Deep Memory/ Clues to a deeper past
← Cluster index
Cluster · 2 lines of comparison · 2 without an established route · 2 motif families · 8 registered objects

Rapanui traditions

Tiwanaku

2 separate lines of comparison join these two traditions in this collection. 2 of them have no established route.

Motif families: Hands across the torso · Birds & human forms

Cultural context

Rapanui traditions

Different media and episodes in Rapa Nui’s history. Statue construction, later carving, texts and modern records remain separate.

Registered dated episodes: 1,000 CE to 1,875 CE.

  • Hoa Hakananai’a · frontc. 1000–1200 CE · museum estimate · disputed catalogue estimate
  • Hoa Hakananai’a · backDate unresolved · unresolved
  • Orongo birdman boulderc. 1750–1875 CE · catalogue estimate
  • Mata Ngarau birdmenDate unresolved · unresolved
  • Orongo painted slabDate unresolved · unresolved
Cultural context

Tiwanaku

A selected monumental figure; wider Andean traditions are not collapsed into this cluster.

No numerical episode date is yet registered here.

  • Ponce monolithDate unresolved · unresolved
  • Gate of the Sun · friezeCarving date unresolved here · unresolved
Line 01 · Sources partly checked

Hands drawn toward the body

Anatolian, Pacific and Andean figures invite a comparison of gesture.

A basalt moai photographed frontally in a museum: heavy brow, long nose, and slender arms whose hands meet low on the torso
Hoa Hakananai’a · frontOrongo · Rapa Nui
Ponce monolith at Tiwanaku
Ponce monolithTiwanaku
What appears to correspond
  • Arms descend beside a frontal body; the hands converge or act near the torso.
What differs or remains uncertain
  • The Ponce figure holds objects; the other poses need separate descriptions.
  • The hands are not necessarily directed at the same anatomical point.
  • Similar human bodies constrain the number of comfortable or legible sculptural poses.
Transmission check

No route established in this review

No transmission sequence for this specific comparison has been established in the sources reviewed. That is not proof that contact was impossible.

This comparison also reaches Neolithic Anatolia.

Open the full dossier: groups, dates and sources →

Line 02 · Sources partly checked

Bird-headed attendants across traditions

The Gate of the Sun joins the wider birdman question.

Birdman carvings on the back of Hoa Hakananai’a
Hoa Hakananai’a · backOrongo · Rapa Nui
Carved andesite lintel: a central frontal figure with a rayed head holds a staff in each hand, flanked by rows of smaller winged attendants
Gate of the Sun · friezeTiwanaku
What appears to correspond
  • Bird-headed figures occur in all three selected groups.
What differs or remains uncertain
  • Staff-bearing attendants, protective figures and Rapanui birdmen occupy different scenes and contexts.
  • “Viracocha” is a traditional identification of the central figure, not an inscription.
Transmission check

Transmission not yet assessed

This input-led extension has not established or excluded a transmission route.

This comparison also reaches Assyrian imagery.

Open the full dossier: groups, dates and sources →

Keep in the frame

What would move this cluster forward?

Collected comparisons accumulate; they do not compound into proof. Each line still needs its own dated sequence.

  • Trace object dates and acquisition identities.
  • Code exact hand positions, held objects and local sculptural predecessors.
  • Trace the Tiwanaku carving’s chronology and iconographic scholarship.
  • Compare the literal pose and held attributes before comparing divine names.
Follow the evidence

Sources & scope

Provisional editorial records with no independent specialist sign-off. Review stages describe how far sources were checked, not the probability of a historical connection.

  1. claim · Hugh Newman; hosted by Graham Hancock

    Megalithic origins: Göbekli Tepe and Peru

    Guest article, 29 March 2014. Specific comparisons include hands toward the abdomen, sacred centres and distant statuary.

  2. museum · British Museum

    Hoa Hakananai’a: collection record

    Identifies the statue and back carvings; construction and later carving episodes must be separated.

  3. project · Deep Memory

    The project’s illustrated comparison archive

    Records comparisons assembled from this repository and supplied material. An external first proposer has not been traced for every pair.

  4. supplied material · Supplied project archive

    Input coverage and identification audit

    Every supplied file is accounted for. Coverage is separate from verification; unresolved montages remain leads.

  5. project · Deep Memory

    Supplied-image identity register

    Preserves captions, uncertainties and supplied images. A social caption is not an independent archaeological identification.

  6. museum · The Metropolitan Museum of Art

    Eagle-headed relief · 32.143.7

    Exact object pictured here: Nimrud, reign of Ashurnasirpal II, ca. 883–859 BCE. Bucket and cone in a protective ritual context.