 correction and the Ballyns primary should be weighed at the next assessment. The edition is left unchanged: the pass deepens the record and sharpens one claim statement but does not show the telling wrong, misordered, or missing a load-bearing finding.

  36. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1; proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-040754, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-041231) · AI-assisted

    Correction applied from proposals/2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-040754: VASO-C002.statement — "Trigger points exhibit sustained spontaneous needle-EMG activity confined to a m" → "Trigger points exhibit sustained spontaneous needle-EMG activity at a millimeter".

    Why: VASO-C002: Simons, Hong & Simons 2002 (SRC-SIMONS-2002, abstract shown) found endplate noise at all 11 trigger-point sites but also at 4 of 11 non-trigger-point endplate-zone sites, and at none of the taut-band sites off the endplate zone, concluding it is 'characteristic of, but is not restricted to' the trigger point. 'Absent in adjacent non-tender muscle' is contradicted when the adjacent site lies in the endplate zone; the corrected statement keeps the gradient the record supports (VASO-E001, VASO-E031, VASO-E032).

  37. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-021637/report.md: 0 source(s), 0 evidence record(s), 0 claim(s), 0 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-040401, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-040612); 0 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml.

    Why: Inbox intake of the founder's own Substack essay (34 pp., text generated by Kimi and Fable). The item does not carry the 'THIS DOCUMENT IS THE LEDGER'S SOURCE' marker and the report's stated footing is discovery material, so the essay is supplier's words: it is already in the ledger as SRC-JHONG-2026 and no claims or evidence are catalogued from it here. Of the 29 works the essay names, 25 resolved to nothing on OpenAlex; four resolved to DOI candidates, but none yielded text (two landing pages returned only the word 'Redirecting', two returned HTTP 403), and in all four cases the candidate's OpenAlex title indicates a different work from the one the essay meant (a 2019 fibromyalgia diagnostic-criteria paper rather than 1990s community tender-point surveys; a review of regression cases spanning 1900–1987 rather than Everson & Cole's classic; an arthroscopy-for-osteoarthritis trial whose title does not describe a sham-surgery design; a 2022 PIEZO review rather than the discovery paper or the prize). Each wrong candidate is dispositioned failed and the work meant stays blocked or irrelevant. Ten named works are duplicates of records the ledger already holds; three (Stecco densification, Moseley cortical smudging, the Johnson X thread) remain blocked pending primary text; the rest concern the essay's euphoria, cascade-warning and repair-ceiling sections, which carry no ledger claim. No URL was reached for any text, so no url correction is owed. No new evidence, claims, or sources enter; the edition is unchanged, which after a pass that verified nothing new is the correct outcome. VASO-R010 already covers the one retrieval route worth pressing (the tender-point-count surveys), so no new research item is added.

  38. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-021500/report.md: 0 source(s), 0 evidence record(s), 0 claim(s), 1 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-035914, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-040201); 5 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml. 1 correction(s) NOT applied — see proposals/2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-040201/verification.md.

    Why: This is an inbox intake of the founder's own essay (already SRC-JHONG-2026 / VASO-IN002), and the report itself states the footing: supplier's words, discovery material, records only from the works it names. The item does not carry the 'THIS DOCUMENT IS THE LEDGER'S SOURCE' marker, so I have not catalogued the essay's propositions as claims here; if the founder wants that done, the marker is the route. Of the works named, two resolved to DOIs and both are already ledger records. Only Hubbard & Berkoff 1993 returned text (abstract only), which confirms the record is the right work and confirms the observation behind VASO-E001. The abstract also states two things the ledger does not yet carry — higher spontaneous-EMG amplitude in tension-headache and fibromyalgia patients than in normals, and the authors' own attribution of the nidus to sympathetically activated intrafusal (spindle) contractions — so I add two claims and three evidence records from that text, the latter being an autonomic-but-skeletal generator that competes with the vascular version of VASO-C020. Hai & Murphy returned HTTP 403 and is a duplicate anyway. Every other named work is dispositioned; most repeat the prior pass's dispositions, and the newly listed items (fibromyalgia-era community tender-point counts, radical-remission interviews, brown fat, Piezo, sham surgery, wound-healing studies) are handled fresh. The one new item that bears on a ledger claim is the community tender-point-count literature, which is a proto-census for VASO-C001; it is blocked pending a primary paper and gets a desk research item. A url correction is proposed for SRC-HUBBARD-BERKOFF-1993 since the report reached its text at the DOI. No edition change: nothing here alters the telling.

  39. aletheia verify (claude-sonnet-5 second reader; drafter claude-fable-5-1) · AI-assisted

    Intake from report proposals/2026-09-09-inbox-vasocomputation-021828/report.md: 0 source(s), 0 evidence record(s), 0 claim(s), 2 research item(s) verified and added (proposal 2026-09-09-draft-vasocomputation-021940, verification 2026-09-09-verify-vasocomputation-022224); 0 candidate(s) rejected with reasons in dispositions.yaml.

    Why: Inbox intake of the founder's own essay (already in the ledger as SRC-JHONG-2026, verified). The supplied text is the supplier's words and is not a source; only the published works it names can enter, and only from retrieved text. The report resolved one candidate (Everson & Cole → doi 10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90023-7), but the retrieved text for that DOI is the single word 'Redirecting' (the truncated URL returned HTTP 404), so neither the candidate's identity nor any content can be confirmed; it stays blocked, and in any case spontaneous remission bears on no proposition in this ledger. All 21 other named works returned no OpenAlex candidate and no text. Eight of them are already ledger records (Hai & Murphy, Hubbard & Berkoff, McNulty, Shah, Moore & Cao, Johnson 2023, Mizrachi, the whole-body scanner announcement) and are dispositioned duplicate. Three unretrieved works bear on ledger claims and are blocked with routes (Stecco densification → VASO-C011/C020; Moseley cortical remapping → conventional account of VASO-C004; Johnson's 2024 thread → VASO-C021). The remaining ten (pain-relief neurobiology, Cinderella fibers, meditation adverse-effect literature, spontaneous-remission and regeneration literature, Cheetah House) address essay themes — euphoria of release, cascade risk, the repair ceiling — that have no claim in the ledger; they are irrelevant to the current record and reopen only if the founder adds such claims. No quotation can be written, so no sources, evidence, or claims are added; no correction is possible because no ledger source's text was reached at a URL. Two desk research routes are proposed: retrieving the fascial-densification literature as a competing reversible non-vascular mechanism for seconds-scale release, and locating the phentolamine trigger-point study the essay attributes to the Hubbard lineage (named in the essay but omitted from the report's works list). One note for the founder rather than a correction: the essay's first page states 'Text Generated fully by Kimi and Fable'; SRC-JHONG-2026's reliability notes should record AI generation if they do not already, but the existing field value was not shown so no from/to can be written. The edition is unchanged: nothing verified this pass bears on the telling.

  40. scripts/migrations/2026-09-09-hash-locators.ts (mechanical re-stamp) · AI-assisted

    Ledger hash redefined to exclude source locators (url, archivedUrl); 1 edition/assessment basis stamp(s) recomputed mechanically, content unchanged: edition-2026-09-08-migration.yaml.

    Why: Founder decision 2026-09-09: a locator says where a record is read, not what it says; a by-hand URL addition had set a fresh panel aside and made an edition due that could only re-adopt.

  41. Cursor Grok 4.6 (Cursor cloud agent), directed by the founder; runId title-punctuation-2026-09-08; promptVersion none (founder-directed session, not a pipeline prompt) · AI-assisted

    Case title punctuation restored after the pre-overhaul publication restore: "State, Not Scar?" is again "State, Not Scar". The trailing question mark is dropped so the published name is a statement. Subtitle and framing questions are unchanged.

    Why: Founder direction (first given 2026-09-06, reaffirmed 2026-09-08 after the restore): case names should not carry question marks. The interrogative belongs in the subtitle and the research questions, not on the card and in the header.

  42. scripts/migrations/2026-09-08-editions.ts (mechanical), founder-directed session · AI-assisted

    Migrated to editions (docs/AUTOMATION.md, build step 2). The article, the 14-claim featured set, and the displayed judgment now live in edition edition-2026-09-08-migration, which adopts the migration assessment 2026-09-08-migration-vasocomputation. Claim records carry propositions and anchors only; evaluative fields moved into the adopted assessment's per-claim treatment; the dossier header, research priority, and component verdicts moved from case.yaml into the assessment; claims-catalog.yaml merged into claims.yaml (tiers ended). No judgment changed.

    Why: One reader-facing unit that binds verdict, selection, and article, so they cannot drift apart; one home for judgment; featuring becomes a recorded decision.

  43. anthropic/claude-fable-5 (scheduled maintenance run, aletheia-editorial-audit-v1); publishes only through the constitutional gate's multi-model concurrence, per AGENTS.md §3.15 · AI-assisted

    Corrected the overview's count of the research agenda from six project designs to seven, noting that the latch evidence map (VASO-R007) has been executed as VASO-S001 with its findings already incorporated into the article's conventional-account section. Shifted the premise sentence of VASO-R007's summary into the past tense, since the ledger now contains the arteriole-level records (VASO-E019–E021) that the study was designed to produce.

    Why: The execution of VASO-R007 added a seventh agenda item's results to the ledger, leaving the overview's item count and the research item's present-tense premise factually out of date.

  44. anthropic/claude-fable-5 (scheduled maintenance run, aletheia-editorial-audit-v1); publishes only through the constitutional gate's multi-model concurrence, per AGENTS.md §3.15 · AI-assisted

    Updated the research agenda entry for the latch evidence map (VASO-R007), whose summary already noted execution as VASO-S001 but whose information-gain text still presented the study's possible outcomes as undecided. The field now reports what the completed map found: latch demonstrations confined to large conduit preparations, no arteriole energetic measurement anywhere, arteriole-level constriction tracking maintained activation rather than a latch, and latch behaviour lost one branch order downstream of the one parent vessel tested. No changes were needed to the overview article, whose conventional-account section already reflects these records.

    Why: Evidence records VASO-E019, VASO-E020, and VASO-E021 report the results of the study VASO-R007 proposed; leaving its outcomes phrased as open possibilities would misstate the current state of the record to readers of the agenda.

  45. anthropic/claude-opus-5 (scheduled maintenance run, aletheia-editorial-audit-v1); publishes only through the constitutional gate's multi-model concurrence, per AGENTS.md §3.15 · AI-assisted

    Corrected the research agenda's keystone mechanism study (VASO-R004), which still described the vessel-class evidence audit VASO-S001 as work in progress. The ledger now carries that study's completed tables, so the item states the audit's finding instead: latch behaviour present in a parent artery and absent one branch order downstream. The paired-caliber design itself is unchanged.

    Why: A research item may not present as pending an audit whose results the evidence records now report, since that misstates what remains to be done.

  46. anthropic/claude-opus-5 (scheduled maintenance run, aletheia-editorial-audit-v1); publishes only through the constitutional gate's multi-model concurrence, per AGENTS.md §3.15 · AI-assisted

    Corrected the section on the conventional account, which presented the latch mechanism as simply unobserved in the relevant tissue. The records now show that pressurized skeletal-muscle arterioles have in fact been measured with the appropriate molecular readout and display maintained activation rather than the latch signature, that arteriolar energetic cost has never been measured anywhere, and that latch behaviour was absent one branch order downstream in the only paired vessel comparison published.

    Why: A reader would otherwise infer that the arteriole compartment is untested, when the evidence records report it has been examined and points toward a different mechanism for holding constriction.

  47. Aletheia editorial AI (Claude Opus 5, Cursor cloud agent) · AI-assisted

    Study VASO-S001 collected: sixteen rows, five findings, criteria hash fe5e031b8b8f re-verified unchanged from the freeze. Three findings enter the ledger as evidence. VASO-E019 (undermines VASO-C020): contemporaneous energetic measurement appears only in large tonic conduit arteries at zero transmural pressure and in no arteriole of any bed, and no located study meets all four conditions the study set. VASO-E020 (undermines VASO-C020): the target compartment is not unexamined — three rows are pressurized rat cremaster and gracilis resistance vessels with LC20 phosphorylation measured against diameter, and in all three maintained constriction is accompanied by maintained or rising phosphorylation rather than force held while activation falls. VASO-E021 (qualifies VASO-C010): the one published comparison between a vessel and its own downstream branch found latch behaviour in rabbit femoral artery and absent in the saphenous, and forward citation chaining found nobody extended it into the microcirculation. Persistence after stimulus withdrawal is untested at every caliber; the only persistence result in the table is a purified-myosin reconstitution.

    Why: Executing VASO-R007 at desk cost, per the pre-registration that merged in PR #125. The result is more informative than the expected null: the inferential step under C020 is confirmed as an extrapolation across vessel class and caliber, but the reason is not that nobody has looked at arterioles — it is that those who looked measured activation and found it sustained, which points at Rho-kinase-mediated calcium sensitization rather than a dephosphorylated latch as the mechanism holding a small vessel shut. Recorded with the limitation that every row was built from a published abstract, no full text being accessible to the collection.

  48. Aletheia editorial AI (Claude Opus 5, Cursor cloud agent) · AI-assisted

    Study VASO-S001 pre-registered (freeze only, zero rows), executing the new desk research item VASO-R007: an evidence map of every eligible primary report in which sustained vascular force or constriction was measured alongside a contemporaneous readout of activation, cross-bridge cycling, or energetic cost. Criteria hash fe5e031b8b8f. Frozen design decisions, each taken before any data exists: every row carries TWO independent grades (how directly it evidences the phenomenon, and how close its preparation is to a pressurized skeletal-muscle arteriole), so a strong result in a remote tissue cannot be counted as direct support for VASO-C020; the energetic criterion admits oxygen consumption, heat, lactate and phosphocreatine rather than a measured ATPase alone; caliber is recorded with the transmural pressure at which it was measured; and stimulus persistence after withdrawal is a column, because economical maintenance under continuing activation is a different finding from a state that holds on its own. Eight known candidates pre-committed with dispositions, seven resolved to primary documents at freeze and one recorded as an unlocated lead. VASO-R004 amended in the same change to a paired-caliber, pressurized design with an explicit stimulus-withdrawal phase. Collection follows in a separate PR.

    Why: C020 rests on an inferential step the ledger never checked — latch behaviour exists in vascular smooth muscle, therefore it can hold a skeletal-muscle microvessel shut — and VASO-E016 already grades the vascular linchpin D on an admittedly incomplete search. Whether the published record contains a demonstration at the caliber the hypothesis needs is answerable at desk cost, and is worth answering before VASO-R004 is designed rather than after. Freezing first is what keeps the criteria from being tuned to the answer (§3.12). Prompted by unverified pre-freeze commentary relayed by the founder from another model, preserved verbatim in inbox/processed/2026-09-01-study-vaso-s001-freeze/; its literature assertions are recorded as leads to be verified at collection, not imported as evidence.

  49. Fable (AI agent), directed by Eugene · AI-assisted

    Fifth independent judge added to the cross-model check: Kimi K3 (Moonshot's open-weights model, served via Venice) re-assessed the case blind under the same protocol as the four frontier judges. Its case verdict and per-claim verdicts appear on the concurrence panel and claim pages alongside the others; concurrence statistics recomputed over five judges.

    Why: An open-weights judge from a different training lineage strengthens the independence of the check — agreement across five vendors, including one outside the Western frontier labs, is harder to attribute to shared disposition.

  50. Fable (AI agent), directed by Eugene · AI-assisted

    Cross-model check run (scripts/cross-model-check.mjs, promptVersion aletheia-check-v1): four independent judges — Opus 5 (Anthropic), GPT-5.1 (OpenAI), Gemini 3.1 Pro (Google), Grok 4.6 (xAI) — each re-assessed the case blind to all prior assessments. Result: unanimous case verdict (unresolved) matching the displayed draft; claim agreement 9/14 exact, 2 within one step, 3 split (VASO-C001, VASO-C003, VASO-C004 — notably the observation-rung claims about tender points and felt release, not the theory claims). Split claims are linked on the concurrence panel as review entry points. Check runs never display as the case narrative.

    Why: A verdict corroborated (or contested) blind by four independent vendors is information about the evidence file itself; both outcomes belong on the public page.

  51. Eugene (conjecture); recorded by Fable (AI agent) · AI-assisted

    Editorial conjecture recorded (VASO-J001, conjectures.yaml): the founder's on-the-record bet that muscle knots are actively maintained physiological states, grounded in first-person rolling experience, with the breath-triggered seconds-timescale release named as the decisive clue and the keystone imaging experiment plus direct latch measurement (VASO-R001, VASO-R004) staked as the tests. Conjectures carry no evidential weight and do not touch any claim's credibility.

    Why: A truth-seeking system must be able to demonstrate that its founder's best intuition was wrong; recording the bet with disconfirmers is how.

  52. Eugene (direction); applied by Fable (AI agent) · AI-assisted

    Site v1.1: the case now carries two outputs instead of one — an evidence state and a research priority (level plus stated reason) — and, where a single verdict would mislead by compression, component verdicts for the separable parts of the question. Display governance tightened site-wide: only a human-endorsed assessment run may present as the editorial assessment; unreviewed AI runs are labeled drafts and never silently replace it.

    Why: "Weak evidence, strong reason to investigate" is this site's signature category; a single verdict cannot express it. Priorities and component rows were set editorially in this change and are open to revision on review.

  53. Fable (AI agent), directed by Eugene · AI-assisted

    Case built for Aletheia: 14 claims, 18 evidence records, 15 sources, 6 research opportunities extracted from the essay and the critical report. Citation verification batch run the same day via Crossref and publisher pages: all 12 checkable external citations found real — including the two flagged as suspicious (Mizrachi et al., Nature Human Behaviour, published 2026-08-17; the Midjourney/Butterfly ultrasonic scanner announcement of 2026-06-18). Two author-name corrections recorded (Rosa Cao, not "Rosalind"; first author Jammal Salameh, not "Salameh AI"). The essay's phentolamine/relaxation-training follow-up lineage could not be traced to a primary citation and is carried as unverified second-hand characterization. All claims labeled ai_extracted pending human review; first AI assessment overlay generated and labeled as an unreviewed draft.

    Why: Launch case #2 on real, provenance-labeled content with symmetric supporting and undermining evidence.

  54. AI deep-research agent, commissioned by Eugene · AI-assisted

    Critical research report ("Knots, Vasocomputation, and the Biology of Stored Tension") added to the project library: an AI deep-research audit of the essay with a graded evidence matrix. Key findings imported: the two linchpin propositions (objective seconds-scale release on exhalation; vascular smooth muscle as the releasing element) have no located direct evidence; the trigger-point construct dispute extends to the observation base itself; the Midjourney scanner claim needs engineering caveats.

    Why: Symmetric treatment: the featured essay needed a serious adversarial audit before the case could present both sides fairly.

  55. Eugene · AI-assisted

    "Knots of Existence and Vasocomputation" published on the case author's Substack: the featured-hypothesis essay, synthesizing trigger-point electrophysiology, latch-bridge physiology, the hemo-neural hypothesis, Johnson's vasocomputation framework, and contemplative anatomy, with a tiered research program. The essay discloses that its text was generated by AI models (Kimi and Fable) at the author's direction.

    Why: Publish the synthesis and research program that this case examines.