Head shapes, feathers and body curves: keep the specific feature in view.
2 selected records · 5 intake leads. Membership records a resemblance; it does not establish common origin.
Compare the recorded features
Each row describes one object, surface or textual scope. A dash means “not recorded”, not “absent”. Features across different rows do not establish co-occurrence.
Individual photographers unresolved Rights unresolved; supplied claim image Image record Existing supplied montage; its parts have unequal source resolution.
The identification queue
Leads worth following.
Preserved claims and images, awaiting the checks needed for object records.
Correction recorded · claim
Egypt, Mexico and a Māori-labelled drawing
The two Mexican panels show the same Olmec monument, La Venta 19. “South America” and “Aztecs, Toltecs” mislabel it. The Egyptian “Hapi” and Māori attributions remain untraced. “Quetzalcoatl” is not a verified identification of the seated figure.
Images, source check & next step
Four-panel serpent comparison. Two panels repeat La Venta Monument 19 under inconsistent labels. Supplied reference; original photographer or compiler uncredited unless stated in the audit. Rights unresolved; retained for source criticism. Not covered by the code licence.
Next: Find the Egyptian object and original Māori illustration; retain the two Mexican views under one physical identity.
The screenshots extend the single Jiroft record with several designs. Their caption’s “3000 BC” is not an independently checked date; exact provenance and authenticity remain open.
Images, source check & next step
Handled stone object attributed in the post to Jiroft; individual provenance unresolved. Supplied reference; original photographer or compiler uncredited unless stated in the audit. Rights unresolved; retained for source criticism. Not covered by the code licence.Handled stone object attributed in the post to Jiroft; individual provenance unresolved. Supplied reference; original photographer or compiler uncredited unless stated in the audit. Rights unresolved; retained for source criticism. Not covered by the code licence.Handled stone object attributed in the post to Jiroft; individual provenance unresolved. Supplied reference; original photographer or compiler uncredited unless stated in the audit. Rights unresolved; retained for source criticism. Not covered by the code licence.Handled stone object attributed in the post to Jiroft; individual provenance unresolved. Supplied reference; original photographer or compiler uncredited unless stated in the audit. Rights unresolved; retained for source criticism. Not covered by the code licence.
Next: Match each design to an inventory and find context; establish whether any image repeats the existing record.
The archive identifies the Injalak Hill painting and reports scholarship placing it among recent, post-contact paintings. It cannot be assigned the pillar’s Neolithic age.
Images, source check & next step
Yingarna painting at Injalak Hill; bags and creation narrative are part of the comparison. Supplied archive; see original image register. Underlying rights unresolved; reproduced for commentary.
Next: Follow the local interpretation and earliest documentation; separate the painting’s age from the age of the tradition.
One of four carvings is recognisable on Pillar 43; the other identities are unresolved. The yam-leaf analogy and shared-meaning proposal need separate tests.
Images, source check & next step
Four broad-headed serpent carvings; three object identities remain untraced. Supplied archive; see original image register. Underlying rights unresolved; reproduced for commentary.Fenton’s comparison of squatting figures and a Rainbow Serpent painting. Supplied archive; see original image register. Underlying rights unresolved; reproduced for commentary.
Next: Identify the carvings, then compare literal head outlines against local snake and plant imagery.
The thread compares a landscape monument with several creature images. The montage’s stone head and paintings remain unidentified; it is not a set of dated equivalent objects.
Images, source check & next step
The supplied comparison montage of serpent forms Individual photographers unresolved Rights unresolved; supplied claim image
Next: Separate the mound, sculpture and paintings; obtain excavation and image sources for each.
