Stones, place names and claims of a sacred centre are different kinds of evidence.
2 selected records · 1 intake lead. Membership records a resemblance; it does not establish common origin.
Compare the recorded features
Each row describes one object, surface or textual scope. A dash means “not recorded”, not “absent”. Features across different rows do not establish co-occurrence.
Association follows the comparison’s source dossier; object date and the age of the name are separate.
Episode, sources & image
Observation scope: object and reported association
Date unresolved · unresolved The photographed museum object needs an exact accession record and date; a tradition’s age is not the age of this example.
Bjørn Christian Tørrissen CC BY-SA 3.0 Image record Existing source image; displayed uncropped. No generated reconstruction.
The identification queue
Leads worth following.
Preserved claims and images, awaiting the checks needed for object records.
Identification open · claim
Cusco, Jerusalem and the name Göbekli Tepe
The supplied planning note also mentions these centre/navel associations. No specific dated witness was supplied; the modern place name is not a Neolithic inscription.
Images, source check & next step
Next: Trace each naming tradition to dated sources before adding cultural attestations.
