Deep Memory/ Clues to a deeper past
← All comparisons
Sources partly checked · Bodies & gestures

Hands drawn toward the body

Anatolian, Pacific and Andean figures invite a comparison of gesture.

3 groups · 3 registered records · reviewed 2026-09-19

Motif families: Hands across the torso

Neolithic Anatolia

Anatolian torso gestures

The Balıklıgöl statue in the hand-position comparison.

Why these examples belong together

One example so far. Its exact posture must be checked before expanding the group.

The Balıklıgöl statue, commonly called Urfa Man
object · Şanlıurfa

Urfa Man

The actual meeting place of the hands needs to be described from full views rather than assumed from a “navel” caption.

Dates, sources & image record
  • Date unresolvedunresolved · Early Neolithic attribution is retained as context, but an object-level dating source has not yet been checked for this entry.

photograph · Dosseman. CC BY-SA 4.0. Image record
Existing source image; displayed uncropped. No generated reconstruction.

Megalithic origins: Göbekli Tepe and Peru · The project’s illustrated comparison archive

Rapanui traditions

Rapanui torso gestures

The frontal surface of Hoa Hakananai’a.

Why these examples belong together

A different surface of the statue already included in the birdman group; not a second independent statue.

A basalt moai photographed frontally in a museum: heavy brow, long nose, and slender arms whose hands meet low on the torso
surface · Orongo · Rapa Nui

Hoa Hakananai’a · front

Same physical statue as the back-surface entry. Separate records describe different surfaces and carving episodes, not independent statues.

Dates, sources & image record
  • c. 1000–1200 CE · museum estimatedisputed catalogue estimate · Museum’s traditional statue date; recent settlement research gives a later island chronology. This range is disputed context, not a direct measurement. Date source

photograph · Andreas Praefcke. Public domain. Image record
Wikimedia Commons server-rendered JPEG at 1280 px wide; not cropped.

Hoa Hakananai’a: collection record · Moai: objects, histories and Rapanui perspectives · Ancient Rapanui genomes and contact with the Americas · Hoa Hakananai'a, front view (British Museum Oc1869,1005.1)

Another view of this example
Front and side of Hoa Hakananai’a
Front and side of Hoa Hakananai’a
James Miles · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Image record
Existing source image; displayed uncropped. No generated reconstruction.
Tiwanaku

Andean torso gestures

The Ponce monolith at Tiwanaku.

Why these examples belong together

Included as a proposed analogue; the held objects are a difference requiring explicit coding.

Ponce monolith at Tiwanaku
object · Tiwanaku

Ponce monolith

The hands hold objects. That relationship differs from hands lying empty across a torso.

Dates, sources & image record
  • Date unresolvedunresolved · An individual monument chronology has not been source-checked in this edition.

photograph · P. Hughes. CC BY 4.0. Image record
Existing source image; displayed uncropped. No generated reconstruction.

The project’s illustrated comparison archive

The proposed connection

What makes it a question?

A similar resting arrangement is proposed as a persistent convention across disconnected sculptural traditions.

Newman explicitly compares Urfa Man with distant torso gestures including moai. The Ponce example is the project’s additional proposed comparison, not a claim that Newman identified this exact statue.
Megalithic origins: Göbekli Tepe and Peru

Look closely

What appears to correspond

  • Arms descend beside a frontal body; the hands converge or act near the torso.
Keep in the frame

What differs or remains uncertain

  • The Ponce figure holds objects; the other poses need separate descriptions.
  • The hands are not necessarily directed at the same anatomical point.
  • Similar human bodies constrain the number of comfortable or legible sculptural poses.
Transmission check

No route established in this review

No transmission sequence for this specific comparison has been established in the sources reviewed. That is not proof that contact was impossible.

What would move this forward

  • Trace object dates and acquisition identities.
  • Code exact hand positions, held objects and local sculptural predecessors.
Follow the evidence

Sources & scope

Provisional editorial record; no independent specialist sign-off. Status describes review depth, not the probability of a historical connection.

  1. claim · Hugh Newman; hosted by Graham Hancock

    Megalithic origins: Göbekli Tepe and Peru

    Guest article, 29 March 2014. Specific comparisons include hands toward the abdomen, sacred centres and distant statuary.

  2. museum · British Museum

    Hoa Hakananai’a: collection record

    Identifies the statue and back carvings; construction and later carving episodes must be separated.

  3. project · Deep Memory

    The project’s illustrated comparison archive

    Records comparisons assembled from this repository and supplied material. An external first proposer has not been traced for every pair.

  4. museum · British Museum

    Moai: objects, histories and Rapanui perspectives

    Museum account gives an early traditional statue date and a later birdman tradition. Its settlement chronology differs from recent research.

  5. research · Moreno-Mayar et al., 2024

    Ancient Rapanui genomes and contact with the Americas

    Ancient-genome evidence supports pre-European admixture dated about 1250–1430 CE. It does not establish a route for a particular motif.

  6. photograph · Andreas Praefcke

    Hoa Hakananai'a, front view (British Museum Oc1869,1005.1)

    A public-domain frontal photograph showing the arms and hands against the torso more clearly than the previous view.